So I was looking for the White Power Nazi Military Thread

[Sea Dangles]

He adds nothing but hate and vitriolic posturing.
A POS like Paul is the reason why wa need a Presidential correction.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

He adds nothing but hate and vitriolic posturing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Mr. irrelevant.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

A POS like Paul is the reason why wa need a Presidential correction.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Classy guy.

[JohnR]

No sand, Paul. You are the one brushing some cadets as Tiki Torch carriers.

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

He adds nothing but hate and vitriolic posturing.
A POS like Paul is the reason why wa need a Presidential correction.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Met Paul numerous times, not a POS at all. Difference in position, yes, POS not at all.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Met Paul numerous times, not a POS at all. Difference in position, yes, POS not at all.

POS means "Pal On SB"

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

He adds nothing but hate and vitriolic posturing.
A POS like Paul is the reason why wa need a Presidential correction.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Will just leave this here...

[wdmso]

it's all a grand conspiracy against white people.is that it? . nothing in a conservatives world can mean more than one thing..?

So the ok sign can't be used by white supremacists and still be used as intended as ok or (I am all right )


https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ght-wing-troll


Dismissing the spread of the hand signal as a hoax overlooks two hard realities: first, that its increasing use gives open license to actual racist ideologues to operate and recruit under the cover of the “plausible deniability” established by less ideological young trolls; and second, that any kind of wink-and-nudge interaction with the racist right is a direct route to its normalization.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

it's all a grand conspiracy against white people.is that it? . nothing in a conservatives world can mean more than one thing..?

So the ok sign can't be used by white supremacists and still be used as intended as ok or (I am all right )

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ght-wing-troll


Dismissing the spread of the hand signal as a hoax overlooks two hard realities: first, that its increasing use gives open license to actual racist ideologues to operate and recruit under the cover of the “plausible deniability” established by less ideological young trolls; and second, that any kind of wink-and-nudge interaction with the racist right is a direct route to its normalization.

No, just a temper tantrum from the left in response to getting creamed in an election they thought was in the bag.

I'll tell the superintendant in my town that all the schools need to be investigated, because at every single bus stop, you'll see 8 year-olds playing the same exact circle game that these kids were playing. What deplorable racists.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

No, just a temper tantrum from the left in response to getting creamed in an election they thought was in the bag.

I'll tell the superintendant in my town that all the schools need to be investigated, because at every single bus stop, you'll see 8 year-olds playing the same exact circle game that these kids were playing. What deplorable racists.

See - more insults from the right - and yet you claim the left is having a temper tantrum or is angry. You don't see those type of insults from the people on the left here.

Tell the super. that and come back and let us know what he says.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

See - more insults from right - and yet you claim the left is having a temper tantrum or is angry. You don't see those type of insults from the people on the left here.

Tell the super. that and come back and let us know what he says.

It was intended to be an insult - a very valid insult, with all kinds of evidence to back it up.

"you claim the left is having a temper tantrum"

I'm stating a fact. I'm not angry. Just stating a fact. I don't generally get angry when my opponents act in a way that increases my chances of winning. That makes me happy, not angry. Many, many times here you've accused me of being angry. It's a desperate hail mary on your part, when you can't refute what I'm saying, nor can you admit I have a point.

The super would laugh in my face. Good for him.

There's a time for genuine, principled outrage. When kids flashing the OK sign sends you all into a frothing fit, maybe ask why that is. Or keep doing it. It's working wonders, which explains why republicans haven't won any elections anywhere since the left began this tactic in the late 2000's. In response, naturally, to getting humiliated, that time by Bush.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

It was intended to be an insult - a very valid insult, with all kinds of evidence to back it up.

"you claim the left is having a temper tantrum"

I'm stating a fact. I'm not angry. You come across that way - constantly insulting people. Just stating a fact. I don't generally get angry when my opponents act in a way that increases my chances of winning. That makes me happy, not angry. Many, many times here you've accused me of being angry. It's a desperate hail mary on your part, when you can't refute what I'm saying, nor can you admit I have a point.

The super would laugh in my face. Good for him. Then why mention it when no one has EVER suggested that.

There's a time for genuine, principled outrage. When kids flashing the OK sign sends you all into a frothing fit, maybe ask why that is. Or keep doing it. It's working wonders, which explains why republicans haven't won any elections anywhere since the left began this tactic in the late 2000's. In response, naturally, to getting humiliated, that time by Bush.

