Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The government is not the free market
The POTUS is not the government. You said it "Just comes down to people with empathy or the guy who thinks the stock market is the economy." You created a choice between governing with empathy or with a view toward the economy. As if one were better than the other or that the latter was not good without the former.
I pointed out that our economic form, the free market would be hampered if it had to be empathetic.
Tweety is not a capable administrator and that is the role of the president
He capably administered within Article 2.
The President does need to lead the administration of the USA
|
I can't grasp what is meant by your "to lead the administration of the USA". There are a lot of different administrations in the U.S.--local, state, and federal. And the federal is divided into three separate branches. Each of which administers its own business.
There is de facto in place, incrementally and unconstitutionally created over time by Progressives, something called the administrative state. It operates in contradistinction to the Constitution. It actually has legislative, executive, and judicial power, is fiercely anti-separation of powers, and is absolutely dictatorial. From all your posts, I get the distinct impression that it is this administrative state, with a strong very powerful rather unlimited executive, that you would prefer as the entity to administer the USA. Which, to a great extent, without the strong President, it does.
This is a very good article that explains the administrative state. I highly recommend that you read it. I think you'll have a great affinity with its governing ideas.
https://www.heritage.org/political-p...-means-limited
Threaded Mode