| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
10-17-2015, 10:32 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
|
This is from March. How many more have been released? How many stories of missing emails have been pulled back? Reading online quite a few.
And given the revelations of the last week as to the true nature of the investigation I'm not sure I'd believe anything Trey Gowdy says. How much of the poor reporting do you think came from misleading leaks from his investigation?
This is a completely different topic. I said the DOJ remarked it was legal. Your post is that Obama's remarks rankeled the FBI if there was a possible security breech.
I'm shocked, shocked that Clinton would have any communication with a longtime friend and confidant.
About the only thing here that could have legs is the naming of a covert CIA agent, but the source of that leak at the CIA is now deceased. Otherwise all you've got is a lot of shoulda coulda woulda.
Last edited by spence; 10-19-2015 at 10:29 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-18-2015, 05:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,289
|
And that, Spence, is why the FBI does its investigation - hopefully without external pressures.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2015, 09:06 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
And that, Spence, is why the FBI does its investigation - hopefully without external pressures.
|
Such as Obama saying the accusation is politically motivated, rather than valid. I'm sure the FBI loved that. The guy can't ever shut his yap - always wrong, yet never in doubt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2015, 10:08 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Such as Obama saying the accusation is politically motivated, rather than valid. I'm sure the FBI loved that. The guy can't ever shut his yap - always wrong, yet never in doubt.
|
The fact that you and other republicans are so interested in this investigation proves at the very least that your interest is politically motivated. 
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2015, 11:04 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The fact that you and other republicans are so interested in this investigation proves at the very least that your interest is politically motivated.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Nebe, i don't beleieve she has testified under oath, yet, abiytthe attack. I am interested in hearing her side of the story. Is that political? I don't think so.
My side doesn't need manufactured evidence of why she's nowhere near fit to be POTUS, the facts speak for themselves.
She claimed that Bill didn't cheat on her, but rather, he was the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
Consider that. If she genuinely believes that Bill was framed by the GOP, she's too stupid for the job. If she doesn't believe it, but said it for political purposes, then she's too dishonest for the job.
If there's a 3rd possibility, well, I am all ears.
Then there's that whole "on a trip to Bosnia, I had to DIVE into the trucks because I came under sniper fire." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2015, 09:33 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Nebe, i don't beleieve she has testified under oath, yet, abiytthe attack. I am interested in hearing her side of the story. Is that political? I don't think so.
My side doesn't need manufactured evidence of why she's nowhere near fit to be POTUS, the facts speak for themselves.
She claimed that Bill didn't cheat on her, but rather, he was the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
Consider that. If she genuinely believes that Bill was framed by the GOP, she's too stupid for the job. If she doesn't believe it, but said it for political purposes, then she's too dishonest for the job.
If there's a 3rd possibility, well, I am all ears.
Then there's that whole "on a trip to Bosnia, I had to DIVE into the trucks because I came under sniper fire."
|
In regards to her saying that he didn't cheat on her and it was a conspiracy- maybe a better way of saying it would have been that he was seduced. I'm with you though..I don't think she would make a good president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2015, 10:29 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
About the only thing here that could have legs is the naming of a covert CIA agent, but the source of that leak at the CIA is now deceased. Otherwise all you've got is a lot of shoulda coulda woulda.
|
Or not. This weekend we learned the CIA said the name wasn't even classified. Why would Gowdy redact it from the email unless they were trying to give the impression ... ... ... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.
|
| |
