|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
|
12-05-2005, 10:58 AM
|
#1
|
M.S.B.A.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
|
Time to fight for Eels
MarineFisheries Advisory
December 1, 2005
REMINDER OF ASMFC HEARING ON DRAFT ADDDENDUM 1 TO AMERICAN EEL INTERSTATE FISHERY MANGAEMENT PLAN
Hearing in Massachusetts on January 5th
The Commonwealth will host an ASMFC hearing on January 5th to gather comments on Draft Addendum I to the American Eel Plan. Addendum I outlines a proposal to establish a mandatory catch and effort monitoring program for American eel.A hearing will be held on Thursday, January 5th beginning at 6:00 PM at the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Avenue, Gloucester, Massachusetts. For more information on Addendum I please visit www.asmfc.org.
The public is encouraged to submit comments regarding this document at any time during the addendum process. The final time and date that comments will be accepted is 5:00 PM on February 7, 2005. Comments may be submitted by mail, email, or fax. If you would like to submit comment in writing, please use the contact information below:
Mail: Lydia Munger Email: comments@asmfc.org (Subject line: American eel)
ASMFC Fax: (202) 289-6051
1444 ‘Eye’ St., NW
Washington, D.C. 20005
If you have any questions, please call Lydia Munger at (202) 289-6400
|
"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 11:15 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
IMHO, this whole addendum 1 thing is a flawed exercise, and I intend to make my views known to the ASMFC. The peer revies of the dismal stock assessment is due to take place in a couple of weeks, and if the peer panel supports the technicall committee, this addendum is like putting a band aid on a s#^^^^^&g chest wound. If any of you get Nor'east Saltwater magazine or On the Water Magazine you'll shorty be seeing my article on the plight of the American Eel. The eel is in trouble and putting out an addendum at this point that 1)does nothing about it and 2) raises expectations that the fishery will continue as it has in the past, is not something the ASMFC should be doing at this point in time.
BTW- The RI Hearing is scheduled for Jan 18th at the URI bay campus' Corless Auditorium.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#3
|
Bay & Beach Inspector
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mid-Cape
Posts: 155
|
The ASMFC action may be irrelevent anyway. The US Fish & Wildlife Service is considering a petition to "list" the American. If they do so, it will be declared either an "endangered" or a "threatened species".
If that occurs, it will be illegal to catch, transport, import or posess the eels anyplace in the US.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:08 PM
|
#4
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
|
Does that mean there will be a "Sluggo" shortage next year?
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:23 PM
|
#5
|
Retired Surfer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
|
Eels
Eels grow in fresh water after spawning in salt water, catadromus fish, right. They're not enough people to watch everything else that is wrong with the fisheries (poachers) how is anyone going to police eel users. The bycatch problem in Robbins Pond in East Bridgewater is enormous I know but to this magnitude I'm not so sure.
My point is how would anyone possibly regulate this particular fishery? 
|
Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#6
|
Retired Surfer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
|
Regulation
What offshore posted would be the only answer to any overfishing problem. That would bite!
|
Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
please comment
as I said in an other post, my former advisor who is scienc edirector at asmfc tells me that public comment is statistically evaluated and seriously considered. The more input they get from us, the more it is considered. I am sending my letter this evening. I don't think its even a band-aid. Its more like taking the temperature of a person in cardiac arrest. 
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:50 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore
The ASMFC action may be irrelevent anyway. The US Fish & Wildlife Service is considering a petition to "list" the American. If they do so, it will be declared either an "endangered" or a "threatened species".
If that occurs, it will be illegal to catch, transport, import or posess the eels anyplace in the US.
|
The USF&WS and NOAA fisheries process is IMHO unlikely to list the eel as either endangered or threatened, if at all until about this time next year. They have unti the end of next July to make their preliminary decision, and if they think a listing is warranted there will be a peer review of the sceintific findings followed by a 90 Day public comment period followed by a thorty day waiting period. So any action likely won't happen until at least next Nov.
