|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
|
09-27-2013, 01:43 PM
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
striped bass were the one big success story in fisheries management history... and now its gone down the toilet. they have gone from abundance to scarcity it 10 years. it'll take another10 years at least to get back to anything even close to what it was in 2001 (insert yer favorite season......)
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 01:53 PM
|
#32
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,125
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
Duh.
As long as the fishery is manipulated for maximum yield....as it will be when commercial interests are involved....the quality of fishing will suffer.
Obviously if recreational fishermen kill equivalent numbers of fish there is no difference. But that is not what happens. Once a fishery loses economic value it is managed for recreational quality rather than maximum yield and the pressure to kill and keep fish diminishes as does the pressure on the fishery scientists to keep justifying such kill for the economic well being of a small subset of resource users.
|
Numbskull is right , but the ones in charge don't want to hear that.
Striped bass are in trouble, no question about it
keep whackin and stackin and there will continue to be few fish around to have any chance at catching a decent bass
|
The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.
1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!
It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 02:47 PM
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
Duh.
Once a fishery loses economic value it is managed for recreational quality rather than maximum yield and the pressure to kill and keep fish diminishes as does the pressure on the fishery scientists to keep justifying such kill for the economic well being of a small subset of resource users.
|
Once again totally wrong, all fisheries, by law, must be managed for MSY.
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 03:03 PM
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: south shore , ma
Posts: 669
|
I ain't buying there crap 2 poor seasons in a row for me , i'm no sharpie but I put in the time
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 05:00 PM
|
#35
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
Once again totally wrong, all fisheries, by law, must be managed for MSY.
|
You are hiding behind the ASMFC mandate.
You are hiding behind a commercial concept of maximum "yield" which implies dead fish.
What is the maximum sustainable yield that ensures a quality fishery?
Why are we not fishing to that number?
That number exists just as certainly as the one that is used for a fishery managed for maximum sustainable kill. The numbers are not the same. Someone makes a decision which number to use. That someone is heavily influenced by commercial pressure.
To fix it all we need is an amendment making striped bass a gamefish and stipulating they be fished to a maximum yield that sustains a quality fishery rather than a bare minimum surviving population as we do now.
It is not rocket science, you know it as well as I, which is exactly why you keep obfuscating the issue.
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 05:08 PM
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
You are hiding behind the ASMFC mandate.
You are hiding behind a commercial concept of maximum "yield" which implies dead fish.
What is the maximum sustainable yield that ensures a quality fishery?
Why are we not fishing to that number?
That number exists just as certainly as the one that is used for a fishery managed for maximum sustainable kill. The numbers are not the same. Someone makes a decision which number to use. That someone is heavily influenced by commercial pressure.
To fix it all we need is an amendment making striped bass a gamefish and stipulating they be fished to a maximum yield that sustains a quality fishery rather than a bare minimum surviving population as we do now.
It is not rocket science, you know it as well as I, which is exactly why you keep obfuscating the issue.
|
I'm not hiding behind anything personally I don't give a crap. But the MSA requires all fisheries be managed for MSY. You otoh seem to misunderstand what the law requires.
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 06:12 PM
|
#37
|
Too old to give a....
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,505
|
Obfuscate , what a cool word , talk about bringing out the hammer !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 07:32 PM
|
#38
|
Land OF Forgotten Toys
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central MA
Posts: 2,309
|
If we can not maintain the SSB target threshold maybe the MSY needs to be altered to reflect maintaining the target.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-27-2013, 10:37 PM
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,939
|
This thread is worst than any of my urban dictionary posts. Delete or move to the political forum. This thread happens every year. It's older than Eve's TIIIT'S.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 12:31 AM
|
#40
|
Land OF Forgotten Toys
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central MA
Posts: 2,309
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WESTPORTMAFIA
This thread is worst than any of my urban dictionary posts. Delete or move to the political forum. This thread happens every year. It's older than Eve's TIIIT'S.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Sad but true. It shouldn't have to be a conversation.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I am the man in the Bassless Chaps
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 02:01 AM
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,939
|
I'll refrain a little as I was only joking. But I think its a dead horse that belongs in the political forum
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 02:06 AM
|
#42
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,824
|
WPM, you're right. It happens every year and we get no where. I am resolved to the fact that I will see the second moratorium of my life time for stripers. It is inevitable with the level of slaughter that is going on. I am not blaming anyone as the recs are as guilty as the comms with over harvesting what should be a game fish. But this IS a dead horse. 
