A nice chunk of that "rare" voting fraud.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

people have managed just fine for many years acting like responsible adult citizens...but according to democrats they are suddenly too stupid or lazy to do so...we don't need to "help" someone else vote unless they request help...like requesting an absentee ballot, which they can easily do...we don't need to go to their door, drag them out of the house and down to the polls to cast their vote which is basically where the democrats and their little fringe groups are at.......I assume adult Americans who want to vote will do so and are fully capable as has been done for years

no they haven't. it has frequently been a problem since the scummy Repub. have figured out that if everyone votes they won't win.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

people have managed just fine for many years acting like responsible adult citizens...but according to democrats they are suddenly too stupid or lazy to do so...we don't need to "help" someone else vote unless they request help...like requesting an absentee ballot, which they can easily do...we don't need to go to their door, drag them out of the house and down to the polls to cast their vote which is basically where the democrats and their little fringe groups are at.......I assume adult Americans who want to vote will do so and are fully capable as has been done for years

Wow so people having to wait in line up to ten hours are stupid and lazy, you are just intent on spreading the Trump and GOP bullcrap.

[wdmso]

https://apnews.com/article/f5f6a73b2...816bb35e82c18d

Aug 3rd 2018. The now-disbanded voting integrity commission launched by the Trump administration uncovered no evidence to support claims of widespread voter fraud, according to an analysis of administration documents released Friday.

I guess they to suffer TDS. While the avg Trump supporters suffer from the lack of. Facts

[Got Stripers]

North and south are two different party strongholds be interested to learn which has these reported long lines due to shortages of polling places.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

North and south are two different party strongholds be interested to learn which has these reported long lines due to shortages of polling places.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm sure the republicans were keeping everyone from voting everywhere

[scottw]

I joked that next, the democrats will want to pay people to vote(the ones that they don't already pay to do so)...but apparently they've introduced legislation...


Senator Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) tweeted, pivoting to promote his own piece of legislation — which would pay voters $100 to wait in line for at least 90 minutes.

The "People Over Long Lines" Act

I'd like this applied to convenience stores...it is ridiculous that I have to stand in line and wait to hand the clerk $1.10 for the coffee that I got myself while some moron can't decide which scratch ticket he/she wants....and the GOVERNMENT is the source of the scratch tickets...which means the government is keeping me for getting my Constitutionally guaranteed coffee(pursuit of happiness)...

[wdmso]

So if Trump wins can I say he not legitimate POTUS because of all the Fraud he and his supporters insist is going to happen ?

Or will this Fraud only materialize or be considered if Trump losses?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

So if Trump wins can I say he not legitimate POTUS\

you can say whatever you want...it's America

just don't spray paint stuff, smash windows, burn buildings, block roadways, assault others and generally annoy other Americans who don't want to be annoyed by you because that would be wrong....

[Pete F.]

Let me make this connection for you.

The 200+ Federal Judges Donald Trump appointed with Mitch McConnell ARE THE JUDGES voting to suppress votes nationwide, including Texas. All three of those judges were Trump appointees.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Let me make this connection for you.

The 200+ Federal Judges Donald Trump appointed with Mitch McConnell ARE THE JUDGES voting to suppress votes nationwide, including Texas. All three of those judges were Trump appointees.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I doubt that what they decided on was actually labeled or used the phrase "voter suppression." What was important is whether or not whatever was being litigated was constitutional or legal.

[wdmso]

Saw an interview with the Texas lt Governor over the Drop box issue . This was the question to him

You dont see the issue of 1 drop box for a county the size of RI having 1 drop box yet another county with 200 people also get 1 drop box

He said no I see no issue
Then went on to complain about voter fraud with out evidence.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

you can really feel the enthusiasm for the democrat ticket!!!


Kamala Harris was in Asheville, NC on Wednesday for a campaign rally ina hotly contested state, but almost nobody showed up. The cameras, upon zooming out and panning around at the get-out the vote event, showed just six people present.

Joe and Kamala have more secret service members at their campaign events than supporters

love how she says "hi, asheville"...when 99.994% of asheville(pop around 100,000) isn't there

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

you can really feel the enthusiasm for the democrat ticket!!!


Kamala Harris was in Asheville, NC on Wednesday for a campaign rally ina hotly contested state, but almost nobody showed up. The cameras, upon zooming out and panning around at the get-out the vote event, showed just six people present.

Joe and Kamala have more secret service members at their campaign events than supporters

love how she says "hi, asheville"...when 99.994% of asheville(pop around 100,000) isn't there

Maybe the locals got the Proud Boys email saying vote for Trump or else. I guess they aren’t standing by any longer.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Maybe the locals got the Proud Boys email saying vote for Trump or else. I guess they aren’t standing by any longer.

that would be the least likely reason....the most likely reason is that nobody likes her and she's running as part of the worst ticket in American presidential election history ....but don't worry biden/harris is leading by like 27 points nationally


weren't those supposed proud boyz emails actually from iran?...probably using money obama gave them

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

that would be the least likely reason....the most likely reason is that nobody likes her and she's running as part of the worst ticket in American presidential election history ....but don't worry biden/harris is leading by like 27 points nationally


weren't those supposed proud boyz emails actually from iran?...probably using money obama gave them

How do you judge the worst administration, seems to me there is a pattern and your side might be winning in the most corrupt race.

