Biden brilliantly eloquent on the virus

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT;1190470

You're the one who automatically equates criticism of Biden, with defense of Trump. [COLOR="Red"

When [/COLOR]In your TDS-ravaged mind, fairly criticizing Biden is the same as defending Trump. Those two things are distinct, but you can't see it. Everything has to be about Trump.

You've seen me bash Trump again and again, so you're just lying now because you have no other cards to play. You've come a long way Paul, from when you used to challenge me in an interesting way.

You criticize Biden over some petty things that Trump does day in and day out (and worse). I don't think you need to criticize Trump daily but sure seems hypocritical to me.

You bash trump for how he says things - not his policies.

I don't need any other cards to play bc you support a vile, lying, person who cheats on his wife. There were 10 other Rep. who would have gotten you the same judges.

Trump is our Pres. but you try to defend him by equating what he said about Corona to what Pelosi or de Blasio said as if they are the Pres, their words had the same impact or they got the same briefing. The latest is that Trump was notified about corona as far back as Nov. Imagine how much better things would be now if he acted and started the ball rolling.

Maybe we should go back to the days the discussions here were about the important stuff like Obama's tan suit or how he insulted the military by saluting w/a coffee cup.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You criticize Biden over some petty things that Trump does day in and day out (and worse). I don't think you need to criticize Trump daily but sure seems hypocritical to me.

You bash trump for how he says things - not his policies.

I don't need any other cards to play bc you support a vile, lying, person who cheats on his wife. There were 10 other Rep. who would have gotten you the same judges.

Trump is our Pres. but you try to defend him by equating what he said about Corona to what Pelosi or de Blasio said as if they are the Pres, their words had the same impact or they got the same briefing. The latest is that Trump was notified about corona as far back as Nov. Imagine how much better things would be now if he acted and started the ball rolling.

Maybe we should go back to the days the discussions here were about the important stuff like Obama's tan suit or how he insulted the military by saluting w/a coffee cup.

Dont forget the Marine holding an umbrella
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You criticize Biden over some petty things that Trump does day in and day out (and worse). I don't think you need to criticize Trump daily but sure seems hypocritical to me.

You bash trump for how he says things - not his policies.

I don't need any other cards to play bc you support a vile, lying, person who cheats on his wife. There were 10 other Rep. who would have gotten you the same judges.

Trump is our Pres. but you try to defend him by equating what he said about Corona to what Pelosi or de Blasio said as if they are the Pres, their words had the same impact or they got the same briefing. The latest is that Trump was notified about corona as far back as Nov. Imagine how much better things would be now if he acted and started the ball rolling.

Maybe we should go back to the days the discussions here were about the important stuff like Obama's tan suit or how he insulted the military by saluting w/a coffee cup.

find a post from me criticizing obama for his suit, i’ll give you my 401k. my issues were about real
stuff that matters.

doing a lot of lying lately Paul.

I criticize biden for petty stuff? he plagiarized an englishman’s speech. he torpedoes Borks nomination because of
politics. he accused Clarence Thomas of not being trustworthy around women ( that’s not playing the race card). He said that republicans want to put blacks in chains, you tell me, paul, did biden say that or not? is that what republicans want, you think? or was that a disgusting and divisive thing to say?




Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

find a post from me criticizing obama for his suit, i’ll give you my 401k. my issues were about real
stuff that matters.

doing a lot of lying lately Paul.

I criticize biden for petty stuff? he plagiarized an englishman’s speech. he torpedoes Borks nomination because of
politics. he accused Clarence Thomas of not being trustworthy around women ( that’s not playing the race card). He said that republicans want to put blacks in chains, you tell me, paul, did biden say that or not? is that what republicans want, you think? or was that a disgusting and divisive thing to say?




Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So Biden's verbal screw ups are "issues that really matter" when Trump basically does the same thing but is a vile, lying person? We have a difference of the important stuff these days. So again, you equate what a Dems. says and get your panties in a bunch but when a Repub. says something you are strangely quite. Why is it disgusting and divisive when a Dems. says something but ok for the Pres. of the US to say it is not?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So Biden's verbal screw ups are "issues that really matter" when Trump basically does the same thing but is a vile, lying person? We have a difference of the important stuff these days. So again, you equate what a Dems. says and get your panties in a bunch but when a Repub. says something you are strangely quite. Why is it disgusting and divisive when a Dems. says something but ok for the Pres. of the US to say it is not?

When Obama said there were 57 states, THAT'S a verbal screw up.

A verbal screw up is one thing. Slipping into old age feebleness is another. I see the latter in Biden lately.

