dont be dissin the Big O! - Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

RIJIMMY · 06-22-2010, 08:30 AM

someones in trouble!
Apparently only Obama is allowed to shoot his mouth off.

General recalled to Washington after controversial remarks in article - CNN.com

RIROCKHOUND · 06-22-2010, 09:23 AM

Sorry Jim:
Politics aside, I don't think the top brass, especially those overseeing a war should rip the current administration. Scarborough had a decent point this morning, basically that Dems and Rep's have to handle the military differently, and that if this was under Bush he would have been fired already.... who knows, but not a good idea.

You can be a retired general and be a pundit, but as an general.... not good.

RIJIMMY · 06-22-2010, 09:48 AM

yet everyone said Colin Powell should have ripped Bush when he was against the war.
Leaders speak out despite the consequences. Do some research on the Civil War and the generals criticisms of Lincoln. What about Vietnam?

RIROCKHOUND · 06-22-2010, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

yet everyone said Colin Powell should have ripped Bush when he was against the war.
Leaders speak out despite the consequences. Do some research on the Civil War and the generals criticisms of Lincoln. What about Vietnam?

'Should have' is the key word. what he does as a retired general is fine, he can go on meet the press all he wants, but an active general, leading the war in Afganastan in an interview with ROLLING STONE? rips the current administration.

the Civil war and the current information age we live in are just a bit different, no?

Doesn't sit well with me.

RIJIMMY · 06-22-2010, 10:29 AM

just curious - would you want to know after his term that he did not agree with the president? Wouldnt you rather know that now?
I agree RS is not a good venue, but whats the alternative?

RIROCKHOUND · 06-22-2010, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

just curious - would you want to know after his term that he did not agree with the president? Wouldnt you rather know that now?

Yes I would want to know that. In 2 years or so, if he comes out and says I went to the President with my concerns and we had meetings etc.. etc.. and he chose to go a different direction, or that the general disagreed with the president etc.. etc. is fine. Ultimately the buck stops with the president, not the general, for good or bad.

The problem is if I know, and you know, then Al Queda knows. I'm not a pussy liberal, remember? I didn't have a problem with Afganastan War, just the Iraq war. Undermining yout CIC in a public setting, whether you agree or disagree is NOT acceptable in my mind, period. It shows our enemies that the military and the president are not on the same page. not good.

RIJIMMY · 06-22-2010, 10:50 AM

yes - but it also shows the people of this country and in a democratic society, that can be a good thing. If the war is going bad - we may know why and can make our choice in 11/2011

RIJIMMY · 06-22-2010, 11:02 AM

actually seems like a small issue - read the excerpts. Not much is coming directly from mcchrystal. Really not a big deal

Excerpts from Rolling Stone article on Gen. McChrystal – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs

mosholu · 06-22-2010, 11:35 AM

If he wants to criticize the gov't policy he should take it up the chain of command. If he gets no response and thinks it is a critical issue for the nation and our troops he can then go to the press. To engage in petty name calling with his staff in front of a reporter is wrong and calls into question imo his leadership abilities. I do not think the fact that most of the comments came from staff really absolves him. Staff take their cues from those who lead them and I am sure they were playing to a receptive audience.
If you ran a company would you have someone making remarks to a paper regarding the management team above him?
To address the point about prior conflicts I can not think of one general who criticized Lincoln who had the performance on the battlefield to back it up. In Vietnam I can not recall, and I admit my knowledge about this is weak, any generals who criticized publicly the US President or the policies. The one guy I can remember doing so was Col. Hackworth and they drummed him right out of the military.
I am not anti military by nature but like in any company sometimes you rise up the ladder to a place where your faults are exposed.

spence · 06-22-2010, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mosholu

If he wants to criticize the gov't policy he should take it up the chain of command. If he gets no response and thinks it is a critical issue for the nation and our troops he can then go to the press. To engage in petty name calling with his staff in front of a reporter is wrong and calls into question imo his leadership abilities. I do not think the fact that most of the comments came from staff really absolves him. Staff take their cues from those who lead them and I am sure they were playing to a receptive audience.
If you ran a company would you have someone making remarks to a paper regarding the management team above him?

I think this is pretty much nuts on, and don't believe for a second his aides felt what they were saying to a Rolling Stone reporter would be challenged by their boss. No way...

Should he be fired? Absolutely if he doesn't resign immediately.

