A Black perspective that covers it all.

[PaulS]

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Did she sue the entire U.S. or did she have a case against an individual?

Is that ok to clarify before we label the entire country racist?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Did she sue the entire U.S. or did she have a case against an individual?

Is that ok to clarify before we label the entire country racist?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No one has claimed the entire US is racist but for her to say there is no problem when she in fact had a problem seems a little hypocritical to me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Yes, it is a smear by the leftists because their narrative is false. They claim she said that racism is over in America. She did not say that. She said that America is not a racist country. Yes we have racists. That does not make us a racist country. Otherwise, if we accept the standard that having some racists makes a country racist, then I don't know of a country that isn't racist.

And the Owens family initial complaint was that the delay in arresting the teens was because one of them was the son of the mayor. They did not request the help of the NAACP. The NAACP saw another opportunity to show how racist America is and further the victim status of Blacks in this country, and jumped in to sue for racism. It was an NAACP maneuver, using the Owens family to implement it. But a racist country would not have allowed the suit, much less the verdict.

The left also tried destroying her by misrepresenting something she said about Hitler, portraying it as supporting him. And that support supposedly showing the true roots of why she doesn't see nationalism as the evil that the left sees it. Among other things, she has noted that when nationalism is mentioned, there is an immediate attachment of Hitler to it. Actually, she has stated that she despises Hitler. And that he was not a nationalist, but that he was more of a globalist, as shown by his desires to conquer all of Europe and Russia and make alliances with Italy and Japan and Muslim anti-Jews in the Middle East.

If you want to find a truly racist country, look to Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East. Those areas are rich in pervasive and legal racism.

Here is an article that says it better: https://www.redstate.com/diary/daven...-creates-stir/

So yes, the effort by the left is not to accurately depict who she is and what she has said or believes, but to destroy her in whatever way possible because she is a threat to their anti-American narrative.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes, it is a smear by the leftists because their narrative is false. They claim she said that racism is over in America. She did not say that. She said that America is not a racist country. Yes we have racists. That does not make us a racist country. Otherwise, if we accept the standard that having some racists makes a country racist, then I don't know of a country that isn't racist.

And the Owens family initial complaint was that the delay in arresting the teens was because one of them was the son of the mayor. They did not request the help of the NAACP. The NAACP saw another opportunity to show how racist America is and further the victim status of Blacks in this country, and jumped in to sue for racism. It was an NAACP maneuver, using the Owens family to implement it. But a racist country would not have allowed the suit, much less the verdict.

The left also tried destroying her by misrepresenting something she said about Hitler, portraying it as supporting him. And that support supposedly showing the true roots of why she doesn't see nationalism as the evil that the left sees it. Among other things, she has noted that when nationalism is mentioned, there is an immediate attachment of Hitler to it. Actually, she has stated that she despises Hitler. And that he was not a nationalist, but that he was more of a globalist, as shown by his desires to conquer all of Europe and Russia and make alliances with Italy and Japan and Muslim anti-Jews in the Middle East.

If you want to find a truly racist country, look to Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East. Those areas are rich in pervasive and legal racism.

Here is an article that says it better: https://www.redstate.com/diary/daven...-creates-stir/

So yes, the effort by the left is not to accurately depict who she is and what she has said or believes, but to destroy her in whatever way possible because she is a threat to their anti-American narrative.

As usual I didn't read most of your post but when I was typing this I did see you talk about anti-American of the left. If you really believe that you have more anger than I thought you do
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

As usual I didn't read most of your post but when I was typing this I did see you talk about anti-American of the left. If you really believe that you have more anger than I thought you do
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, well I'm sure that it makes you feel better to dwell on how angry I am than it would be to read my post and discover how wrong you are.

Stay ignorant and happy.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes, well I'm sure that it makes you feel better to dwell on how angry I am than it would be to read my post and discover how wrong you are.

Stay ignorant and happy.

I am happy and it is not ignorant to not care what 1 person says (similiar to the thread you just started about someone else). Anyone can find someone on the internet who fits their narrative. But if it makes you feel better that you found a black person who is a Rep, knock yourself out. I could care less if there is 1 white non college educated man who hates the Repub. It means nothing to me and I couldn't be bothered to start a thread about it.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No one has claimed the entire US is racist but for her to say there is no problem when she in fact had a problem seems a little hypocritical to me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I can't find where she said that there is no problem or that racism doesn't exist. I've seen leftist media implying that she said those things.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Candace Owens lives rent-free in $3,500 apartment, claims toxic mold illness, sues landlord,


But if this was AOC OMG what a different tune the usual suspects would be singing