|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-27-2016, 07:24 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
we dropped the bomb on Japan because we did not see them as we saw our European brothers we saw them as inferior .. we interned fellow americans because of their yellow skin and to show the russian's
who declared war on japan August 8, 1945, be dropped the last bomb August 9, the U.S. dropped a plutonium implosion-type bomb (Fat Man) on the city of Nagasaki. and uranium gun-type atomic bomb (Little Boy)
think what you want this was a field test
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 07:29 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
we dropped the bomb on Japan because we did not see them as we saw our European brothers we saw them as inferior .. we interned fellow americans because of their yellow skin and to show the russian's
|
That doesn't explain Dresden...
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:46 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That doesn't explain Dresden...
|
the intent of bombing dresden wasn't to test a new weapon ..
The bombing and the resulting firestorm destroyed over 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the city centre.[2] An estimated 22,700[3] to 25,000[4] people were killed.
67 Japanese Cities Firebombed in World War II
http://www.ditext.com/japan/napalm.html
Name of Japanese
city firebombed Percentage of the
city destroyed Equivalent in size to
the following American city
Yokohama 58 Cleveland
Tokyo 51 New York
Toyama 99 Chattanooga
Nagoya 40 Los Angeles
Osaka 35.1 Chicago
Nishinomiya 11.9 Cambridge
Siumonoseki 37.6 San Diego
Kure 41.9 Toledo
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 04:52 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
the intent of bombing dresden wasn't to test a new weapon ..
The bombing and the resulting firestorm destroyed over 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the city centre.[2] An estimated 22,700[3] to 25,000[4] people were killed.
67 Japanese Cities Firebombed in World War II
http://www.ditext.com/japan/napalm.html
Name of Japanese
city firebombed Percentage of the
city destroyed Equivalent in size to
the following American city
Yokohama 58 Cleveland
Tokyo 51 New York
Toyama 99 Chattanooga
Nagoya 40 Los Angeles
Osaka 35.1 Chicago
Nishinomiya 11.9 Cambridge
Siumonoseki 37.6 San Diego
Kure 41.9 Toledo
|
WDMSO, are you under the impression that we decided on our own, to pick on Japan in 1942?
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:57 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
WDMSO, are you under the impression that we decided on our own, to pick on Japan in 1942?
|
I have no issues in what was done to japan to include the bomb or germany during war its about winning and i wasn't fighting that war those who were did what they felt best for the country.. i just am not blinded by patriotism or nationalism that 71 years later things should be viewed through the same 1942 lens ... its not revisionist history people had reservations then
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistle...b&pagenumber=1
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
I have no issues in what was done to japan to include the bomb or germany during war its about winning and i wasn't fighting that war those who were did what they felt best for the country.. i just am not blinded by patriotism or nationalism that 71 years later things should be viewed through the same 1942 lens ... its not revisionist history people had reservations then
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistle...b&pagenumber=1
|
Yes, we had reservations.
But it wasn't an evil act, and for Obama to say it was...he's a village idiot, we elected the village idiot.
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 04:24 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Yes, we had reservations.
But it wasn't an evil act, and for Obama to say it was...he's a village idiot, we elected the village idiot.
|
Jim, he never said that.
You need help.
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:50 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That doesn't explain Dresden...
|
the intent of bombing dresden wasn't to test a new weapon ..
The bombing and the resulting firestorm destroyed over 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the city centre.[2] An estimated 22,700[3] to 25,000[4] people were killed.
