Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Do you think attorneys take work based on their political views?
Or do you believe that she enabled and abetted Travelers in defrauding the claimants? That she misrepresented something to the court?
She has made a couple million in the last 30 years in private practice.
That's not a very good salary for any category leading attorney.
She claims to be a capitalist, but she certainly gets under your skin and makes you shriek. Take a Midol.
|
"Do you think her salary at Harvard compared to what she could make in a firm as one of the leading lawyers in her field'
It was reported she made $400k for teaching one, single class. That's a good gig. Good enough where she wanted it bad enough, to commit fraud on her application, and exploit the atrocities against Native Americans, to get it.
"Oh, I forgot, education is a calling and you should work for free"
You missed the point COMPLETELY. If she wants to get paid $400k to teach one class, and students want to pay the massive tuition to fund that, that's their business, it's a free country. But she has no right to then claim that it's wrong to profit from student debt. That's the point. If she can get rich from students going into debt, so can anyone else. Sorry if that went over your head.
Unless you're saying, as she is saying, that she has a right to get rich off of student loans, but no one else does? Why does she have a right to live differently than anyone else?
Your response was a weak dodge.
Threaded Mode