Furthermore, even if they do list the eel as threatened, there is no guarantee that all fishing for them will be stopped. Though IMHO it should be. Again IMHO, the eel will not be listed and the other regional fishery management groups (gulf coast and great lakes) will go along with whatever the ASMFC decides, which is why I consider their decision so important.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 12:50 PM
|
#9
|
Gone Dark
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Buzzards Bay
Posts: 512
|
I read the ASMFC addendum 1. someone pleased explain to me where the actual facts are that the eel is in danger. the amendment clearly says most states have no idea what the population is good or bad. It looks like Massachusetts wants to monitor the harvesting of eels to keep track of it.ok but option 2 refers to keeping track of unreported cash sales of tackle shops?? years ago I heard of poachers from maine getting caught illegally harvestings elvers. how many saltwater rec.fisherman do you know that would trap and keep a tiny eel. when they pass this management plan what will be the net result? you can buy eels but moving forward the state will be able to manage the situation more closely? or no eels period? or the pass the plan then the year after they use the info we supply to shut down the fishery?
|
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 06:35 PM
|
#10
|
Ruled only by the tide
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truro
Posts: 801
|
eels
If the american eel is in trouble, it would do us all well to participate in conservation. Similarly for river herring. While fisherman use a rather low percentage of eels (compared to eels used for food consumption in Europe and Asia), if we think about the future, our children, and grandchildren; we shouldn't be short-sighted here.
It would be nice to set a "quota" rather than a "ban" and maybe a "set-aside" for use by domestic (US/Canada) fishermen, but we live in a world where humans have a dramatic impact on the environment. Think this through before you take a stand one way or the other.
|
Three-fourths of the Earth's surface is water, and one-fourth is land. It is quite clear that the good Lord intended us to spend triple the amount of time fishing as taking care of the lawn.
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 07:54 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetwater
If the american eel is in trouble, it would do us all well to participate in conservation. Similarly for river herring. While fisherman use a rather low percentage of eels (compared to eels used for food consumption in Europe and Asia), if we think about the future, our children, and grandchildren; we shouldn't be short-sighted here.
|
Most of the eels used for food in Europe and Asia are different eels than the American Eel that we are talking about here. I forget the exact percentage, but the amount of eels used by fishermen for bait is not a small percentage of the total catch.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 08:19 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mass.
Posts: 82
|
MakoMike- From reading the postings I think most respondents believe that the American eel is being overfished when the main problem is the adults being killed by the power plant turbines while they migrate back to the sea. Add to this the dams which are keeping the young from reaching the freshwater growing grounds and it doesn't take much to completely deplete the species. If the root cause of the problem isn't addressed then the powers that be can ban fishing for them, etc. but the eel will become extinct. I know many of the areas where 30-40 yrs. ago you could fill a boat with eels now you see none, and alot of it has to do with coastal development and a power plant.
Banning using eels without rectifying the main problem isn't going to increase the population. To me the wrong agency is looking inot the problem. Just my $.02. Ron
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 08:23 AM
|
#13
|
googan
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Googanville
Posts: 354
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chief10
...but option 2 refers to keeping track of unreported cash sales of tackle shops??
|
Ummm.... if these sales are unreported, then by their very nature...... uhhh... nevermind.
Is that language actually In the addendum?
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 08:28 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 3,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
Most of the eels used for food in Europe and Asia are different eels than the American Eel that we are talking about here.
|
What kind of eels do they use? I thought the asians imported a lot of american and european eel elvers and then grew them to market size? Also thought that euopean eels and american eels are the same species.
Last edited by cheferson; 01-04-2008 at 06:03 PM..
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 09:09 AM
|
#15
|
Bay & Beach Inspector
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mid-Cape
Posts: 155
|
For years there has been an two eel fisheries in Maine. In the Spring, the elvers were netted and shopped to the orient. That practice has beeen curtailed, if not stopped.