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 06:43 AM
|
#43
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
It's not a dead horse. It's a horse you go out into a field every night and try to beat with a stick, but its never there. There used to be lots of horses in the field though..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 06:58 AM
|
#44
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Warren Vt
Posts: 668
|
and some feilds that never had horses have more horses than ever.if the horses were distributed over all the feilds like years ago i would bet the number of horses has gone down slightly since there all time high some years back.not saying that measures shouldn't be taken to insure that there are horses in the future,but there are quite a few cowboys who speak out both sides of their mouths
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 07:29 AM
|
#45
|
Land OF Forgotten Toys
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central MA
Posts: 2,309
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by l.i.fish.in.vt
and some feilds that never had horses have more horses than ever.if the horses were distributed over all the feilds like years ago i would bet the number of horses has gone down slightly since there all time high some years back.not saying that measures shouldn't be taken to insure that there are horses in the future,but there are quite a few cowboys who speak out both sides of their mouths
|
Most of the time I talk out of my a&$. 😉
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I am the man in the Bassless Chaps
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 11:55 AM
|
#46
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by l.i.fish.in.vt
...............but there are quite a few cowboys who speak out both sides of their mouths
|
And quite a few money loving ranchers with their heads in a hole and pleased with the view.
|
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 12:46 PM
|
#47
|
Annisquam Assassin
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Peabody, MA
Posts: 669
|
in my young and inexperienced opinion, this is EXACTLY the type of thread that belongs here. I thought the main forum was for just these types of conversations. Does it involve politics? Yes, but anything that is organized will always have politics at play. The issue, at least as it seems to me, is that no matter what side you're on, the bass are "property" of people. The fisheries management, the recs, the state, the fed....everyone THINKS they know the best way to manage the stock. If people looked towards the future without regard to their own interest, I have a feeling that there wouldn't need to be these discussions. But, as we're talking about humans, there will always be people who are in it just for themselves. Maybe someday I will win the powerball, then lobby for a senior level fisheries management position so I could change from the inside out!
|
Calling fishing a hobby is like calling brain surgery a job. ~Paul Schullery
There he stands, draped in more equipment than a telephone lineman, trying to outwit an organism with a brain no bigger than a breadcrumb, and getting licked in the process. ~Paul O'Neil, 1965
|
|
|
09-28-2013, 05:35 PM
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Warren Vt
Posts: 668
|
lets not forget the wealthy egotistical ranchers who have their noses so far up in the air they can't see whats in front of them.
|
|
|
|
09-29-2013, 07:26 AM
|
#49
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by l.i.fish.in.vt
lets not forget the wealthy egotistical ranchers who have their noses so far up in the air they can't see whats in front of them.
|
You're wrong there, my smug vituperative friend.
My nose is in the air because I wear bifocals and that is the only way I can see what is left the pathetic striped bass population you are so eager to accept is healthy.
Yes, yes, I understand, there are plenty of striped bass...... it is just that they all live over the horizon now so lets just keep killing all the ones we can still reach and things will be fine. After all, the only good bass is a dead bass.
Alas, although you don't seem to realize it, you are right. There are plenty of striped bass if the 2011 YOY is correct. Soon we will be crawling in 16" fish again. And in 10-15 years they will even be worth catching. So in the meantime any remaining fish are expendable and under the law, as MakoMike so gleefully trumpets, they should be killed.
True, that will leave nothing but small fish to catch, but so what? With the help of fishery managers the commercial size limit can always be adjusted downward to take advantage of the bonanza of small fish and business can go on without any threat to sustainability.
What's not to like? Other than me, of course. 
|
|
|
|
09-29-2013, 08:06 AM
|
#50
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Harmony, Rhode Island
Posts: 311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
You're wrong there, my smug vituperative friend.
My nose is in the air because I wear bifocals and that is the only way I can see what is left the pathetic striped bass population you are so eager to accept is healthy.
