| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-24-2020, 09:21 AM
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
So what was the proof she lied?
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2020, 09:46 AM
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So what was the proof she lied?
|
Just wrap yourself into a fetal position and keep chanting deep state. No further proof is necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2020, 10:46 AM
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
wayne,,, you might want a do-over on that one too
|
To much truth  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2020, 10:48 AM
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Just wrap yourself into a fetal position and keep chanting
|
this would be great practice for you guys for November |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2020, 08:49 PM
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So what was the proof she lied?
|
again, she said in court that Stone was convicted for covering for the president. no such thing was in the charges. you’d think that maybe the judge presiding over the trial, might have a casual familiarity with the charges of the case she’s presiding over.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2020, 09:15 PM
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
again, she said in court that Stone was convicted for covering for the president. no such thing was in the charges. you’d think that maybe the judge presiding over the trial, might have a casual familiarity with the charges of the case she’s presiding over.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Yea Jim, perhaps you could give her a ring and explain the finer details of the case 
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2020, 09:26 PM
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
He was sentenced for lying to Congress, witness tampering/threatening and obstructing the investigation into election interference by Russia.
He did all that to "cover" up for Donald Trump. I think the Judge is smart enough to recognize that "covering up" is not a crime. Saying he covered up for Donald Trump is not a lie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2020, 10:09 PM
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
He was sentenced for lying to Congress, witness tampering/threatening and obstructing the investigation into election interference by Russia.
He did all that to "cover" up for Donald Trump. I think the Judge is smart enough to recognize that "covering up" is not a crime. Saying he covered up for Donald Trump is not a lie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
she said he was convicted for covering up for trump. that’s a lie. it’s that simple.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2020, 10:10 PM
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yea Jim, perhaps you could give her a ring and explain the finer details of the case
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
i know he didn’t get convicted for covering up for trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 07:28 AM
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
she said he was convicted for covering up for trump. that’s a lie. it’s that simple.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
It is not a lie. If you can't understand the statement, no one can help you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 07:52 AM
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
It is not a lie. If you can't understand the statement, no one can help you.
|
show me then, where in the charges it states he was covering for the president. that’s what she said he was convicted of.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 07:54 AM
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
so you think "covering" for someone is a crime? Or do you think the judge thinks "covering" is a crime and didn't know what the charges were?
Use your critical thinking like you do every day at work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 08:33 AM
|
#43
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
so you think "covering" for someone is a crime? Or do you think the judge thinks "covering" is a crime and didn't know what the charges were?
Use your critical thinking like you do every day at work.
|
no, the judge somehow thinks it’s a crime. SHE said Stone was convicted of covering for the president. Sounds like you are agreeing with me, that he was not convicted of any such thing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 08:38 AM
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Paul, judge Jackson said stone “was prosecuted for covering up for the president.”
The judge said that, not me. So when you attack that statement for being absurd ( which it is), you’re not attacking me as you thought you were. you were attacking the judge.
So now that you know judge Jackson said it, do you still feel it’s a stupid statement? Or is it brilliant, now that a democrat said it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 08:41 AM
|
#45
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
no, the judge somehow thinks it’s a crime. SHE said Stone was convicted of covering for the president. Sounds like you are agreeing with me, that he was not convicted of any such thing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No she said he was prosecuted for covering up for the president, that’s exactly why he was charged with lying, witness tampering and obstruction. You’re making stuff up again Jim, it’s getting old.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 08:42 AM
|
#46
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
no, the judge somehow thinks it’s a crime. SHE said Stone was convicted of covering for the president. Sounds like you are agreeing with me, that he was not convicted of any such thing.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
correct - he was not, but I'm smart enough to understand that she meant Stone was convicted for trying to cover up for the Pres. by lying, tampering/threatening and obstructing the investigation . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 08:48 AM
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Jim...they can't even agree...let them argue amongst themselves  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2020, 09:11 AM
|
#48
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
Jim...they can't even agree...let them argue amongst themselves |
they’re denying what she said was true, but can’t bring themselves to admit she was wrong, because she’s an obama appointee. TDS in all its glory.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-27-2020, 01:46 PM
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,452
|
Six-year-old girl arrested at Florida school walked out in flex cuffs
But,but but roger stone (poor old man)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-27-2020, 03:12 PM
|
#50
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,225
|
The chick had it coming
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-27-2020, 03:38 PM
|
#51
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Six-year-old girl arrested at Florida school walked out in flex cuffs
But,but but roger stone (poor old man)
|
what in god’s name does this have to do with Stone?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 06:11 AM
|
#52
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
what in god’s name does this have to do with Stone?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Seal team six ring a bell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 06:53 AM
|
#53
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Seal team six ring a bell
|
oh my yes, because one unarmed
auxiliary police officer, is the same as the heavily armed tactical team that went and hit Stone. you can’t have a more timid response than a single reserve officer.
