Trump newest attack on environment

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I read it. it was a moderate piece i guess, but skeptical of
anyone who is still
linking climate change with the australian fires, which as far as i know were caused by arson, not climate change.

Why aren’t we building nuclear plants as rapidly as we can? what’s a better solution that has any feasibility to it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

1. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/01/se...ias-bushfires/

2. I am not anti nuke but we need significant improvements in how they transport and store nuclear fuel over geologic time....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

1. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/01/se...ias-bushfires/

2. I am not anti nuke but we need significant improvements in how they transport and store nuclear fuel over geologic time....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

your article tries to link climate change to the fires by saying that hot, dry weather enables
fires to spread. that’s true. but it’s australia, and it’s summer there, right? hasn’t it always been hot and dry there in the summer? i
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

2. I am not anti nuke but we need significant improvements in how they transport and store nuclear fuel over geologic time....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

True. Just like we need controls
on long term storage of dead
lithium batteries and solar panels. lots of toxicity there, obviously not on the same page as
nuclear, but we’ll need a lot
if space for refuse batteries and panels. i understand they are tough to recycle, don’t know why.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device