During the season, adult eels are netted and shipped to Europe. That was the case a few years back and I assume it still is.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 09:32 AM
|
#16
|
Boston Anglah
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sitting on top of the world with my legs hangin free
Posts: 3,322
|
Wednesday, January 25 at the MSBA monthly meeting
Rigging and fishing Sluggo's, Steve McKenna
Steve McKenna of On The Water magazine will be giving a presentation on rigging sluggo's as well as effective methods of fishing them from shore. Steve also may mention a few sweet spots to fish sluggo's, so bring your map book... 
|
Used hard and put away dirty....
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
|
Maine still has a spring elver season, mostly done with fyke nets. A few years back it was tightened up a bit and some permit restrictions were put in place. CCA Maine did a good job of making that happen.
Prices for elvers have also been down for several years, which has helped. Spring 05 the prices started rising again to over one hundred dollars a pound and fishing pressure increased along with poaching. I believe the only other states which have an elver season is Florida and South Carolina.
Eels have the most liberal regs of almost any coastal species. I have yet to find any science which justifies the lack of limits on these fish. It's just the way we have always done it so why change it. At least with other species they have some science, whether right or wrong, to back up the regs.
The ASMFC lack of action indicates that they are going to duck behind the Feds, and let them be the bad guys through the listing procces.
The following are quotes from the American Eel Fishery Management Plan Cooridinator regarding the state of eel stocks.
"You know, I think it's just coming to light now that this population is really in trouble and that there are things we should be doing about it," she says.
"My sense is that it's massive declines,"
When faced with massive declines doing nothing is a pretty lousy option.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 02:29 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronfish
MakoMike- From reading the postings I think most respondents believe that the American eel is being overfished when the main problem is the adults being killed by the power plant turbines while they migrate back to the sea. Add to this the dams which are keeping the young from reaching the freshwater growing grounds and it doesn't take much to completely deplete the species. If the root cause of the problem isn't addressed then the powers that be can ban fishing for them, etc. but the eel will become extinct. I know many of the areas where 30-40 yrs. ago you could fill a boat with eels now you see none, and alot of it has to do with coastal development and a power plant.
Banning using eels without rectifying the main problem isn't going to increase the population. To me the wrong agency is looking inot the problem. Just my $.02. Ron
|
You are absolutely right if what you are saying is that fishing for eels is only part of the problem. But that is the only aspect that the ASMFC can control. IMHO eel fishing has got be addressed, preferably in conjunction with other restrictions on dams, but we have to dramatically decrease all eel mortality, no matter what the cause.
Chef,
The asians mostly use native eels as well as some farm rasied American eels, the Europeans also import some American eels but mostly use european eels, which are a different species than the American eel.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 08:38 AM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mass.
Posts: 82
|
MakoMike- Last year about this time I remember reading quite a bit about a couple of brothers trying to get the American eel placeed on the endangered species list because of the affect the hydroelectric dams (in Maine I think) were having on the population. The dams were stopping the elvers from ascending the rivers to get to fresh water to grow and the dams were killing the adults which were trying to get back out to sea because of the turbines. You might try a Goggle search and find out some more on the topic.
I agree that the AFSME is the one agency looking at the fishing aspect of the eel but the Feds are also loking at it from a different perspective(endangered species). I hope the eels are declared endangered because that will cause the power companies to make the changes needed in their operation to protect the eels, and many other species which ustilize the salt/fresh water interface for breeding and growth. Ron
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 09:31 AM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Ron,
I am aware of the ESA petition and I have in fact talked to Tim Watts who is one of the brothers. In fact the USF&WS and NOAA fisheries process is not going to be a lot different than the ASMFC process. The feds are going to do their own stock assessment based on the ASMFC stock assessment and simply adding to the ASMFC data by holding regional workshops for fishery managers from the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission and the Great Lakes Marine Fisheries Commission. You can find an outline of the Federal process in the minutes of the American eel management board of the AMFC, where thry outlines their plans to the board.
Frankly I am not optomistic that the feds will list the eel as endangered. I think it will be be a stretch for them to list the eel as threatened. But if they do either then FERC would have to take action to reduce eel mortality through the dams.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 10:14 AM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 10:29 AM
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
|
An important aspect of the current listing process is assessing threats to the species, and determining wether or not these threat issues are being addressed. The major threats appear to be habitat loss due to dams, hydro mortality, fishing pressure and an introduced swim bladder nematode. Currently nothing of significance is being done to address these threats. ASMFC has an opportunity to address the only threat which can be easily addressed, fishing mortality, they have apparently chose to duck and hide instead.
