Political ThreadsThis section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
"Almost every criminal lawyer would agree" that there must be proof or actual evidence of criminal effort, not mere speculation, before it can be surmised that any crime was committed.
The facts are that the money was given on time and the receiver claimed there was no coercion or bribery.
I guess you took me literally and kept spinning, haha.
I guess you took me literally and kept spinning, haha.
Facts are literal statements. They are not spin. I stated fact. Apparently, since you weren't speaking literally, you weren't stating facts. You were spinning.
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Facts are literal statements. They are not spin. I stated fact. Apparently, since you weren't speaking literally, you weren't stating facts. You were spinning.
No sir you don't state a fact when you say there is no evidence of a crime, I guess you haven't really been paying attention as you mind is already made up......party first.
No sir you don't state a fact when you say there is no evidence of a crime, I guess you haven't really been paying attention as you mind is already made up......party first.
What evidence is there that he bribed Ukraine? Is your evidence something along the lines of (taking off on your previous bank robber analogy) he wanted to rob a bank but didn't, so he is guilty of robbery?
Hybrid Mode
