Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I certainly don't think I'm morally superior to anyone bc of some label. It is more based on the action of others. When I see people with the belief that when some people do something to help people less fortunate than themselves it is only so they will vote for that party, I do consider myself morally superior to them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"When I see people with the belief that when some people do something to help people less fortunate than themselves "
Oh, please. Sandra Fluke was a student at the Georgetown University School Of Law, and she needs me to pay for her condoms? She's "less fortunate" than we are?
This isn't about charity, because there is no "needs test" to qualify for teh free contraception - under the ACA, everyone gets free contraception, not just poor people.
You are suggesting that if i opose handing out free contraception to everyone (including billionaires), that it's because I have no sympathy for those who deserve sympathy?
Wrong. My opposition to this has nothing to do with lack of sympathy. It has everything to do with the constitution.
We're not talking about giving food to starving kids here. Let's put this debate in the proper context.
Threaded Mode