|
Another thing I don't get.
I watched Jane Harman get eviscerated on Fox last Sunday by Brit Hume's assertion that there wasn't *ANY* evidence the attack could have been a response by the video. I'm amazed really that someone with her stature could have been so unprepared for an easy question.
How about the fact that the attack happened after an assault on the neighboring Egyptian embassy?
How about the fact that the following week was rampant with video protests and violence towards US missions in the region?
How about the fact that the NY Times reported interviews with attackers who claimed the video was their inspiration?
Why is it so hard to believe that the attack could have been a product of both terrorism *AND* the video?
-spence
|
Threaded Mode