Jeez...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 10:37 AM
|
#54
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,454
|
Perhaps you think the FBI should take more chances with their lives?
Here is the view of a guy who has been in that situation.
Was the FBI’s show of force too heavy-handed, as has been alleged? Absolutely not.
Lest you believe Mueller's office or the Justice Department decides how many agents are deployed for an arrest, and what type of hardware they’re armed with, you’re mistaken. The FBI makes that call. Prosecutors draft indictments and litigate in court on behalf of The People. They leave the sweet science of apprehension tactics and techniques to other professionals.
Having been involved in the planning and execution of hundreds of early morning arrests like this one, nothing appeared to be “irregular.” This was a “knock and announce” warrant service, not to be confused with a “no knock” (exigent circumstances) arrest warrant. FBI special agents were prepared to employ mechanical breaching tools to enter Stone's home if the occupant delayed their passage.
Stone was not afforded an opportunity for a self-surrender, negotiated through his attorney, because there were concerns he may have been a flight risk (Stone insists he doesn’t own a passport) or that he may have destroyed evidence had there been warning of the coming indictment. Therefore, the FBI would have been directed to take Stone into custody. The means and methods are then left to the FBI.
Some have speculated it was overkill treatment of an elderly man, eradicating the proverbial gnat with a hammer. But some of the most dangerous encounters I experienced in my 25-year FBI career didn’t necessarily come when apprehending career street criminals or violent gang members. It was often the unassuming, benign in appearance, white-collar fraudster, corrupt politician, or senior church member infected by pedophilia. These lawbreakers and miscreants weren’t adorned with tattoos or menacing glowers. But they had a lot to lose, and in their moment of reckoning, sufficiently panicked, they often acted irrationally — choosing to hurt themselves or attack the (blessedly) armed instruments of the state sent to apprehend them.
To those pearl-clutchers raising alarms about “armed FBI agents,” you must be made aware that FBI agents were granted arrest powers and authority to carry firearms back when Congress passed a series of anti-crime legislation back in the summer of 1934, precipitated by an agent’s murder during the Kansas City Massacre of 1933.
That’s why “armed FBI agent” is such a foolish redundancy. As far as Stone’s inaccurate, hyperbolic characterization of agents armed with “grenades,” it deserves no response.
So spare me the “they didn’t need that many people for one arrest” proselytizing. You don’t know that of which you speak. In the FBI, we tend to defuse situations by removing the fight-or-flight inclination, via our overwhelming presence. To arrest one, we bring 10. For 10, we’ll bring 100. And yet, we still have a wall loaded with photos of our service martyrs. None of them expected to lose their life on that particular day.
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 10:44 AM
|
#55
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Thank you for sharing his words Bitchslappedboy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 10:49 AM
|
#56
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Thank you for sharing his words Bitchslappedboy
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
What a vile person you are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 10:55 AM
|
#57
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,454
|
I just ignore Dingleberry because he's the prime example of the old adage that, The emptier the head, the louder the mouth.
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2020, 11:32 AM
|
#58
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
What a vile person you are.
|
I can’t wait to take you fishing with my other kids.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2020, 09:48 PM
|
#59
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Stone's buddy can't pardon him because that makes the Fifth Amendment moot.
So will he commute his sentence is the question.
|
In Donald Trump's America, Roger Stone is rewarded for lying and Lt. Col. Vindman is punished for telling the truth.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2020, 10:25 PM
|
#60
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Thank You for sharing bsb
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.
|
| |
