GOOD OL,E USA ><><>><

[Mike P]

Originally Posted by Cool Beans

I dont think its that big a deal... not all that different from a doctor refusing to to abortions, or heart surgery on certain patients he may deem as high risk.

He didn't tell them they could not get married, just that he wouldn't do it. He even suggested the other guy in the Parish that would do it.

It's a personal choice he has made that is based on his moral beliefs.

Its a personal choice to marry who you want, it's his personal choice not to marry people he doesn't think will make it. I bet he wouldn't marry gays either.. or a Baptist to a Satanist... or a shepherd to a bulldog...

Thanks--I had you in the pool for who'd be the first guy on SB to defend this maroon.


I had RI Jimmy to place, and he didn't disappoint either

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by Mike P

Thanks--I had you in the pool for who'd be the first guy on SB to defend this maroon.


I had RI Jimmy to place, and he didn't disappoint either

for a lawyer, your pretty dumb, i did not defend him. I defend his right to choose. Like it or not, you live in a country where the klan, nazis and anyone else can march down the street, I dont defend them, but I defend their right to march. We are not a country that enforces its beliefs, right or wrong on others. I said - fire him take what ever action deemed necessary. Public offical aside - ALL of you judging him are no less guilty than he is - imposing your beliefs/values on others. think about it.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

Public offical aside - ALL of you judging him are no less guilty than he is - imposing your beliefs/values on others. think about it.

While some of my judgments may be controversial, none of my judgments have ever restricted the civil rights of other people.