|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-28-2018, 11:35 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
I'm not the only one.
People have thrown rocks forever.
|
Common ground I guess🤪
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 12:14 PM
|
#2
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Common ground I guess🤪
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
If he admits he's stupid. I'll gladly take one for the team 
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 11:07 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Spence, not just letting in a huge number of un-vetted people who have shown a propensity at least of trespassing and destroying property, is “exactly the wrong way to go about it”?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 05:45 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Originally Posted by detbuch
Lack of character? You want to talk about lack of character? People who throw rocks at other people who are not doing anything to them don't show the character of anyone I want coming here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So you either support the use of deadly force on all people in all events where things are thrown at police or you do not it's not a hard choice .
It would be helpful if you actually read the posts you respond to. I said nothing about deadly force. Although, I suppose, a well placed rock could kill someone. But, because it was a rock, not a gun, I'm guessing you wouldn't consider it deadly force. And I didn't say anything about making a choice, hard or easy.
Maybe you were talking to somebody else? Or maybe you merely didn't have a clear idea, a cogent thought, a shred of awareness, about what you were saying.
Or do you support this simply because of who they are are and where they are from
Again, where do you get that I support "this" or anything else? Again, pay attention. Read the actual words before your eyes, not the pre-conceived ones floating in your skull, waiting to pounce them out at whoever crosses your path.
Actually, I did make an implication about "who they are".
But not about where they are from. Is that another ready made slander lurking in your "world view" to blindly hurl at someone who has said nothing about ethnicity? At someone whom you have no knowledge about where he stands on the matter? Is that a sort of finisher, a coup de grâce to convincingly prove the merit of your argument and the ugly bias of your opponent? If so, it is a particularly deceitful and disgusting tactic to use in a civilized discussion.
As to "who they are," I clearly and specifically said "People who throw rocks at other people who are not doing anything to them". And about them that they "don't show the character of anyone I want coming here."
Now if you want to comment on what I actually said, that might be of interest.
its sad that our troops in Afghanistan wouldn't shoot people who throw rocks in a combat zone .. yet some American here see no issue with the idea ... must be that MAGA thing 
|
Are you're equating the border situation to a combat zone? That implies that the "caravan" is more of a forceful attempt to enter the U.S. (invasion?) rather than a peaceful attempt, by mostly innocent women and children who are accompanied by some men.
Last edited by detbuch; 11-28-2018 at 05:53 PM..
|
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 07:46 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Originally Posted by detbuch
Lack of character? You want to talk about lack of character? People who throw rocks at other people who are not doing anything to them don't show the character of anyone I want coming here.
Are you're equating the border situation to a combat zone? That implies that the "caravan" is more of a forceful attempt to enter the U.S. (invasion?) rather than a peaceful attempt, by mostly innocent women and children who are accompanied by some men.
|
clearly the opposite.. and if you cant see the difference I cant help you
|
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 08:15 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
clearly the opposite.. and if you cant see the difference I cant help you
|
You're the one that brought up "combat zone" in relation to the situation at the border. Maybe you can be more clear how you compare the border thing with an Afghan "combat zone."
Trump said lethal force was acceptable IF NECESSARY. I don't believe he said it was OK just because people were throwing rocks. Did our troops shoot people in Afghanistan IF IT WAS NECESSARY?
Apparently, Mattis has it under his control. I think he knows what he is doing.
The memo written by Chief of Staff Kelly (not Trump) states that troops may "perform those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary," if there is "credible evidence and intelligence," including "a show or use of force (including lethal force, where necessary), crowd control, temporary detention, and cursory search."
Beware of fake news.
Last edited by detbuch; 11-28-2018 at 08:35 PM..
|
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 08:52 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
leftist narrative "facts" train must not be derailed ...whooo...whooo
|
|
|
|
11-29-2018, 07:37 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Trump said lethal force was acceptable IF NECESSARY. I don't believe he said it was OK just because people were throwing rocks. Did our troops shoot people in Afghanistan IF IT WAS NECESSARY?
Apparently, Mattis has it under his control. I think he knows what he is doing.
.
|
Well rocks were thrown, and no one was shot. So it would appear Trump didn't give a direct order.
|
|
|
|
11-29-2018, 11:39 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
You're the one that brought up "combat zone" in relation to the situation at the border. Maybe you can be more clear how you compare the border thing with an Afghan "combat zone."
Trump said lethal force was acceptable IF NECESSARY. I don't believe he said it was OK just because people were throwing rocks. Did our troops shoot people in Afghanistan IF IT WAS NECESSARY?
Apparently, Mattis has it under his control. I think he knows what he is doing.
The memo written by Chief of Staff Kelly (not Trump) states that troops may "perform those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary," if there is "credible evidence and intelligence," including "a show or use of force (including lethal force, where necessary), crowd control, temporary detention, and cursory search."
Beware of fake news.
|
Consider it a rifle," trump said. "When they throw rocks like they did at the Mexico military police, consider it a rifle."
Sure he walked it back but it’s a full time job for his staff but that’s really the point
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-29-2018, 12:40 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
wait....the left considers words ..."weapons"...but rocks aren't?
|
|
|
|
11-28-2018, 09:30 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
I love his passion but no,the facts don’t support him.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.
|
| |