Ivanka Literally Got Trumbos Back into Emolluments

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

And to be fair, this isn't likely a violation of the Emoluments Clause, but it is a serious violation of White House ethics rules, maybe the Hatch Act for Ivanka also. It's a brazen defiling of the Oval Office and just really a pathetic slimy stupid thing for the President to be doing. Or as we like to say with Trump, par for the course.

Fighting slime with slime. Pretty slimy calling for boycott of Goya. Par for the leftists course. Trump is pro business. Left is pro only for business which hates Trump.

Left wants to scare all businesses into falling in line with its agenda.

very slimy.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Fighting slime with slime. Pretty slimy calling for boycott of Goya. Par for the leftists course. Trump is pro business. Left is pro only for business which hates Trump.

Left wants to scare all businesses into falling in line with its agenda.

very slimy.

So when Tweety called for the boycott of:
Macy’s
Apple
Harley
Vindman
Glenffiddich
HBO
Any news organization other than Fox
Wait, Fox too
Univision
WSJ
Geico
Scotland
Starbucks
Twitter
Any politician who deigns to go against him
But he was either joking or misunderstood
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Ian]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So when Tweety called for the boycott of:
Macy’s
Apple
Harley
Vindman
Glenffiddich
HBO
Any news organization other than Fox
Wait, Fox too
Univision
WSJ
Geico
Scotland
Starbucks
Twitter
Any politician who deigns to go against him
But he was either joking or misunderstood
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This deserves a mic drop, well done sir
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So when Tweety called for the boycott of:
Macy’s
Apple
Harley
Vindman
Glenffiddich
HBO
Any news organization other than Fox
Wait, Fox too
Univision
WSJ
Geico
Scotland
Starbucks
Twitter
Any politician who deigns to go against him
But he was either joking or misunderstood
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He was just being a hypocrite, fighting back against and acting mean and petty like those who, in effect, boycotted him and his administration. Slime fighting slime. Is this supposed to be shocking?

[RickBomba]

Originally Posted by detbuch

He was just being a hypocrite, fighting back against and acting mean and petty like those who, in effect, boycotted him and his administration. Slime fighting slime. Is this supposed to be shocking?

Swampy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by RickBomba

Swampy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Swamp vs. swamp. Standard political procedure. Unusually hyper this year. But that's not what it is about, for me. Making it about Trump may be a way of winning the election. Which means the left, which is becoming more extremely leftist, will be in power.

It is not about Trump. It is about the ideological framework under which we will be governed. Making enough voters hate Trump is a way of avoiding a debate over the real issue.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Swamp vs. swamp. Standard political procedure. Unusually hyper this year. But that's not what it is about, for me. Making it about Trump may be a way of winning the election. Which means the left, which is becoming more extremely leftist, will be in power.

It is not about Trump. It is about the ideological framework under which we will be governed. Making enough voters hate Trump is a way of avoiding a debate over the real issue.

It is about him and it should be.
He was the one screwing the pooch on the pandemic, attacking protesters to stage photo ops with bibles, ignoring Russian bounties on American soldiers, fanning the fires of racial tension, commuting the sentence of a convicted felon that even his own AG said was righteous and delivering incoherent press conferences in the Rose Garden.

The election is going to be a referendum on Tweety, and you can't get enough lipstick to sell that pig.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It is about him and it should be.
He was the one screwing the pooch on the pandemic (propaganda), attacking protesters to stage photo ops with bibles (Nonsense}, ignoring Russian bounties on American soldiers (unproven attack), fanning the fires of racial tension(So you're saying we have fires of racial tension. Yeah. And they've been fanned for decades. Mostly in order to bring down the foundation of this country--accusing Trump is myopic), commuting the sentence of a convicted felon that even his own AG said was righteous and delivering incoherent press conferences in the Rose Garden. (That's what commuting does. You don't commute a non-convicted felon. And Stone, though a whacko, is not as bad nor dangerous as he is painted to be, and Barr is supposed to be this Trump bootlicker, so why would you go by what he says.)

The election is going to be a referendum on Tweety, and you can't get enough lipstick to sell that pig.

That's what you want. But it is about something far more important and fundamental than Trump or Biden.

[RickBomba]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Swamp vs. swamp. Standard political procedure. Unusually hyper this year. But that's not what it is about, for me. Making it about Trump may be a way of winning the election. Which means the left, which is becoming more extremely leftist, will be in power.

It is not about Trump. It is about the ideological framework under which we will be governed. Making enough voters hate Trump is a way of avoiding a debate over the real issue.

Populism sucks when it swings left.

See Slick Willy the Sax Player. #^&#^&#^&#^& wrote his whole corrupt ticket.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device