Biden’s big announcement

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you can’t grasp the simplest thing. maybe that’s what comes from a lifetime of avoiding meaningful time in the private sector, i don’t know. i do know, that your inability to be logical, is staggering.

i never mentioned affirmative action. maybe his pick will be phenomenal. but it’s stupid to set racial
and gender limits, before you know if and when you’ll have a vacancy to fill.

WHAT IF the ten most qualified candidates, don’t include any black women? What if that’s the case? I’m not saying it is the case, but it could be.

it’s your side who believes that black women can’t compete on a level playing field, and therefore certain spots have to be reserved for them. it’s your side who believes that black women can’t prevail if there’s fair competition for the job.

There’s a term for that. it’s called “the soft bigotry of low expectations”.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i never mentioned affirmative action.

Playing dumb again?

You didn’t have to

Your intention it’s perfectly clear to anyone who’s read any of your posts..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

i never mentioned affirmative action.

Playing dumb again?

You didn’t have to

Your intention it’s perfectly clear to anyone who’s read any of your posts..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

my intention is clear to anyone with a speck of comprehension. yet you completely miss it again and again.

you want to make these picks based on race and gender. i want to pick the best candidate regardless of race and gender.

you want to exclude
many candidates based in their race and gender. i’d prefer to consider everybody, regardless of race and gender?

who does that make the bigot?

by the way harvard has decided they have enough asians and are raising the admission requirements specifically for them. is that discrimination?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

can't wait to see what brandon #ucks up next

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

my intention is clear to anyone with a speck of comprehension. yet you completely miss it again and again.

you want to make these picks based on race and gender. i want to pick the best candidate regardless of race and gender.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But it seems like you had no problem when both Reagan and Trump said they would nominate a woman while you don't like that Biden said he would nominate a Black woman. Hmm, I can't put my finger on the difference.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

But it seems like you had no problem when both Reagan and Trump said they would nominate a woman while you don't like that Biden said he would nominate a Black woman. Hmm, I can't put my finger on the difference.

Reagan and Trump didn't exclude other minorities...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

But it seems like you had no problem when both Reagan and Trump said they would nominate a woman while you don't like that Biden said he would nominate a Black woman. Hmm, I can't put my finger on the difference.

I've said multiple times, it was stupid for Trump and Reagan to announce ahead of time they'd exclude ANYBODY based on race or gender. Fair enough? Maybe get the facts before you make demonstrably false and stupid assumptions.

I'm not a naked hypocrite Paul, I have principles that you don't agree with, but I apply them to both sides.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I've said multiple times, it was stupid for Trump and Reagan to announce ahead of time they'd exclude ANYBODY based on race or gender. Fair enough? Maybe get the facts before you make demonstrably false and stupid assumptions. Go f yourself you angry dic k

I'm not a naked hypocrite Paul, I have principles that you don't agree with, but I apply them to both sides.No you don't.
Where is your thread crying about Reagan and Trump announcing it is wrong for them to consider only woman?

You don't have prinicples bc you didn't start a thread about Trump's saying the same thing that Biden did. Instead you got your panties in a bunch bc you saw that the faux news is crying about what Biden said.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You don't have prinicples bc you didn't start a thread about Trump's saying the same thing that Biden did. Instead you got your panties in a bunch bc you saw that the faux news is crying about what Biden said.

i said again and again and again, that’s it’s exactly as wrong when either side does it. then you act like i give the gop a free pass. don’t blame me for feeling foolish when i called you out for being as wrong as you could possibly be.

yes i’m the angry one. obviously. n. read your post again and tell
me how I’m angrier than you are?

you’re right i didn’t start a post when Trump did it. i’m so sorry. And the thread i started here, was a j-o-k-e. A harmless joke. and it broke your brain a little. because criticism of the left isnt allowed.

Politically, his is a smart move for Biden and the dems. But don’t tell
me it’s not discrimination.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i said again and again and again, that’s it’s exactly as wrong when either side does it. then you act like i give the gop a free pass. don’t blame me for feeling foolish when i called you out for being as wrong as you could possibly be. Again, where is the thread?

yes i’m the angry one. obviously. n. read your post again and tell
me how I’m angrier than you are? I just fire back at your usual classless comments

you’re right i didn’t start a post when Trump did it. i’m so sorry. And the thread i started here, was a j-o-k-e. A harmless joke. and it broke your brain a little. because criticism of the left isnt allowed.

Politically, his is a smart move for Biden and the dems. But don’t tell
me it’s not discrimination.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It is no more discrimination that what Trump or Reagan did. There are multiple people who are qualified for the SC and blacks (and woman) are/were shut out for too long.