Yes, yes, I understand, there are plenty of striped bass...... it is just that they all live over the horizon now so lets just keep killing all the ones we can still reach and things will be fine. After all, the only good bass is a dead bass.
Alas, although you don't seem to realize it, you are right. There are plenty of striped bass if the 2011 YOY is correct. Soon we will be crawling in 16" fish again. And in 10-15 years they will even be worth catching. So in the meantime any remaining fish are expendable and under the law, as MakoMike so gleefully trumpets, they should be killed.
True, that will leave nothing but small fish to catch, but so what? With the help of fishery managers the commercial size limit can always be adjusted downward to take advantage of the bonanza of small fish and business can go on without any threat to sustainability.
What's not to like? Other than me, of course. 
|
Thank you for writing what many are thinking...
|
|
|
|
09-29-2013, 08:12 AM
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
So in the meantime any remaining fish are expendable and under the law, as MakoMike so gleefully trumpets, they should be killed.
|
If you don't like the law work to change it, don't blame me for it. MSA is up for renewal next year, so here is your chance.
|
|
|
|
09-29-2013, 09:57 AM
|
#52
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
If you don't like the law work to change it, don't blame me for it. MSA is up for renewal next year, so here is your chance.
|
I don't blame you for it, Mike. It is just that your posts help highlight the problem, namely using the law as an excuse to continue hammering a fishery that is badly damaged (even if it is still sustainable).
Last edited by numbskull; 09-29-2013 at 10:45 AM..
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 08:11 AM
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
I don't blame you for it, Mike. It is just that your posts help highlight the problem, namely using the law as an excuse to continue hammering a fishery that is badly damaged (even if it is still sustainable).
|
You still don't get it, its not an "excuse" its what the managers are required to do.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 08:30 AM
|
#54
|
Afterhours Custom Plugs
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 8,642
|
Anyone with eyes who has fished the last decade or so knows the truth. We don't need any convoluted BS slingers telling us what's happening here. Take the $ bounty off their heads and get back to 1 @36" and presto change we will once again have a world class fishery.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 10:32 AM
|
#55
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afterhours
Anyone with eyes who has fished the last decade or so knows the truth. We don't need any convoluted BS slingers telling us what's happening here. Take the $ bounty off their heads and get back to 1 @36" and presto change we will once again have a world class fishery.
|
"Convoluted BS slingers"? It would be illegal to do what you are suggesting.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 12:13 PM
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 14000 / 44031.5
Posts: 932
|
MMike- if the next YOY assessment is low, will that trigger the reductions?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 12:33 PM
|
#57
|
Afterhours Custom Plugs
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 8,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
"Convoluted BS slingers"? It would be illegal to do what you are suggesting.
|
what did i suggest that's illegal??????? as far gov't biologists go i've had them tell me to my face that their #'s could be off by as much as 50%. and why do so many long time fishermen see what i see? denial- it ain;t just a river in egypt.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 03:25 PM
|
#58
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,270
|
Tragedy of the commons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
It's not a dead horse. It's a horse you go out into a field every night and try to beat with a stick, but its never there. There used to be lots of horses in the field though..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|

|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 03:25 PM
|
#59
|
D'oh
Join Date: May 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 3,296
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbskull
A healthy fishery is what we want, not a maximally exploited one, even if that exploitation is "sustainable".
|
I think this sums it up best. Unfortunately, Mike is right, the managers' hands are tied due to federal law.
Apparently, according to Mike, MSA is "up"? next year, so I guess now is the chance to make a change.
Changing to gamefish status, or 1@36" are all great mantras for Striped Bass regulation, but striped bass are just a very small piece of a gigantic confusing puzzle which is managed by MSA, and MSA won't allow for anything except taking MSY.
The way we assess & manage fisheries needs to drastically change, and it sounds like the chance to do this is with the re-visiting of the MSA next year.
The first question is, what is the new management scheme that is better than what they do now?
|
i bent my wookie
|
|
|
09-30-2013, 03:27 PM
|
#60
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Once I heard that the lobsterman of southern New England and Long Island sound were blaming the lobster crash on striped bass I knew bass would never be fully protected. Bass are like zack said.. A single piece in the puzzle.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM.
|
| |