IG Report

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Yea, blame the women trying to seek asylum because the alternative is gang rape and murder.

Are you responding to the right person? What did I blame the women of?

As for the kids, many are just toddlers. There’s no scenario where taking them from a parent can be considered being well taken care of unless there’s danger to the child.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Is there danger to the child by taking it illegally through hundreds of miles including many areas that are loaded with rapists and murderers and across two borders in order to, hopefully, arrive to an uncertain fate? Do you actually believe that is safer for the child than being in the custody of some legal child service agency or relative other than the parent until the situation can quickly be resolved?

And why do you keep asking Jim stuff such as going to church or what the Good Book says? Do you give a rat's azz about church or the Good Book? That's a pitiful, disgusting technique plied by leftists and the Muslim Brotherhood in order to use someone's beliefs or laws against them when you don't care about those beliefs except to use them as a weapon. And it's really pitiful when you don't even understand those beliefs well enough to do that.

wdmso doesn't approve of bringing the Bible into the argument. Maybe he should chastise you as he did the "right" for doing so. Naah. It's only bad for him, I guess, if the "right" does it.

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Is there danger to the child by taking it illegally through hundreds of miles including many areas that are loaded with rapists and murderers and across two borders in order to, hopefully, arrive to an uncertain fate?

Clearly many feel the journey is worth the risk. If the status quo is unsustainable you have to change.

And why do you keep asking Jim stuff such as going to church or what the Good Book says? Do you give a rat's azz about church or the Good Book? That's a pitiful, disgusting technique plied by leftists and the Muslim Brotherhood in order to use someone's beliefs or laws against them when you don't care about those beliefs except to use them as a weapon.

Just curious if he really practices what he's preached. I'd note even Jeff Session's own church rejected his biblical justification.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Clearly many feel the journey is worth the risk.

Clearly, all criminals feel crime is worth the risk. And, clearly, criminals do not think they should be punished.

If the status quo is unsustainable you have to change.

To which status quo are you referring? The national debt? The overextended welfare state? The relative ease of illegal immigration that is clearly worth the risk?

Just curious if he really practices what he's preached. I'd note even Jeff Session's own church rejected his biblical justification.

Why do you care, and how does what Jim practices re his religion impact his opinions about secular law--you know, that separation of church and state thingy?