The Russians are coming, say the democrats!!!

[Jim in CT]

Everything is Russia's fault. TX would be a blue state if not for Russia.

[wdmso]

Nothing like downplaying the info from our intelligence community

[Jim in CT]

there are things trump does that i don’t like. i’m poking fun at the nonsensical idea that russia is the reason why he won, and that russia will
tilt the 2020 election. not buying it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

there are things trump does that i don’t like. i’m poking fun at the nonsensical idea that russia is the reason why he won, and that russia will
tilt the 2020 election. not buying it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No one here has ever suggested if it wasn't for russia he would have lost..

The issue is Trump and his supporters appreciate the interference. And Trump himself invites it..

Then joke about it

But say socialism and the fear mongers come out in force ...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Go to 26 minute part of video.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Go to 26 minute part of video.

De bunked and surprising no info to support then claim

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

De bunked and surprising no info to support then claim

[Pete F.]

The only question for Trump on Russian interference should be:
What have you done so far and what will you do to prevent Russia from interfering again in 2020?

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

De bunked and surprising no info to support then claim

CNN backtracked on its report that intel found that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election in in order to re-elect Trump:

The US intelligence community has assessed that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election and has separately assessed that Russia views Trump as a leader they can work with. But the US does not have evidence that Russia's interference this cycle is aimed at reelecting Trump, the officials said.
'The intelligence doesn't say that," one senior national security official told CNN. "A more reasonable interpretation of the intelligence is not that they have a preference, it's a step short of that. It's more that they understand the President is someone they can work with, he's a dealmaker."

Dan Bongino, whom you tried to belittle as an uninformed partisan hack, had said in one of the videos of him that I posted, exactly what CNN had to finally admit. Bongino did that a few days before CNN finally got it right. Bongino is no hack. He has good sources. He got it right about the Russian "collusion" nonsense that CNN and the rest of fake news were pushing, as well as being right about the obstruction nonsense and the unsupportable impeachment charges--all the while when MSM was trying to convince us that Trump was finished, that he would be convicted of one thing after another.

You might want to consider that your views are being molded by massive misinformation.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

CNN backtracked on its report that intel found that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election in in order to re-elect Trump:

The US intelligence community has assessed that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election and has separately assessed that Russia views Trump as a leader they can work with. But the US does not have evidence that Russia's interference this cycle is aimed at reelecting Trump, the officials said.
'The intelligence doesn't say that," one senior national security official told CNN. "A more reasonable interpretation of the intelligence is not that they have a preference, it's a step short of that. It's more that they understand the President is someone they can work with, he's a dealmaker."

Dan Bongino, whom you tried to belittle as an uninformed partisan hack, had said in one of the videos of him that I posted, exactly what CNN had to finally admit. Bongino did that a few days before CNN finally got it right. Bongino is no hack. He has good sources. He got it right about the Russian "collusion" nonsense that CNN and the rest of fake news were pushing, as well as being right about the obstruction nonsense and the unsupportable impeachment charges--all the while when MSM was trying to convince us that Trump was finished, that he would be convicted of one thing after another.

You might want to consider that your views are being molded by massive misinformation.

so now you and bigo believe the intelligence people classic funny anything against Trump is a Hoax and everything against those against Trump is a conspiracy theory...

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

so now you and bigo believe the intelligence people classic funny anything against Trump is a Hoax and everything against those against Trump is a conspiracy theory...

No. Never said anything like that. Do you believe they are always right when they "funny anything against Trump"? Do you always believe everything CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, N.Y. Times, say about Trump, or what they say that the intelligence people say about Trump?

I just pointed out that Bongino was right in spite of your insinuation that he lacks credibility and that there was "no info to support" his claim. And that the sources that you seemed to get your info from were wrong.

[spence]

CNN didn’t backtrack it’s reportng, the US Govt sent people out to say the briefer went too far in their characterization. Sounds like an effort to muddy the issue more to correct the record.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

the leftists here sound nuttier than the loons in the dem debates....