Laura Ingraham

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

It's a news story that there are 24 white racists out there.

And you think Ocasio is "a moron?"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by zimmy

And you think Ocasio is "a moron?"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This made me laugh it was so spot on.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by zimmy

And you think Ocasio is "a moron?"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

she makes it pretty clear. now she thinks there are 500 million americans, and that 40% of us, 200 million, make less than 20k. many falsehoods. and she has an economics degree from BU. Yeesh
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

This made me laugh it was so spot on.

you struggle to differentiate between what’s moronic, and what you really really don’t want to believe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

she makes it pretty clear. now she thinks there are 500 million americans, and that 40% of us, 200 million, make less than 20k. many falsehoods. and she has an economics degree from BU. Yeesh
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well at least you got my point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by zimmy

Well at least you got my point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i got your point. it’s very easy to lob baseless insults. a lot harder to tell me i’m wrong when i say that she’s a moron. make fun of me for saying it all day long, but maybe eventually you can tell me why i’m wrong.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i got your point. it’s very easy to lob baseless insults. a lot harder to tell me i’m wrong when i say that she’s a moron. make fun of me for saying it all day long, but maybe eventually you can tell me why i’m wrong.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

A moron is a stupid person. I don't think she's stupid, she graduated with honors from a good university. She's just an inexperienced politician who likely doesn't get the hate machine trying to oppose her.

For 28 she's doing pretty well.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

A moron is a stupid person. I don't think she's stupid, she graduated with honors from a good university. She's just an inexperienced politician who likely doesn't get the hate machine trying to oppose her.

For 28 she's doing pretty well.

she thinks socialism will work despite its track record, she thinks low unemployment is bad because it means we all work too hard, and she thinks college should be free. she is breathtakingly stupid.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

she thinks socialism will work despite its track record, she thinks low unemployment is bad because it means we all work too hard, and she thinks college should be free. she is breathtakingly stupid.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't think even Democratic Socialists want Russian style Socialism. The low unemployment remark is really about low wage growth which is real. As for college being free, we do need to innovate here.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I don't think even Democratic Socialists want Russian style Socialism. The low unemployment remark is really about low wage growth which is real. As for college being free, we do need to innovate here.

i don’t think she wants russian socialism either. but what she wants, can’t work with 300 million people, and even less likely if we had 500 million as she thinks we do.

spare me your apologist bullsh*t, just for once, about what the remark was about. she so dumb, she thinks low unemployment can only be achieved by “everybody working two jobs”, and therefore its bad. and i’m supposed to be impressed that she has an economics degree from BU?

funny, but you aren’t telling anyone that they misinterpreted laura ingrahams comments, her comments are to be taken literally. but when this village idiot puts her foot in her mouth, we should ignore it and focus on what she really meant, which of course is brilliant.

liberal=good, conservative=bad, no exceptions, ever.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

she thinks socialism will work despite its track record, she thinks low unemployment is bad because it means we all work too hard, and she thinks college should be free. she is breathtakingly stupid.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Look at what you said here. You need to stop throwing stones. If you think she means low unemployment is bad because it means we all work to hard... then I am not lobbing baseless insults. You just misinterpret what she meant. Maybe if you stopped referring to someone who by all measures (other than a few misstatements as a person in her twenties) appears at least as smart and successful as you, then you open yourself up to it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

I think she was trying to say people are working, sure, but making ends meet is increasingly harder. This isn't the ranting of a moron. The data on wage growth, inflation and income inequality is pretty clear.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by zimmy

Look at what you said here. You need to stop throwing stones. If you think she means low unemployment is bad because it means we all work to hard... then I am not lobbing baseless insults. You just misinterpret what she meant. Maybe if you stopped referring to someone who by all measures (other than a few misstatements as a person in her twenties) appears at least as smart and successful as you, then you open yourself up to it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

she said low unemployment is achieved by people working more than one job. that’s not how it’s calculated. if i take a part time job in addition to my full time job, does the unemployment rate decrease? no, because my employment status hasn’t changed. i was emoyednwhen i had one job, also employed after i take a second job. she thinks that if one person takes all the jobs in the economy, that unemployment is zero. that’s next generation stupidity. it’s not a misstatement. she thinks low unemployment is bad. her words, not mine. oh, and free college!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think she was trying to say people are working, sure, but making ends meet is increasingly harder. This isn't the ranting of a moron. The data on wage growth, inflation and income inequality is pretty clear.

