obvious, obvious justice

[Pete F.]

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that glorifies a disturbed teenager killing two people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that glorifies a disturbed teenager killing two people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There are a lot of empty spaces in your sentence which leave out a more detailed account of what happened. But that's what you do. It's your very transparent way of framing things to suit whatever narrative your trying to peddle. It's a way of lying without appearing to. It's propaganda.

Why would a decent person be drawn to agreeing with your fake, made up narratives?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that glorifies a disturbed teenager killing two people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

better to be drawn to a party which according to you, attracts the leaders of our economy, who according to you, are evil plutocrats who destroyed all the mom and pop stores?

your words, pete. your words. try squirming your way out of that.

and no one here is glorifying the death. we’re celebrating that justice prevailed over liberal political bloodlust. that’s worth celebrating. but there’s no glorifying what happened when two people
are dead.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

and no one here is glorifying the death. we’re celebrating that justice prevailed over liberal political bloodlust. that’s worth celebrating. but there’s no glorifying what happened when two people
are dead.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This is perhaps the most deranged thing ever posted here.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

I'd be willing to wager it was a staffer and he didn't even know what they were talking about.

Well, there was the Biden campaign video, that included footage of Rittenhouse, that wanted Trump to disavow white supremacy

“I’m Joe Biden, and I approve this message”

Is your picture in the dictionary next to the definition of “Wrong”?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

This is perhaps the most deranged thing ever posted here.

i’m right. no one is glorifying what took place. we’re happy the system
stood up to the weight of the mob.

that’s a good thing, miss.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that glorifies a disturbed teenager killing two people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that condones (some even encourage) burning down property ???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Candace Owens says "I want vengeance," adding that the Rittenhouse verdict "doesn't feel like a win"
Kurt Schlicter says:
“Your pain delights me. Kyle Rittenhouse killed two leftist catspaws and bisected the bicep of another and there’s nothing you can do about it.“

This is really stupid. We have trained law enforcement officers to handle rioting. Instead the right wing media wants to endorse vigilantism by 17 years olds armed with AR-15s. What is this, a banana republic?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Candace Owens says "I want vengeance," adding that the Rittenhouse verdict "doesn't feel like a win"
Kurt Schlicter says:
“Your pain delights me. Kyle Rittenhouse killed two leftist catspaws and bisected the bicep of another and there’s nothing you can do about it.“

This is really stupid. We have trained law enforcement officers to handle rioting. Instead the right wing media wants to endorse vigilantism by 17 years olds armed with AR-15s. What is this, a banana republic?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

but elected liberal mayors and governors tell the police not to put down the riots ( more important to be seen back then as sympathetic to BLM), so you force citizens to take care of themselves.

that’s what’s really stupid. mayors, governors, and Trump aowed these riots to continue, and for purely political reasons as a heated election was around the corner. they all share blame.

pete here’s what’s also stupid. the media for some godforsaken reason is obsessed with the fact that rittenhouse crossed state lines, which means absolutely nothing. they also ignored that his first victim was a convicted child rapist who was screaming the n-word at the top of his lungs. but he’s your martyr. you can have him.

and the media obviously left out that he said he was going to kill rittenhouse and tried to grab his gun. if you watched the news, you’d think that guy was peacefully collecting signatures for a petition for justice when Kyle sh*t him in the back of the head for no reason.

the left runs the risk of badly overplaying their hand here. Kyle fit the mold of the liberal villain ( just like Nick Sandman), and they went all in on smearing him, facts be damned. it was a rare case of america getting to see how completely dishonest the media is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Candace Owens says "I want vengeance," adding that the Rittenhouse verdict "doesn't feel like a win"
Kurt Schlicter says:
“Your pain delights me. Kyle Rittenhouse killed two leftist catspaws and bisected the bicep of another and there’s nothing you can do about it.“

They sound like you.

This is really stupid. We have trained law enforcement officers to handle rioting. Instead the right wing media wants to endorse vigilantism by 17 years olds armed with AR-15s. What is this, a banana republic?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

A banana republic does not allow its citizens to own AR-15s. The "trained enforcement officers in a banana republic serve the state and suppress any attempt by the citizens to decide what justice is or to defend themselves in any way that the state does not allow. Banana republics are very efficient at negating vigilantes. Those who chased Rittenhouse are the vigilantes.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

Why would any decent person be drawn to a political party that condones (some even encourage) burning down property ???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That’s actually how you complete your Democrat voter registration, you have to demonstrate you know to make a Molotov cocktail and commit an act of arson

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

I'd be willing to wager it was a staffer and he didn't even know what they were talking about.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

That’s actually how you complete your Democrat voter registration, you have to demonstrate you know to make a Molotov cocktail and commit an act of arson

No one prominent on the left, was encouraging them, Spence? When Chris Cuomo says on prime time tv, "show me where it says protests have to be peaceful", that's not condoning violence?

Every single time any liberal says cops are out to get blacks, you're encouraging people to shoot cops, because that's precisely what cops would deserve if they were doing what your side accuses them of. That cops aren't doing anything remotely like that, is of no concern to liberals.

RACISM!

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well, this is photoshopped by the way. I actually found the tweet in question. It doesn't say Rittenhouse is a white supremacists but also calls out militia groups. Considering Rittenhouse was hanging with militia groups that night and was photographed (flashing a white power sign no less) drinking beer with the proud boys after he was released on bail that's no stretch.

Only issue I see is commenting on an ongoing legal case.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

(flashing a white power sign no less)

thumbs up or middle finger?

how come only the insane leftists are familiar with these white power signs?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Only issue I see is ....

this is typically the issue...