|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-26-2019, 12:33 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Heard this on the radio
Since when is the media expected to have the exact same outcome as a 2 year investigation with almost zero leaks
The 2 are not again remotely the same but once a gain some want us to think the same standard exists in both
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the media is supposed to be fair and honest, not totally in the tank for one side.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 12:46 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,384
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the media is supposed to be fair and honest, not totally in the tank for one side.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
thats your tinfoil conservative Hat speaking because you're a one source news person If you watched any kind of news it was always questionable whether or not he was gonna be convicted of collusion. or if there was collusion there was no reporting of certainty.. But of course you don't have a problem with bar selling the the notion that there was no obstruction even though he penned a letter so many months prior to getting the AG job indicating just that... and what did he base that decision on? where is the evidence? that he used .there was no obstruction of Justice ..based on . What legal standard was applied to that decision ? not enough evidence ,? that needs to be explained to the American public . And of muller said there was not enough to indite or absolve trump of the question of obstruction of Justice how did Barr Come to such a decision in such a rapid timeframe. And not to worrie it wont take trump long to create another st imposed crisis =1] Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/size]
Last edited by wdmso; 03-26-2019 at 12:58 PM..
|
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 12:51 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
that your tinfoil conservative Hat speaking because you're a one source news person If you watched any kind of news it was always questionable whether or not he was gonna be convicted of collusion or if there was collusion there was no reporting of certainty.. But of course you don't have a problem with bar selling the the notion that there was no obstruction even though he penned a letter so many months prior to getting the AG job indicating say just that... And all without he based that on where is the evidence that he based that there was no obstruction of Justice based on what
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
you think i’m the only one who no longer trusts the media? look at the approval ratings if the media. sorry, it’s not just me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 01:06 PM
|
#4
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
you think i’m the only one who no longer trusts the media? look at the approval ratings if the media. sorry, it’s not just me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
https://www.acsh.org/news/2018/09/11...st-media-13399
According to a new bombshell report released by Gallup and the Knight Foundation, 94% of Republicans have lost some trust in the media. They aren't alone; 75% of independents and even 42% of Democrats say the same thing. Overall, nearly 7 in 10 adults report a loss of faith in the news. What is going on?

|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 12:57 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
that your tinfoil conservative Hat speaking because you're a one source news person If you watched any kind of news it was always questionable whether or not he was gonna be convicted of collusion or if there was collusion there was no reporting of certainty.. But of course you don't have a problem with bar selling the the notion that there was no obstruction even though he penned a letter so many months prior to getting the AG job indicating say just that... and what did he base that decision on? where is the evidence that he used that there was no obstruction of Justice ..based . What legal standard wad applied to that decision not enough evidence Did meet the threshold that needs to be explained to the American public . And of moller said there was not enough evidence to convict or absolve trump of the question I'm obstruction of Justice how did Barr Come to such a decision in such a rapid timeframe=1]Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/size]
|
if you think that the notion of a biased media is a republican hoax, have someone read this to you. this is a Gallup poll.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/195542/...s-new-low.aspx
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 01:40 PM
|
#6
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,429
|
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 04:49 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,302
|
Tucker Carlson isn't he the hero of the white nationalist movement?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2019, 06:13 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
What that had to do with Trump is the question,they should look into it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.
|
| |