Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Isn't it much easier for criminals to get "serious firepower" than it is for law abiders?
|
Not if the law abider decides commit a crime
Quote:
|
And does "absurdity of the entire argument" include the reason for the Second Ammendment in that "entire" argument? Or does the "entire" argument only include the "why do they need" the stuff for hunting, sport, and personal protection argument?
|
The point was that restricting access can indeed have a big impact on how those weapons are used, even without banning them.
The needs for sporting purposes are fairly narrow and can be met easily under current law. The needs for defense of liberty are quite broad and aren't likely to be met under current law...or are they?
Perhaps the defenders of freedom are already quite well armed.
-spence
Threaded Mode