| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
07-14-2017, 12:47 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
|
Managing fisheries
Well this really could set an unwanted precedent.
|
DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"
Bi + Ne = SB 2
If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
|
|
|
|
07-14-2017, 01:24 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: marshfield
Posts: 3,620
|
yeah we need to lay off fluke for a bit. some years are pretty good but lately the inshore spots just don't have many bigger fish
|
my 1st wife didn't like me fishing so much
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2017, 04:55 AM
|
#3
|
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Has anything GOOD ever come out of New Jersey?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2017, 05:06 AM
|
#4
|
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 5,515
|
Certainly not Jersey barriers , the only state you have to drive through to turn around
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-16-2017, 11:03 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
great- now Wilbur Ross knows more about fisheries management than the Commission that is charged with the job.......
you know- since he's such a big fisherman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-16-2017, 02:41 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,374
|
it all in the de regulation agenda of the new administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2017, 10:12 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
The decision was made on the advice of NMFS. Ross just rubber stamped it. So now we will have NMFS second guessing the MAFMC/ASMFC fishery plans even after they approve them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2017, 05:32 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
if that's the case, it may not be a bad thing.... ASMFC is accountable to no one, even their own technical committee advice. NMFS has more legal constraints that compels them to act when fishery numbers go down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 08:30 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobber
if that's the case, it may not be a bad thing.... ASMFC is accountable to no one, even their own technical committee advice. NMFS has more legal constraints that compels them to act when fishery numbers go down
|
Its a very bad thing. Summer flounder, scup and sea bass are jointly managed by the ASMFC and MAFMC, so anything that's approved already has to meet federal requirements. This is just precedent for the NMFS second guessing the ASMFC as to what actions constitute "conservational equivalency." |
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:44 AM
|
#10
|
|
surfwalker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
Has anything GOOD ever come out of New Jersey?
|
ANSWER: YES GEORGE: ME!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-22-2017, 12:10 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
Its a very bad thing. Summer flounder, scup and sea bass are jointly managed by the ASMFC and MAFMC, so anything that's approved already has to meet federal requirements. This is just precedent for the NMFS second guessing the ASMFC as to what actions constitute "conservational equivalency."
|
more regulations/bureaucracy is never a good thing, but ASMFC has proven time after time that they are not good at managing species proactively- they sit on their hands and cater to the commercial interests/states until things require drastic changes to avoid catastrophe.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.
|
| |