That being said, he seems like an effective leader and this has to be taken into the equation. Unless Obama feels there's a suitable replacement who can step in they might take it in stride.

Regardless, McChrystal and his people have disrespected the president and their uniform. This won't be easy to get out of...

-spence

Fly Rod · 06-22-2010, 07:56 PM

Apparently this general does not belong in the public eye. You exspect a field officer to give the finger while being interviewed. He must have watched to many Clint Eastwood war movies.

spence · 06-22-2010, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fly Rod

Apparently this general does not belong in the public eye. You exspect a field officer to give the finger while being interviewed. He must have watched to many Clint Eastwood war movies.

You sound like you admire his actions.

It's sounding like he was completely aware of the comments. How are the troops in harms way under his leadership supposed to interpret this?

-spence

buckman · 06-23-2010, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence

I think this is pretty much nuts on, and don't believe for a second his aides felt what they were saying to a Rolling Stone reporter would be challenged by their boss. No way...

Should he be fired? Absolutely if he doesn't resign immediately.

That being said, he seems like an effective leader and this has to be taken into the equation. Unless Obama feels there's a suitable replacement who can step in they might take it in stride.

Regardless, McChrystal and his people have disrespected the president and their uniform. This won't be easy to get out of...

-spence

He will resign. That's bad for our men over there. We will now be on the eve of a major offensive with no leadership. I quess we are getting used to that....no leadership that is.
This shows what happens when you loath the military and then become """Commander and Chief""".

Obama's a disgrace .

UserRemoved1 · 06-22-2010, 04:16 PM

LORD OF THE FLIES

Fly Rod · 06-22-2010, 05:09 PM

As it has been since the Obama administration took over,

"Nobody likes the Truth!!" Maybe when they all meet tomorrow, they should have a

PaulS · 06-23-2010, 06:48 AM

If it's a Dem. senator saying anything about the actions of a Repub. pres., he's anti-American and giving comfort to the enemy. If it is someone saying anything against a Dem. pres., it's his right. The hypocrisy is hilarious.

scottw · 06-23-2010, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulS

If it's a Dem. senator saying anything about the actions of a Repub. pres., he's anti-American and giving comfort to the enemy. If it is someone saying anything against a Dem. pres., it's his right. The hypocrisy is hilarious.

you mean like...Harry Reid stating "the surge has failed and the war is lost" on the floor of the senate while troops are fighting ?...yeah, almost exactly alike...some hypocricy...you didn't read the article did you? the capability of the troops is not in question, it's the competence, or better..incompetence of this president and those that he has determining the strategy which ties the hands of the troops as they are watching their friends die unnecessarily

read George Will's recent column on rules of engagement...oh, I forgot, you don't read...sorry

PaulS · 06-23-2010, 09:17 AM

Actually what I don't read is most of your posts b/c I find you (and a few others) to be poisonous and filled with hate (which I actually think is quite sad). Hopefully, your not.

So the troops are no longer fighting? I guess you can not criticize the troops but can criticize the commander in chief - ok, I understand the difference now.

I thought that was insubordination????

Your right, I didn't read the article and frankly from what I heard, didn't think what he said was that bad. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of people who flip flop depending what party they are talking about.

scottw · 06-23-2010, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulS

Actually what I don't read is most of your posts b/c I find you (and a few others) to be poisonous and filled with hate (which I actually think is quite sad). Hopefully, your not. someone needs to look in the mirror

So the troops are no longer fighting? yes, with one hand tied behind their back... I guess you can not criticize the troops but can criticize the commander in chief exactly, the cic is ultimately responsible for the troops and not the other way around ..get it???- ok, I understand the difference now.:rotf2I I don't think you do: I thought that was insubordination???? when someone is restricting your ability to keep yourself from being killed, someone ought to speak up, it's not the troops fault people like you elected such an incompetent

Your right, I didn't read the article and frankly from what I heard, try reading, it's not that long and then you might actually know what you are talking about...at least a little bit for once... didn't think what he said was that bad. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of people who flip flop depending what party they are talking about.

you failed

PaulS · 06-23-2010, 09:47 AM

I don't think I'm filled with hate but if you think so, I'll take that under advisement.

spence · 06-23-2010, 02:15 PM

It's a moot issue now...he's gone. It is a shame that such an outstanding military career would come to an end in such a disturbing way. Some people think he was looking for an out, but I'm not sure I buy that.

-spence