fine then i think laura ingraham was trying to say that legal immigration is good when the immigrants are willing to assimilate. but you won’t guve her the benefit of that doubt, only liberals get that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

she said low unemployment is achieved by people working more than one job. that’s not how it’s calculated. if i take a part time job in addition to my full time job, does the unemployment rate decrease? no, because my employment status hasn’t changed. i was emoyednwhen i had one job, also employed after i take a second job. she thinks that if one person takes all the jobs in the economy, that unemployment is zero. that’s next generation stupidity. it’s not a misstatement. she thinks low unemployment is bad. her words, not mine. oh, and free college!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That is a bunch of rambling you did there. We have already established that she was wrong about how low unemployment is calculated. You say her words, not yours, yet nothing you wrote were her words in any sense. That is just odd. A key statement, actually her words , was “Because we look at these figures and we say, ‘Oh, unemployment is low, everything is fine, right?’ " Her point was that the low numbers make people think everything is fine. She actually said those words. Your implication is that she thinks high unemployment is better. She never said or implied that. She believes, as Dorito Don did until the day after the election, that the unemployment rate can misconstrue people's experiences in the job market.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by zimmy

That is a bunch of rambling you did there. We have already established that she was wrong about how low unemployment is calculated. You say her words, not yours, yet nothing you wrote were her words in any sense. That is just odd. A key statement, actually her words , was “Because we look at these figures and we say, ‘Oh, unemployment is low, everything is fine, right?’ " Her point was that the low numbers make people think everything is fine. She actually said those words. Your implication is that she thinks high unemployment is better. She never said or implied that. She believes, as Dorito Don did until the day after the election, that the unemployment rate can misconstrue people's experiences in the job market.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

she said unemployment is low because we’re all working two jobs. those are her words, not mine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

zimmy, name one person who said low unemployment means everything is fine? she, like you, doesn’t want to concede the positives about trump, and she’s willing to fabricate jibberish to downplay the benefits of the positive things he’s done. it’s not rational. trump is a scumbag, but he’s helping the economy. why can’t you accept that? bill clinton was also a reptile and boy did he help the economy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

zimmy, name one person who said low unemployment means everything is fine? she, like you, doesn’t want to concede the positives about trump, and she’s willing to fabricate jibberish to downplay the benefits of the positive things he’s done. it’s not rational. trump is a scumbag, but he’s helping the economy. why can’t you accept that? bill clinton was also a reptile and boy did he help the economy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What a weird response. You distort what she says, then basically admit she is right and everybody knows that what she said is true, then go off kilter in some other direction about me accepting trump is helping the economy? WTH dude?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

she said unemployment is low because we’re all working two jobs. those are her words, not mine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, she never said low unemployment is bad. You said those were her words. That is a lie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

For 28 she's doing pretty well.

yeah...she's been an adult for two whole years....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by zimmy

What a weird response. You distort what she says, then basically admit she is right and everybody knows that what she said is true, then go off kilter in some other direction about me accepting trump is helping the economy? WTH dude?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i didn’t distort anything, how can an exact quote be a distortion. are you distorting what laura ingraham said?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i didn’t distort anything, how can an exact quote be a distortion. are you distorting what laura ingraham said?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Are you high?
You keep rehashing that she said unemployment was affected by how many jobs people work. I have repeatedly agreed she was wrong about that. That wasn't what I have been discussing here. You are wrong that she said low unemployment is bad. She didn't. You said that those were her words " low unemployment is bad." You lie about that so you change to a different aspect of what she said. She is clearly light years above both of us on the intelligence scale given the amount of time I waste on this insanity with you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

You finally admit it's a waste of time. Very coherent post for a change.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

You finally admit it's a waste of time. Very coherent post for a change.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Inability to understand on your part does not equal in-coherency on my part, small one

[scottw]

Originally Posted by zimmy

Inability to understand on your part does not equal in-coherency on my part

you've used this one before

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by scottw

you've used this one before

Yes. It is a necessary theme in this bastion of Mensa stars.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device