Schiff lost his marbles

[Got Stripers]

Trump will pull out every legal string he can if enough senators break ranks and vote for witnesses, the last thing he wants is Bolton testifying. But it was a perfect call and all about corruption and the world is flat don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

[Pete F.]

“I don't know those gentlemen. I don't know them, I don't know about them, I don't know what they do... I don't know, maybe they were clients of Rudy. You'd have to ask Rudy. I just don't know.”

But there are tapes and photos and video

[scottw]

Yawn. I think you guys have really got him this time! For the thousandth time
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

Yawn. I think you guys have really got him this time! For the thousandth time
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This is the smoking gun, this time!

[Got Stripers]

You guys can defend him like the rest of the boot licker senators, but you and they aren’t saying what they fear, that when all the evidence comes to light (it will with or without witnesses), Trumps base and votes in 2020 shrink to a point he likely won’t win another term.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You guys can defend him like the rest of the boot licker senators, but you and they aren’t saying what they fear, that when all the evidence comes to light (it will with or without witnesses), Trumps base and votes in 2020 shrink to a point he likely won’t win another term.

Double or nothing right now.$$$
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

great to see Schumer so excited that the unconfirmed, leaked, anonymous report in the NY Times confirms what he believes

[scottw]

drinking game...let's add boot licker to the list

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You guys can defend him like the rest of the boot licker senators, but you and they aren’t saying what they fear, that when all the evidence comes to light (it will with or without witnesses), Trumps base and votes in 2020 shrink to a point he likely won’t win another term.

Did you add in the votes from all the independents that are disgusted with how the democrats have acted the past 3 years. That Kavanaugh debacle was pretty effed up to those people who didn’t have a side.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You guys can defend him like the rest of the boot licker senators, but you and they aren’t saying what they fear, that when all the evidence comes to light (it will with or without witnesses), Trumps base and votes in 2020 shrink to a point he likely won’t win another term.

and democrats aren’t saying what they fear, that if there's another fair and open election in november, there’s a fair chance he wins re election, given the freaks running against him.

both sides want to win in november, no one denies that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Funny stuff, fair election, is that why Trump bribed a foreign power to help him win in the next one. Good stuff��

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Funny stuff, fair election, is that why Trump bribed a foreign power to help him win in the next one. Good stuff��

how about the corona virus? you’re going to let him off the hook for that?

how does a foreign power rig an election, exactly? how do they have a bigger impact than the media?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Funny stuff, fair election, is that why Trump bribed a foreign power to help him win in the next one. Good stuff��

he didn't

[Got Stripers]

The denials are also funny��

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

The denials are also funny��

They may be funny to you, but they are not denials, they are statement of fact. Ukraine received the money without having to do a quo to get it. Your notion that your imaginary crime was that what didn't actually happen was supposed to influence a future election is pure speculation which makes the entire fiction funny.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by detbuch

They may be funny to you, but they are not denials, they are statement of fact. Ukraine received the money without having to do a quo to get it. Your notion that your imaginary crime was that what didn't actually happen was supposed to influence a future election is pure speculation which makes the entire fiction funny.

Good joke, funny stuff, Ukraine didn’t want to and luckily wasn’t forced to announce the investigation in order to get their aid and meeting, because Trump and his BS bribery plot got outed by the whistle blower. Just because it didn’t work and he was forced to release the aid, doesn’t absolve him of abusing his power and then obstruction of congress.

Go drink some more cool aid, your getting low on facts and an argument that holds water.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Good joke, funny stuff, Ukraine didn’t want to and luckily wasn’t forced to announce the investigation in order to get their aid and meeting, because Trump and his BS bribery plot got outed by the whistle blower. Just because it didn’t work and he was forced to release the aid, doesn’t absolve him of abusing his power and then obstruction of congress.

Go drink some more cool aid, your getting low on facts and an argument that holds water.

Cool aid time!
🍻
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Good joke, funny stuff, Ukraine didn’t want to and luckily wasn’t forced to announce the investigation in order to get their aid and meeting, because Trump and his BS bribery plot got outed by the whistle blower. Just because it didn’t work and he was forced to release the aid, doesn’t absolve him of abusing his power and then obstruction of congress.

Go drink some more cool aid, your getting low on facts and an argument that holds water.

I stated facts. You speculate. Impeachment should be based on fact, not speculation.

[Got Stripers]

The fact is and almost every criminal prosecutor would agree, because the criminal effort was foiled before it was successfully completed, doesn’t mean no crime was committed. Keep spinning, you must be getting dizzy by now

[scottw]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I stated facts. You speculate. Impeachment should be based on fact, not speculation.

Paul pointed out recently that he'd lapped up and digested every bit of evidence and testimony that schiff chose to cherry pick and offer to fit the narrative and then completely ignored what the trump team offered in response and then declared himself fully informed and of great judgment and probably a better person with an open mind for having done so....so...that's kind of where we're at

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Go drink some more cool aid, your getting low on facts and an argument that holds water.

ding...ding...ding....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

The denials are also funny��

is it funny when the left denies there’s any evidence that the Biden’s were engaged in fishy stuff there? Or is it only funny when the right makes denials of that which makes them look bad?

a little consistency would go a long way...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

is it funny when the left denies there’s any evidence that the Biden’s were engaged in fishy stuff there? Or is it only funny when the right makes denials of that which makes them look bad?

a little consistency would go a long way...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What fishy stuff. I've asked a few times and you constantly say well Hunter got a job he wasn't qualified for. What exactly is the "fishy" stuff bc w/o someone explaining to me what it is I think accusing them of fishy stuff is very scummy?

[PaulS]

The only reason Ukr. got the $ was bc people found out about the scam.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The only reason Ukr. got the $ was bc people found out about the scam.

That is pure, unsubstantiated speculation.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by detbuch

That is pure, unsubstantiated speculation.

but it fits the narrative.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

That is pure, unsubstantiated speculation.

Nope, go look at the time line.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Nope, go look at the time line.

The timeline can lead to various speculations . . . including yours. But they are still speculations.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

The timeline can lead to various speculations . . . including yours. But they are still speculations.

No, any reasonable person would recognize that when the Trump admin. saw other people now knew about the holdup and they then unfroze the $ w/in a day or 2 it was bc they got caught. I don't believe they ever gave any explanation for releasing the $.

[Sea Dangles]

If anything,this portrayal of Hunter Biden is flattering compared to what is known about him. But some folks ( libs) choose to ignore the character he has displayed. This guy is pure scum and has done more tarring of the Biden name than the media or right could EVER hope for.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device