|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
12-05-2017, 09:19 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Spence, if the leaked emails revealed no unethical actions, than the leak couldn't have cost Hilary the election. if the emails only revealed (again) her yoga schedule and Chelsea's wedding plans, then there was no harm.
If, however, the leaked email shed light on actions that turned the public off, then most of the blame lies with Hilary for behaving that way, not with the person who broke the true story.
|
I think the debate question was one or two things about her debate with Sanders. Wrong but big whoop.
Trump then lies and claims it was hurting him...it just stirs the pot and nobody knows what's for dinner.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 09:59 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think the debate question was one or two things about her debate with Sanders. Wrong but big whoop.
Trump then lies and claims it was hurting him...it just stirs the pot and nobody knows what's for dinner.
|
Wrong, it was a debate with Trump.
So the media conspiring to influence the outcome of a presidential election, is no big deal to you. But the public learning the truth about what team Hilary did during the campaign, THAT concerns you. Well that makes all kinds of sense.
Everyone who thinks Spence would still think it was no big deal if they gave debate questions ahead of time to the republican candidate, raise your hand? Anyone?
"Trump then lies and claims it was hurting him"
The media is serially unfair to him.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 01:53 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Wrong, it was a debate with Trump.
So the media conspiring to influence the outcome of a presidential election, is no big deal to you. But the public learning the truth about what team Hilary did during the campaign, THAT concerns you. Well that makes all kinds of sense.
Everyone who thinks Spence would still think it was no big deal if they gave debate questions ahead of time to the republican candidate, raise your hand? Anyone?
"Trump then lies and claims it was hurting him"
The media is serially unfair to him.
|
Please for once fact check yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 01:58 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Please for once fact check yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So Donna Brazile, as an employee of CNN, didn't sneak a debate question to her preferred presidential candidate, in the hopes of helping her win? Yes or no?
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 02:41 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
So Donna Brazile, as an employee of CNN, didn't sneak a debate question to her preferred presidential candidate, in the hopes of helping her win? Yes or no?
|
Not against Trump.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 04:32 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
did the democrats just vote to impeach trump for
"high misdemeanors" ?
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 06:30 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Not against Trump.
|
You are correct, it was against Bernie. How is it not an act that undermines the democratic process? I guess your side doesn’t give a fig about that, or they wouldn’t have superdelegates used theyvway you use them, the sole purpose of which is to reverse the democratic process if the DNC leaders don’t happen to like the way it turned out.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 07:15 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You are correct, it was against Bernie. How is it not an act that undermines the democratic process? I guess your side doesn’t give a fig about that, or they wouldn’t have superdelegates used theyvway you use them, the sole purpose of which is to reverse the democratic process if the DNC leaders don’t happen to like the way it turned out.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I don't see how a democratic operative telling a democratic candidate about a single town hall debate topic is "undermining our democratic process." It's a bit of foul play on Brazile's part but statistically insignificant as far as the debates were concerned.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.
|
| |