Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Sure, continue to contain and work towards a coup. As bad a regime Saddam's was, the fact is he wasn't really able to hurt anyone beyond his own borders and most of his country hated him.
It's not a perfect solution for sure, but far better than the path that was chosen.
YOU DON"T KNOW THIS
-spence
|
he was funding terrorist organizations...OUTSIDE HIS BORDERS
in every country suffering under a dictator' oppression "most of his country hated(hates) him.," this is the exactly the case...you are so naieve...
in the late 90's when it served the dems/left NBC was running stories on Saddam with his picture side by side with Hitler's during their news cast and making all of the comparisons.....SOMETHING CHANGED????? From Hitler to Santa Clause in like 4 years...
"contain and work toward a coup"...let's see...Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba, shall I continue....where exactly has the "contain and cause a coup" ever worked? how about "contain and ignore the threat and suffering" that's the UN model.... which is why we have NK and Iran as a current pain in the A#$.....
Threaded Mode