It's also convenient that you're focusing on his speech patterns, and ignoring his plagiarizing, the sex abuse claims (I'm old enough to remember when democrats said 'believe all women!'), his lying that republicans want to enslave blacks, and the fact that he's been in DC his whole life and done nothing except get rich, oh and raise kids who are freaks by any standard. Any comment on those facts? And they are facts.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

When Obama said there were 57 states, THAT'S a verbal screw up.And you brought that up here repeatedly has if he doesn't know the # of states/territories.

A verbal screw up is one thing. Slipping into old age feebleness is another. I see the latter in Biden lately.

It's also convenient that you're focusing on his speech patterns, and ignoring his plagiarizing, the sex abuse claims (I'm old enough to remember when democrats said 'believe all women!'), his lying that republicans want to enslave blacks, and the fact that he's been in DC his whole life and done nothing except get rich, oh and raise kids who are freaks by any standard. Any comment on those facts? And they are facts.

And you seem to ignore the Repub. laying down infront of Trump and ignoring the claims about Trump - remember when they said they were the party of morals? Remember that fact.

Look at Bork's rulings - he was one of the most controversial picks for SCOTUS and didn't get all Repub. votes and did get some Dems.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

And you seem to ignore the Repub. laying down infront of Trump and ignoring the claims about Trump - remember when they said they were the party of morals? Remember that fact.

Look at Bork's rulings - he was one of the most controversial picks for SCOTUS and didn't get all Repub. votes and did get some Dems.

"you brought that up here repeatedly has if he doesn't know the # of states/territories"

I poked fun at it, but I also repeatedly said that it was a simple slip-up, the kind that anyone would make if they had cameras in their face all day. When did you become a compulsive liar?

"you seem to ignore the Repub. laying down infront of Trump"

Another lie. There was a whole never-Trump movement within the GOP. Did you expect them to vote for Hilary? They don't support Trumps personal behavior, they support what hes doing for the country. Same thing with Bill Clinton, who I voted for and maintain that while he was a repulsive scumbag, he was a good POTUS.

"remember when they said they were the party of morals? Remember that fact."

They do say that, and I absolutely believe it.

Paul, you're focusing on the behavior of a small number of people, and projecting that to tens of millions. What matters, is the policies that each side endorses. The GOP endorses traditional family values. I'm not saying that every Republican lives up to those values, but we say that those values are the best values. Compare that to liberalism, where the motto is, "if it feels good, do it."

Voting for Trump is not an endorsement of hos personal behavior, it's an endorsement of his policies. You cannot argue with that, nor can you argue with his results, so you make the stupid leap to saying that all Republicans think he's a symbol of virtue.

Talk sense. What happened to you? Did Pete hack your username?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"you brought that up here repeatedly has if he doesn't know the # of states/territories"

I poked fun at it, but I also repeatedly said that it was a simple slip-up, the kind that anyone would make if they had cameras in their face all day. When did you become a compulsive liar? Stop your scummy lying. You brought it up many times and tried claiming that the press was in the bag for Obama and that is why they didn't cover it.

"you seem to ignore the Repub. laying down infront of Trump"

Another lie. There was a whole never-Trump movement within the GOP. Did you expect them to vote for Hilary? They don't support Trumps personal behavior, they support what hes doing for the country. Same thing with Bill Clinton, who I voted for and maintain that while he was a repulsive scumbag, he was a good POTUS. That is another lie on your part. Trump lies constantly and the Repub. approval rating does not change. They could have voted for 10 other candidates and still gotten the same judges. So ignore the bad but as long as conservative judges get appointed that is ok? And I voted for both Bushs but can't see myself voting for another R in a national race. Clinton can't touch Trump in the scummy dept.

"remember when they said they were the party of morals? Remember that fact."

They do say that, and I absolutely believe it.But the actions of the Repub. show otherwise. Approve of a lying, vile person some how makes them the party of morals - that is funny. Constantly try to cut benefits for the most vulnerable people in our society is not moral in my book.

Paul, you're focusing on the behavior of a small number of people, and projecting that to tens of millions. Isn't that what you do constantlyWhat matters, is the policies that each side endorses. The GOP endorses traditional family values. Like Trumps? I'm not saying that every Republican lives up to those values, but we say that those values are the best values. Compare that to liberalism, where the motto is, "if it feels good, do it."
That is an out and out lie
Voting for Trump is not an endorsement of hos personal behavior, it's an endorsement of his policies.It says you don't care what his behavior is You cannot argue with that, nor can you argue with his results, so you make the stupid leap to saying that all Republicans think he's a symbol of virtue. That is a lie (see I can do that to). I never said the Repub. think he is virtuous but they certainly are willing to go against their supposed "morals" easily enough.

Talk sense. What happened to you? Nothing, I find you an angry person - always have and I think I always will.Did Pete hack your username?

Happened to me? You support a vile, lying person and try to justify it. He doesn't lie once or 2x but is compulsive liar and your morals seem to not mind.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Obama's tan suit

everybody drink .....