Final Days

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

seems like the right constantly starts it.

seems like that’s the argument of 4 year old. i never brought up his mother, TDF never brought up his kids.

Paul, we get it, it’s ok when you guys do it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

seems like that’s the argument of 4 year old. i never brought up his mother, TDF never brought up his kids.

Paul, we get it, it’s ok when you guys do it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So when you constantly insult people here you think you can set the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not for a response?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So when you constantly insult people here you think you can set the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not for a response?

You have to excuse him, he's a poor victim and he's suffered a terrible loss.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So when you constantly insult people here you think you can set the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not for a response?

i claim no moral authority. i agree i could have been more mature, and should have been more mature. i’m just pointing out your obvious, glaring hypocrisy. You’re the one making moral judgments ( depending on politics, not dependent on what people are posting), not me.

i showed you screen shots of pete’s posts about my mother and TDFs kids, remember your response? you don’t care what he does. Which is fine, there’s no law that says you have to care. But it means you have no principled reason to hold
anyone to a higher standard than you hold Pete to.

Nice try. Swing and a miss.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i claim no moral authority. i agree i could have been more mature, and should have been more mature. i’m just pointing out your obvious, glaring hypocrisy. You’re the one making moral judgments ( depending on politics, not dependent on what people are posting), not me.

i showed you screen shots of pete’s posts about my mother and TDFs kids, remember your response? you don’t care what he does. Which is fine, there’s no law that says you have to care. But it means you have no principled reason to hold
anyone to a higher standard than you hold Pete to.

Nice try. Swing and a miss.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You apparently took lessons from Tweetless on truth.
Go ahead and bump the thread with screenshots.
Always use those alternative facts, hallmark of victims
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You apparently took lessons from Tweetless on truth.
Go ahead and bump the thread with screenshots.
Always use those alternative facts, hallmark of victims
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

let’s be crystal clear. you’re saying you didn’t make fun of his kids, and my mother. that’s what you’re saying?

sorry i don’t have the screen shots. but you are a truly weak, pathetic wuss. you can’t even admit what you did?

stating fact, isn’t playing the victim card. you can’t victimize me in any way.

if complaining about others is playing the victim card, what does that say about someone who started hundreds of posts about trump? do you see yourself as a trump victim? or as always, is it only a character flaw when conservatives do it.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i claim no moral authority. i agree i could have been more mature, and should have been more mature. i’m just pointing out your obvious, glaring hypocrisy. You’re the one making moral judgments ( depending on politics, not dependent on what people are posting), not me.

i showed you screen shots of pete’s posts about my mother and TDFs kids, remember your response? you don’t care what he does. Which is fine, there’s no law that says you have to care. But it means you have no principled reason to hold
anyone to a higher standard than you hold Pete to.

Nice try. Swing and a miss.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Try again bc as I've said you can't pick and choose the response you get. When YOU constantly insult people and frame it as "ALL" liberals are this or "ALL" liberals are that, don't be shocked when people respond in a fashion you don't like.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Try again bc as I've said you can't pick and choose the response you get. When YOU constantly insult people and frame it as "ALL" liberals are this or "ALL" liberals are that, don't be shocked when people respond in a fashion you don't like.

Paul, again, you’re criticizing me ( and i’m not saying you don’t have cause), and you’re criticizing SD ( which is also fair), but not a syllable when your side does it. you’re
proving my point, not challenging it, by continuing to criticize me and ignoring the ugliness in your side.

because you don’t care when your side does it. you’ve said exactly that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Paul, again, you’re criticizing me ( and i’m not saying you don’t have cause), and you’re criticizing SD ( which is also fair), but not a syllable when your side does it. you’re
proving my point, not challenging it, by continuing to criticize me and ignoring the ugliness in your side.

because you don’t care when your side does it. you’ve said exactly that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't read posts from "my side" and very rarely do I quote them for that same reason.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't read posts from "my side" and very rarely do I quote them for that same reason.

not asking why you don’t read them. i showed you the posts, you said you didn’t care. but you care when SD or I do it. I’m asking why. It’s a fair question.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device