Not only is ASMFC hiding behind the listing process, they are hiding behind their own failure to gather species information since the Eel Management Board was established in 2000. Addendum 1 essentially says we haven’t done much of anything since 2000 so we can’t take any real action, but we are going to get serious about gathering data in the future. In the mean time the eel populations dwindle. The whole thing is reminiscent of a Monty Python Flying Circus skit.
This puts the Feds in a difficult position. If they determine the stocks are declining as much as they appear to be, and if none of the threats are being addressed as of next year at about this time, they will have to list them.
Another important aspect of this whole affair is that eels are completely different than any other managed species. There is only one spawning stock of American eel and they can’t be reproduced in captivity. If the populations drop to low there is no place to get more American eels, we may lose them.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 11:26 AM
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 372
|
I think if they kept the "American" eel in America and stopped exporting it to Europe and Asia, the problem would quickly go away.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:44 PM
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timw
An important aspect of the current listing process is assessing threats to the species, and determining wether or not these threat issues are being addressed. The major threats appear to be habitat loss due to dams, hydro mortality, fishing pressure and an introduced swim bladder nematode. Currently nothing of significance is being done to address these threats. ASMFC has an opportunity to address the only threat which can be easily addressed, fishing mortality, they have apparently chose to duck and hide instead.
Not only is ASMFC hiding behind the listing process, they are hiding behind their own failure to gather species information since the Eel Management Board was established in 2000. Addendum 1 essentially says we haven’t done much of anything since 2000 so we can’t take any real action, but we are going to get serious about gathering data in the future. In the mean time the eel populations dwindle. The whole thing is reminiscent of a Monty Python Flying Circus skit.
This puts the Feds in a difficult position. If they determine the stocks are declining as much as they appear to be, and if none of the threats are being addressed as of next year at about this time, they will have to list them.
Another important aspect of this whole affair is that eels are completely different than any other managed species. There is only one spawning stock of American eel and they can’t be reproduced in captivity. If the populations drop to low there is no place to get more American eels, we may lose them.
|
You and Drugless are heathen eel lovin' sumanabitches!!! 
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 01:23 PM
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
|
Amen, brother
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 01:36 PM
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
TimW,
Is that you Tim Watts? Anyway, I don't think the ASMFC is d#^^^^^&g the eel issue, yet. The current addendum was in the works long before the stock assessment came in. The stock assessment basically says that the eel is in deep trouble. The assessment is scheduled to go through the peer review process next week. Once that is done they may release the stock assessment to the public (I have an inside source on the technical committee). My problem with the current proposal is that it sets an expectation level that things will pretty much continue as before, and given the stock assesment that clear should not and will not be the case. Once teh stock assessment is peer reviewd and presented the managment board they, IMHO will have no choice but to move to an amendment to the FMP. I have spoken to several memebers of the management board who agree with that statement. But getting an amendment that will seriously restrict eel fishing is not going to be a speedy process. The best we can hope for is, IMHO something to take effect late next summer or fall. And the the entire ASMFC as well as the eel management board needs to feel the pressure from the public. They are already feeling the pressure form the commercial eels fishermen, reporesented by the Deleware valley fish company, that have been present at every technical committee and managment board meeting.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 01:42 PM
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,008
|
Anyone got a good brine solution recipe? I've never saved the skins...but I think its time to learn & stock up on em before its to late! I plan on using the eelbob & skin swimmer method next season.
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 01:55 PM
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,649
|
This is going to get ugly before it is over.
The classic fishery scientist:
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 02:12 PM
|
#30
|
Gone Dark
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Buzzards Bay
Posts: 512
|
MotoX- I read one on this site before. run a search for eel bob. I think it was plastic jar-mix water with kosher salt until it dissolves then freeze .
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.
|
| |