Is it getting hot in the kitchen Donald?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so if the money that trump used to pay off mistresses is a campaign contribution that must be disclosed, how bout the slush funds set up for congressmen to do the same exact thing? why isn’t the
media demanding that the congressmen who spent that money to pay off
mistresses, be indicted as well?

Congress had a slush fund for this exact purpose.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

. What a suprise it’s not a slush fund ... seems you were fed bad info.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/co...ally-harassed/


This system grows out of a 1995 law, known as the Congressional Accountability Act,

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

. What a suprise it’s not a slush fund ... seems you were fed bad info.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/co...ally-harassed/


This system grows out of a 1995 law, known as the Congressional Accountability Act,

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well according to the right wing nuts at CNN, the Office Of Compliance has paid $17 million to sexual harassment victims since its creation. That's taxpayer money.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/16/polit...ent/index.html

WDMSO, please tell us, if Trumps payoff to his mistress is legally a campaign contribution, why aren't the payouts from the office of compliance, also a campaign contribution? Please explain the difference?



Also, if Trump buys toothpaste or gets a haircut, does he need to disclose that money as a self-financed campaign contribution? Is everything that impacts appearance or image, now a campaign contribution that must be disclosed?