[Pete F.]

So...Ratcliffe’s claim is that, because Americans identify Trump with the Proud Boys, Iranian-spoofed Proud Boys emails threatening Dems were intended to hurt TRUMP in the election?

That’s supposed to be a good argument for Trump—that Americans identify him with neo-fascists??
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So...Ratcliffe’s claim is that, because Americans identify Trump with the Proud Boys, Iranian-spoofed Proud Boys emails threatening Dems were intended to hurt TRUMP in the election?

That’s supposed to be a good argument for Trump—that Americans identify him with neo-fascists??
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

are you drinking this early?

[Pete F.]

A jury — one that was sequestered and kept anonymous — heard secret recordings investigators had made. In them, Teflon Don threatened violence and retaliation and made it clear that those who flouted him would pay a heavy price. He pledged to fight the investigators “tooth and nail to the end,” and his spokesman claimed he was the victim of a class war. “He didn’t go to Harvard. He didn’t go to Yale. This is the way these men talk,” the attorney said. “They are snippets of much larger conversations that were deliberately taken out of context … Those isolated phrases don’t mean what the prosecutors say they mean. They are not evidence of criminality.”

Sound familiar, that guy shared a lawyer with the current occupier of the White House.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Because?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Because?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

heard it's up to 80 million Americans who have already leapt over the high hurdle and navigated the daunting process of casting a vote...

[PaulS]

and in Tx there is 1 drop box in a county of millions over 100s of miles. So if you mail it by 11/3 it has to get there by 11/4 w/a postal service that has been politicized or won't count. Seems like there should be more drop boxes.

Again, you don't know someone's individual situation.

It is hard.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Again, you don't know someone's individual situation.

It is hard.

I assume people are adults and can handle this simple task...


(CNN)The Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's order to limit mail-in ballot drop box locations to one site per county, a decision that largely affects the Houston and Austin areas.

The court ruled that Abbott's order "provides Texas voters more ways to vote in the November 3 election than does the Election Code" and that it doesn't "disenfranchise anyone."

Opponents of Abbott's order had argued it exceeded the governor's authority and also created an unjust burden on voters in larger counties to travel far distances to drop off their ballots. Critics also argued it increased voters' risk of contracting Covid-19.


The court did not agree with the plaintiffs' argument that the governor's order had exceeded his authority, nor that the order "severely" burdened voters and their right to vote.

"The plaintiffs complain that limiting early hand-deliveries of mail-in ballots to one office per county requires more travel time for some voters. But this ignores the other options for casting their ballots that these voters have," the opinion read. It noted that voters can also vote in person for an expanded period of time than usual, drop off their mail-in ballot in a 45-day window before Election Day rather than on November 3 only, and also mail in their ballots.

The court also argued the risk of mailing the ballot is "small," and "voters who are worried about it can mail their ballots in plenty of time before Election Day to eliminate the chance of untimely delivery."

[PaulS]

Just shows the Repub. want to limit voting as much as they can. Why does it have to "severely" burden votes. States should try to do everything in their power to no burden voters at all.

Not surprising a Repub. state court would show no empathy for someone whose situation is different from theirs.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Just shows the Repub. want to limit voting as much as they can.

.

it was just reported that more people have ALREADY voted in texas than voted in total in texas 4 years ago...republicans are doing a terrible job limiting people from voting


but keep repeating your ridiculous narrative....

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

it was just reported that more people have ALREADY voted in texas than voted in total in texas 4 years ago...republicans are doing a terrible job limiting people from voting


but keep repeating your ridiculous narrative....

you're the one with the ridiculous come backs - why do the Repub. do everything they can to limit voting? Why get rid of drop boxes?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

you're the one with the ridiculous come backs - why do the Repub. do everything they can to limit voting? Why get rid of drop boxes?

they don't...again, more people have already voted in texas than did in the last election...they figured it out


it's not hard to vote...


why are you mired in the soft bigotry of low expectations?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

they don't...again, more people have already voted in texas than did in the last election...they figured it out


it's not hard to vote...


why are you mired in the soft bigotry of low expectations?

You keep dodging the question.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Not surprising a Repub. state court would show no empathy for someone whose situation is different from theirs.

this is really stupid...

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

this is really stupid...

Ok, snarky one.

Another one on here who next time sees their Dr. should ask why they grew up with such a crappy personallity

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Ok, snarky one.

Another one on here who next time sees their Dr. should ask why they grew up with such a crappy personallity

see...you know that you are wrong and this is what you do....