Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
"They" were not "the people" acting by Constitutional Convention. Judicial "interpretations" can, as in this case, be erroneous. And they can be overturned or made null by later decisions. They are not as immutable as constitutional text. And even if that line you speak of were truly and constitutionally drawn, then your semi auto high velocity "assault" weapons would not be prohibited by that line.
|
You're just highlighting the problem with the amendment as it is written. I agree though, we should scrap it and amend.
Threaded Mode