Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Honestly...I'd like you, off the top of your head, to tell me one thing revealed by Wikileaks that was unethical.
No cheating.
|
First, I'd answer that with a question...if there was nothing unethical in there, why are liberals saying that the release of the emails, tilted the election for Trump?
Anyway, to answer your question, I believe the emails revealed the following...thids is going off memory from a year ago, so give me some leeway, OK?
that the Hilary campaign thought Obama was lying when he outrageously said he found out about Hilary's email server by watching the news, just like everyone else.
Huma Abedin had some criticism of Hilary's political skills, can't recall what it was (I am not cheating at your request).
team Clinton had some choice terms for Bernie Sanders
my favorite, that Catholics adhere to backwards gender relations
that CNN fed debate questions (maybe just 1) to Hilary. That's a very very big deal. Not surprising that the DNC would elect as its leader, someone who would think this is acceptable.
if team Hilary (Podesta and others) had not done these things, there would have been no "scandal". Has anyone claim that the hacked emails were not authentic?
I answered your question. Now please answer mine. If the leaked emails revealed unethical actions that turned many voters off Hilary, why is the only concern, how those emails came to be released? Shouldn't SOME attention be given to what's in those emails? Because only Foxnews cared about the content of the emails. Everyone else was obsessed with figuring out how they came to be released.
Threaded Mode