Is Lindsey's spine regenerating?

[Jim in CT]

Pete -

"Obama wisely picked women to nominate "

Trump's next pick (if he fills another seat) will likely be Amy Barrett, and wait until we see how the libs treat her...that will dispel the notion that democrats have a monopoly on chivalry.

"neither had any dirt to find"

And we see again your naked bias. Whereas every time theres a story about dirt on Trump, you post 900 articles supporting the theory. But you have no clue, apparently about Sotomayor.

Here is what Sotomayor said about female Latina judges, on more than one occasion..."a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion"

So in her opinion, ethnicity and gender determine one's ability to be a skilled jurist. Things that no one has any control over.

Also, Sotomayor wrote 5 opinions while on the 2nd Court of Appeals. Three of her opinions, 60%, were overturned by the higher court. So she was found to be wrong on the law, 60% of the time. That deserves a promotion?

You've been annihilated here.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...s-fodder-to-f/

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Pete -

"Obama wisely picked women to nominate "

Trump's next pick (if he fills another seat) will likely be Amy Barrett, and wait until we see how the libs treat her...that will dispel the notion that democrats have a monopoly on chivalry.

"neither had any dirt to find"

And we see again your naked bias. Whereas every time theres a story about dirt on Trump, you post 900 articles supporting the theory. But you have no clue, apparently about Sotomayor.

Here is what Sotomayor said about female Latina judges, on more than one occasion..."a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion"

So in her opinion, ethnicity and gender determine one's ability to be a skilled jurist. Things that no one has any control over.

Also, Sotomayor wrote 5 opinions while on the 2nd Court of Appeals. Three of her opinions, 60%, were overturned by the higher court. So she was found to be wrong on the law, 60% of the time. That deserves a promotion?

You've been annihilated here.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...s-fodder-to-f/

Quite the definitive source you have there.
Disagreeing with her opinions is fine and is not dirt.

Once again you’re butthurt about I like beer Kavanaugh
Trump is the issue
Claiming that he has it worse than any President ever is bs

Now the king from mar a lago is going to get foreign governments to pay him to go to his failing doral resort and that’s not a violation of the emoluments clause.
And as far as Syria goes, here’s where we are at with the great dealmaker
Turkey overruns the positions with withdrew from, we don’t do the sanctions after all, and we … thank them for agreeing to it?
Biggest loser ever

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device