Biden tells Kimmel “country won’t stand” for SCOTUS overturning Roe

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Like I’ve said you’ve been radicalized , that you even dare suggest this is intimidating the SCJ …. What other reason would you take such a leap
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

what did i suggest? i asked, and it was directed at you guys,,what Biden meant exactly?

When a judicial opinion is pending, you’re ok with the president going in tv and saying “america won’t stand for it” if they rule one way?

Is that a responsible thing to say?

And since GS is hiding under his bed, I’ll ask you…what did Schumer mean when he called out Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, and told them they’d reap the whirlwind and not know what hit them?

These are people appointed for life. Do Schumer didn’t mean that they’d lose the next election. So what did he mean?

I don’t think Biden or Schumer want violence. But there are some sick people mouth there listening, so it’s better not to just such obviously violent language. You won’t agree even with that, because no democrat has ever made a mistake
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

what did i suggest? i asked, and it was directed at you guys,,what Biden meant exactly?

When a judicial opinion is pending, you’re ok with the president going in tv and saying “america won’t stand for it” if they rule one way?

Is that a responsible thing to say?

And since GS is hiding under his bed, I’ll ask you…what did Schumer mean when he called out Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, and told them they’d reap the whirlwind and not know what hit them?

These are people appointed for life. Do Schumer didn’t mean that they’d lose the next election. So what did he mean?

I don’t think Biden or Schumer want violence. But there are some sick people mouth there listening, so it’s better not to just such obviously violent language. You won’t agree even with that, because no democrat has ever made a mistake
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

They absolutely want violence.
It’s part of their arsenal and BLM & Antifa are their employees !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

They absolutely want violence.
It’s part of their arsenal and BLM & Antifa are their employees !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

They HATE the right, but they don't want violence, they know they aren't going to win that fight. But their standards of what's acceptable, could not be less consistent.

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

They HATE the right, but they don't want violence, they know they aren't going to win that fight. But their standards of what's acceptable, could not be less consistent.

When was the last time you turned on the news and those on the right were looting businesses & burning them down ?
Like I said, BLM & Antifa are employees of the left
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

When was the last time you turned on the news and those on the right were looting businesses & burning them down ?
Like I said, BLM & Antifa are employees of the left
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

January 6th was a conservative riot. It wasn't much as far as riots go, and for sure 99% of the violence and destruction at politically motivated riots is done by the left. But we do have one under our belts now.

BLM and Antifa are part of the left without question.

I meant democrat politicians don't want violence. They know that fight would be over in two seconds.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

what did i suggest? i asked, and it was directed at you guys,,what Biden meant exactly?

When a judicial opinion is pending, you’re ok with the president going in tv and saying “america won’t stand for it” if they rule one way?

Is that a responsible thing to say?

And since GS is hiding under his bed, I’ll ask you…what did Schumer mean when he called out Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, and told them they’d reap the whirlwind and not know what hit them?

These are people appointed for life. Do Schumer didn’t mean that they’d lose the next election. So what did he mean?

I don’t think Biden or Schumer want violence. But there are some sick people mouth there listening, so it’s better not to just such obviously violent language. You won’t agree even with that, because no democrat has ever made a mistake
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You need a dictionary.. try looking up incitement , sedition , and rebellion . And right wing extremism and their connection to the GOP


then get back to me when BLM with antifa in coordination with Biden Try to steal an election and attack the capital

Until that happens you and the other supporters of seditious behavior keep making you fantastic false equivalences…. Presenting them as desperate attempt at a legitimate comparison .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You need a dictionary.. try looking up incitement , sedition , and rebellion . And right wing extremism and their connection to the GOP


then get back to me when BLM with antifa in coordination with Biden Try to steal an election and attack the capital

Until that happens you and the other supporters of seditious behavior keep making you fantastic false equivalences…. Presenting them as desperate attempt at a legitimate comparison .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

as always, you dodged the question because even you know how flimsy your beliefs are.

when you say “false equivalence” but you don’t tell me what makes the equivalence false, we all know that means, that even you know you got caught in hypocrisy. just saying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[rphud]

I know folks that call it "The War of Northern Aggression", just sayin'