IG report

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So you ... have come to a definitive conclusion based on someone else's opinion and a small portion of Horowitz's testimony.

?

Just based on Howowitz's testimony. I didn't read one word of the report. I saw a fait amount of his testimony.

When you conclude from watching testimony that Trump committed an impeachable offense, that's un unassailable fact. When I post direct, exact quotes of what Horowitz said, I'm merely posting wild and invalid conclusions.

In other words, as always with you...

liberal=good, conservative=bad. No exceptions, not ever.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Just based on Howowitz's testimony. I didn't read one word of the report. I saw a fait amount of his testimony.

When you conclude from watching testimony that Trump committed an impeachable offense, that's un unassailable fact. When I post direct, exact quotes of what Horowitz said, I'm merely posting wild and invalid conclusions.

In other words, as always with you...

liberal=good, conservative=bad. No exceptions, not ever.

You picked several sentences out of 6 Hours of testimony that you personally read/observed or you’re repeating talking points pushed by people that fit your narrative.
Keep defending without question your hero
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You picked several sentences out of 6 Hours of testimony that you personally read/observed or you’re repeating talking points pushed by people that fit your narrative.
Keep defending without question your hero
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Correct, I posted a few specific quotes. Maybe you would have posted a transcript of the entire 6 hours. I choose to limit it to the highlights.

Did I misquote him? Did he reverse himself later on, and retract the things I quoted? No he did not.