|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
12-31-2018, 04:53 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...017/924316002/
Homeland Security: More than 600,000 foreigners overstayed U.S. visas in 2017
here is reality Trump and his administration have focused far more on building a wall along the southern border with Mexico,
why would that be??????
|
Your article points out, rather quietly, that Trump addressed the overstay problem, and that the numbers have gone down since 2016.
Why do you say that the administration has focused far more on building a wall? It focused on the overstay and Congress has quietly implemented, as your article states, the "biometric entry-exit tracking system that would better monitor foreigners who legally visit the United States. Completion of that system, which uses fingerprints and iris scans to more accurately capture when people enter and exit the country, was included in an executive order he signed shortly after being sworn in as president."
But Congress is not cooperating on the wall, that's why the focus seems to be so large on building the wall.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2019, 07:56 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Your article points out, rather quietly, that Trump addressed the overstay problem, and that the numbers have gone down since 2016.
Why do you say that the administration has focused far more on building a wall? It focused on the overstay and Congress has quietly implemented, as your article states, the "biometric entry-exit tracking system that would better monitor foreigners who legally visit the United States. Completion of that system, which uses fingerprints and iris scans to more accurately capture when people enter and exit the country, was included in an executive order he signed shortly after being sworn in as president."
But Congress is not cooperating on the wall, that's why the focus seems to be so large on building the wall.
|
Despite those gradual improvements, the report acknowledges that there is "no specific cause that can be directly attributed to the decrease in overstay rates" in 2017. Guess you missed that
and executive orders once deemed bad are not a replacement for legislation .. which some how could not be passed by his own party ...
|
|
|
|
01-01-2019, 12:02 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Despite those gradual improvements, the report acknowledges that there is "no specific cause that can be directly attributed to the decrease in overstay rates" in 2017. Guess you missed that
No I didn't miss that. I also did not miss that the administration addressed the problem and that the overstay rates decreased. "Specific" causes often cannot be verified. If you cannot verify a specific cause then you cannot specifically say that desired results are not caused by an implemented policy. If you don't know why the good thing happened, you cannot categorically say that it was not the result of the policy.
Of course, if you want to slant in the direction that the policy was not the cause, you can weasel word your denial by saying that you cannot "attribute" the connection, rather than definitively saying that the policy was absolutely not the cause.
I responded to your accusation or implication that Trump was focusing "far more" on the wall and why was that so. The administration addressed the overstay problem, and the problem decreased. Spin it however you want, but the fact remains.
and executive orders once deemed bad are not a replacement for legislation .. which some how could not be passed by his own party ...
|
His party did pass wall funding in the House. The Senate required the other party's help--which was not given.
And executive orders are bad or wrong only when they order something that does not fall within the purview of Article 2 of the Constitution. That is still the case, regardless of who trespasses that restraint, nor of which party allows it to stand. Unfortunately, party power concerns and judicial corruption and inertia have been letting the abuse stand.
That's one of the reasons that the Constitution is barely hanging on, as they say, by a thread--or a few threads.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.
|
| |