Within the first two to four months of the bombings, the acute effects of the atomic bombings killed 90,000–146,000 people in Hiroshima and 39,000–80,000 in Nagasaki; roughly half of the deaths in each city occurred on the first day.
and lets look at all the data that came after the war and how it advanced or knowledge of radiation fall out and effects of the bomb
67 Japanese Cities Firebombed in World War II
http://www.ditext.com/japan/napalm.html
Name of Japanese
city firebombed Percentage of the
city destroyed Equivalent in size to
the following American city
Yokohama 58 Cleveland
Tokyo 51 New York
Toyama 99 Chattanooga
Nagoya 40 Los Angeles
Osaka 35.1 Chicago
Nishinomiya 11.9 Cambridge
Siumonoseki 37.6 San Diego
Kure 41.9 Toledo
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 09:49 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
we dropped the bomb on Japan because we did not see them as we saw our European brothers we saw them as inferior .. we interned fellow americans because of their yellow skin and to show the russian's
who declared war on japan August 8, 1945, be dropped the last bomb August 9, the U.S. dropped a plutonium implosion-type bomb (Fat Man) on the city of Nagasaki. and uranium gun-type atomic bomb (Little Boy)
think what you want this was a field test
|
"we dropped the bomb on Japan because we did not see them as we saw our European brothers "
That could be. Or it could be (and in fact it is) that we bombed Japan, and not Germany...because when we bombed Hiroshima in August 1945, Germany had already surrendered (in May 1945). In fact, the surrender of Germany happened before we even tested the bomb in New Mexico (July 1945), so there was no reason to bomb Germany in August 1945?
"we saw them as inferior"
Because they were inferior. Vastly, vastly inferior. Read the Rape Of Nanking. Or Flyboys.
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:20 PM
|
#10
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
That could be. Or it could be (and in fact it is) that we bombed Japan, and not Germany...because when we bombed Hiroshima in August 1945, Germany had already surrendered (in May 1945). In fact, the surrender of Germany happened before we even tested the bomb in New Mexico (July 1945), so there was no reason to bomb Germany in August 1945?.
|
Damn those blasted timelines......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:42 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Damn those blasted timelines......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
who needs timelines when you have a narrative? 
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:46 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
we dropped the bomb on Japan because we did not see them as we saw our European brothers we saw them as inferior .. we interned fellow americans because of their yellow skin and to show the russian's
think what you want this was a field test
|
sounds like Spence thinks we dropped evil with the best of intentions and you think we dropped evil with bad intentions and racist, bigoted motivations...you two should discuss proper use of evil... 
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:56 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
sounds like Spence thinks we dropped evil with the best of intentions and you think we dropped evil with bad intentions and racist, bigoted motivations...you two should discuss proper use of evil... 
|
no we dropped it to test a new weapon in hind sight you could say it was an evil act I am not suggesting that at all but It wasn't done just to end the war it might have been part of it but not the sole reason
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 04:53 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
It wasn't done just to end the war it might have been part of it but not the sole reason
|
What do you base that on, if I may ask?
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 11:36 AM
|
#15
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,273
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
What do you base that on, if I may ask?
|
He's correct - the primary reason was to encourage the Japanese to end the war (and saving millions of lives, American, Chinese, Indo-China, Korean, and yes, Japanese too).
It was also intended to influence the Soviets, and hedge their thoughts of invasion of Japan, But that is considered an influential but not deciding factor. Remember - Truman did not initially know of the bomb until shortly before
Missing in this discussion is that Germany and Japan both had Atomic weapons programs and had their efforts been more fruitful and advanced, things might have been a lot different.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 12:02 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
He's correct .
|
it's hard to be wrong stating the obvious "not the sole reason"....I think the rub is the suggestion that we did it to "field test" a weapon of mass destruction on folks("inferiors") that we didn't necessarily mind mass destroying(women, children and the like) simply because they didn't look like us or our "european brothers"....
Last edited by scottw; 05-28-2016 at 02:54 PM..
|
|
|
|
05-28-2016, 03:25 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
it's hard to be wrong stating the obvious "not the sole reason"....I think the rub is the suggestion that we did it to "field test" a weapon of mass destruction on folks("inferiors") that we didn't necessarily mind mass destroying(women, children and the like) simply because they didn't look like us or our "european brothers"....
|
As unpalatable as that may be by todays standard .... I strongly feel thats exactly what we did... most of the propaganda of that time reflects that believe
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.
|
| |