Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW
If I heard correctly - since his first trial is in appeal it vacates the conviction and makes any testimony from that trial inadmissale in a civil trial.
My only guess is he wanted his daughter to stand a chance in getting the remainder of his money instead of Lloyd's family.
Tired of hearing about it- so I tune it out so it may be slightly off but that's how I understand it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I think you are correct. The thing not to forget is that the family can still sue him in a civil trial and the burden of his proof in the civil court is less then in criminal court so they probably would win. I think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Hybrid Mode
