Scarey Please Read

[RIJIMMY]

huh....?

there is a problem with this?

...ideologically based violence’ means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual’s political, religious, or social beliefs...

just because some wacko web guy interprets this in some bizarre extreme way doesnt mean we are abandoning the constitution! ANY planned, executed , or threatened violence is ALREADY illegal!

[spence]

Sniper has a problem because he really doesn't know what party to affiliate himself with.

All the rest of us are for the US Constitution.

-spence

[justplugit]

If the main concern is freedom, limited govt., constitutionalism, and privacy, check out Ron Paul's history on those issues.

[stripersnipr]

Originally Posted by spence

Sniper has a problem because he really doesn't know what party to affiliate himself with.

All the rest of us are for the US Constitution.

-spence

Not even close, per usual.

[fishpoopoo]

if it passes, somebody will challenge it and it will be a scotus 1A case that will get overturned.

WTF ever happened to fidelity to the constitution?