If the post below isn't considered angry, you need to get some help to determine what angry is.

vague insults from a little
twerp who can never criticize his own side or compliment the other side. bleating of the sheep XXXX, that’s 90% of what you do. what did i stay exactly, that was wrong?

from a guy who literally couldn’t bring himself
to showup here for weeks after the election

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

See - more insults from the right - and yet you claim the left is having a temper tantrum or is angry. You don't see those type of insults from the people on the left here.

Tell the super. that and come back and let us know what he says.

No ,when you call Seadogg ( who seldom posts)an idiot for expressing his opinion,it is not meant as an insult. You are the typical snowflake who just decided the rules only apply to one side. Or was that just another of your bad boy days?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

No ,when you call Seadogg ( who seldom posts)an idiot for expressing his opinion,it is not meant as an insult. You are the typical snowflake who just decided the rules only apply to one side. Or was that just another of your bad boy days?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It certainly was meant as an insult - I returned the venom he posted. I knew he would throw an insult and run away - and that is exactly what happened.

It is like with you, I don't take your rude, vile comments. What kind of person calls people on-line a POS, makes comments about people's wives and kids?

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by wdmso

it's all a grand conspiracy against white people.is that it? . nothing in a conservatives world can mean more than one thing..?

So the ok sign can't be used by white supremacists and still be used as intended as ok or (I am all right )


https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ght-wing-troll


Dismissing the spread of the hand signal as a hoax overlooks two hard realities: first, that its increasing use gives open license to actual racist ideologues to operate and recruit under the cover of the “plausible deniability” established by less ideological young trolls; and second, that any kind of wink-and-nudge interaction with the racist right is a direct route to its normalization.

1) Presumption of innocence.
2) The significant majority of people are not racists.
3) Why are you assisting a bunch of asshats in co-opting normal speech and symbology. You are doing their work for them. Eff 'em, I am reclaiming my OK sign.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by JohnR

1) Presumption of innocence.They weren't guilty until proven innocent. They were questioned and then the admin. announced the symbols were a part of a game.
2) The significant majority of people are not racists.True - no one claimed the majority of all people are racist or that everyone flashing the symbol is doing it with racist intent (regardless of how Jim keeps talking about his sons playing a game)
3) Why are you assisting a bunch of asshats in co-opting normal speech and symbology. You are doing their work for them. Eff 'em, I am reclaiming my OK sign.

Reclaim it and use it when people ask if you want to go to lunch in 5 min. and you're on the phone so you can't talk.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Reclaim it and use it when people ask if you want to go to lunch in 5 min. and you're on the phone so you can't talk.

"They weren't guilty until proven innocent. They were questioned and then the admin. announced the symbols were a part of a game."

CNN called them disturbing and hurtful.

If not everyone is racist, why do you assume we need to investigate when the kids did this at a football game, when everyone was in a good mood? There was no evidence it was anything resembling racism, except for (1) the OK sign, and (2) the willingness of snowflakes to go bonkers for no reason. That was enough.

If one of the white kids was caught on camera yelling "hey, n***er", right before flashing the sign, OK. But there was nothing to suggest it was anything other than what it turned out to be.

You don't think the left immediately convicts accused racists? Again, tell that to the Duke lacrosse players, god knows how many white cops convicted in the media, or that Sandman kid who be a zillionaire soon. How many examples would I have to cite, exactly, before you might say "you know what, maybe there IS a pattern here." How many? Because whatever the number is, I can cite that many. Al Sharpton made a career out of false racism accusations, and you can't run for POTUS as a democrat without getting on your knees and kissing his ring.

You can't say out loud that your side uses the race card repugnantly. Because liberals are never wrong.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"They weren't guilty until proven innocent. They were questioned and then the admin. announced the symbols were a part of a game."

CNN called them disturbing and hurtful.

If not everyone is racist, why do you assume we need to investigate when the kids did this at a football game, when everyone was in a good mood? There was no evidence it was anything resembling racism, except for (1) the OK sign, and (2) the willingness of snowflakes to go bonkers for no reason. That was enough.

If one of the white kids was caught on camera yelling "hey, n***er", right before flashing the sign, OK, There was nothing to suggest it was anything other than what it turned out to be.

You don't think the left immediately convicts accused racists? Again, tell that to the Duke lacrosse players, god knows how many white cops, or that Sandman kid who be a zillionaire soon. How many examples would I have to cite, before you might say "you know what, maybe there IS a pattern here."

You can't say that. Because liberals are never wrong.

So why did the CG punish one of their cadets for doing the same thing?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

Will just leave this here...

I call it like I see it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device