Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetwater
This wall street journal article is a "Must Read."
|
Why?
The author obviously has a bone to pick with the people named in the email story, and is known to have been funded in the past by the energy industry.
The AP just did a review of every single email in this controversy, and concluded there wasn't much scientific substance to the claims aside that Mann was a bit of a prick.
I've read a lot about this issue, and to think a few people could strong arm the science of thousands of experts globally sure takes more faith than even a blind Al Gore disciple.
We can file this under "nothing new".
-spence
Threaded Mode