Let's start

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

WDMSO, Pete has been on a rampage lately against income inequality, but here you are defending the obamas right to become
billionaires.

Can we establish some consistent rules in when it’s ok to be wealthy, and when it’s not? It seems to me, that it’s totally fine for liberals to be wealthy, but sinister when anyone else gets wealthy. Is that what the rule
is?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Seems like these wealthy liberals also give a ton to charity. Ever think they might be using their status to make money to help,people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Seems like these wealthy liberals also give a ton to charity. Ever think they might be using their status to make money to help,people?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

but wealthy conservatives don’t give money to charity? Is that what you’re saying?

my god you are precious...

In all seriousness, Spence are you saying that being uber wealthy is OK, as long as you didn’t cheat or
steal to accumulate it, and as long as you try and do some
good with it? Because i can get on board with that idea. But that’s NOT how today’s liberals view the wealthy. They say wealth is bad because if the concurrent existence of poverty. You sound like
you’re coming dangerously close to disagreeing with contemporary liberalism...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device