|
Considering that the story is released by the NY Times, The Democratic Party official newsletter, it's a safe bet it's true. The NY Times isn't known for smearing the Clintons.
If true, it's one more example of lies and controversy form a repugnant, morally bankrupt clan that does whatever they want, and gets offended when they are questioned about anything.
Hilary just went on a "blame the rich for stacking the deck against us" tour, as if she's not one of the rich. If this story is true, well, she wouldn't be the first politician to whore herself out for money. But what gets me is the smug way in which she decries the way the deck is stacked in favor of the rich, and at the same time, engages in that very behavior.
This family has no morals whatsoever, and their hypocrisy is limitless. They, like the Kennedys, are made of Bush anti-matter.
And while influence-peddling isn't uncommon, it's not every day a politician takes money where something like uranium is concerned. If the product in question was rubber duckies, it would still be a legitimate scandal. The fact that the scandal involves giving uranium to an adversarial nation, is really breathtaking.
I still don't think she's beatable in either the primary of the general. If this story is true, we're going to elect a POTUS who at best took a kickback (at worst took a bribe) to get uranium into the hands of Russia. Spence, Paul S, go ahead and defend that...
|
Threaded Mode