|  | 
      
        |  |  |  |  
        |  |  
 
    
      |  |  |  |  
    |  | 
	
		
        
         
 
	
		| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |  
	
	
	
	
		|  06-14-2012, 02:11 PM | #1 |  
	| Also known as OAK 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Westlery, RI 
					Posts: 10,420
				 | Because we have building requirements regarding property lines, wetlands and native vegetation (likely b/c he was near a wetland)...?
 right.
 build whatever you want, whereever you want... it's in the constitution! personally, I like that there are regulations that says my neighbor can't knock his house down and build a giant house within 2 inches of his property line, while filling a wetland just because he wants to, chose to ignore or was ignorant of the regulations.
 
 
 Seriously, mark it down, I agree with JimCT.... this is local ordanaces... don't like it? Move, or get a petition to change it. run for government.
 |  
| 
 
Bryan
 Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
 "For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  06-14-2012, 02:40 PM | #2 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2008 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 5,238
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND  Because we have building requirements regarding property lines, wetlands and native vegetation (likely b/c he was near a wetland)...?
 right.
 build whatever you want, whereever you want... it's in the constitution! personally, I like that there are regulations that says my neighbor can't knock his house down and build a giant house within 2 inches of his property line, while filling a wetland just because he wants to, chose to ignore or was ignorant of the regulations.
 
 
 Seriously, mark it down, I agree with JimCT.... this is local ordanaces... don't like it? Move, or get a petition to change it. run for government.
 |  For starters, trying to rate this to Constitutionality is completely invalid, just as FB's attempt at relating the restrictions of minors buying pornos.
 
A couple things... correct me if I'm reading the article wrong, but it appears that the buildings were all there when he bought the property.  Also, he did "$1 million in hazardous waste cleanup", beautified a wasteland, is composting municipal yard waste.
 
Note that Ron High lives in Duxbury, as opposed to Middleboro.  Just because he's been cited for violations doesn't mean the citations were appropriately applied.  The end of the article demonstrates that all of this was probably triggered by a NIMBY mentality and someone with pull made some calls.
 
Don't get me wrong, some regulations are certainly needed for safety and environmental protection.  But this whole situation stinks of "our foot is in the door, now let's see how much we can screw him."  I think this is emphasized by:
 |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  06-14-2012, 02:56 PM | #3 |  
	| lobster = striper bait 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Popes Island Performing Arts Center 
					Posts: 5,871
				 | Tulips are stupid, I'm going to sue him for planting a stupid plant. |  
| 
 
Ski Quicks Hole
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  06-14-2012, 03:00 PM | #4 |  
	| Also known as OAK 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Westlery, RI 
					Posts: 10,420
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by JohnnyD  Note that Ron High lives in Duxbury, as opposed to Middleboro.  Just because he's been cited for violations doesn't mean the citations were appropriately applied.  The end of the article demonstrates that all of this was probably triggered by a NIMBY mentality and someone with pull made some calls.:
 |  I don't know what he built and what he redid, but typically a 50% or more improvement triggers all the new construction codes... if it were me, and I was laying out a Mil, I'd be damn sure I had my ducks in a row... |  
| 
 
Bryan
 Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
 "For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  06-14-2012, 03:46 PM | #5 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2002 
					Posts: 8,718
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND  Because we have building requirements regarding property lines, wetlands and native vegetation (likely b/c he was near a wetland)...?
 right.
 build whatever you want, whereever you want... it's in the constitution! personally, I like that there are regulations that says my neighbor can't knock his house down and build a giant house within 2 inches of his property line, while filling a wetland just because he wants to, chose to ignore or was ignorant of the regulations.
 
 
 Seriously, mark it down, I agree with JimCT.... this is local ordanaces... don't like it? Move, or get a petition to change it. run for government.
 |  Or file for a variance with the board of appeals.It is part of the process. |  
| 
 
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
 |  
	|   |  |  
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM. |  |  |