|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
|
04-14-2008, 07:31 AM
|
#1
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish
I wish OTW would make that rule against comm's and enforce it!
|
Unfortunately the fact that S-B won the tournament last year, will actually hurt the chances of that rule being made....at least any time soon.
If a team of comms won the tourney 3-4 years in a row you may see them finally make this rule, but now they have the argument that a team of Non-Comm Surf Guys won the tourney as a basis for their case. In order for them to make this rule they will need to look at the tourney after a few years and see that the winning teams/individuals are really skewed to the Comm Side.
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 08:16 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
I'm guessing the "islanders" who won both the truck and the boat were pinhookers that entered fish into the contest..........
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#3
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish
Wish I could cull through my 95 fish a week haul and weigh the biggest for a tourney! I wish OTW would make that rule against comm's and enforce it!
|
Don't you think that having a 40 pounder shore count as a 52 pounder boat kind of leveled the playing field last year? I could be wrong, but I think the NJ surf guys finished in second--in any event, no worse than third.
We didn't weigh in a single 50, but our ten fish total was over 500 points. The "shore handicap" is something I wouldn't trade even up for a ban on commercials. Our 40s are still going to be worth 48 points this year even with the lesser handicap.
And the Bass n Brew guys enter fish both before and after the commercial season. Their top gun won the September monthly the first year, I'm pretty sure.
Did they bitch about our 33% bonus? Maybe privately they did, but they went out there and fished their nuts off anyway without a peep on these forums, and they were gracious to us at the awards.
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 11:35 AM
|
#4
|
President - S-B Chapter - Kelly Clarkson Fan Club
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rowley
Posts: 3,781
|
I think you guys hit it right on the head with the commericals in the tourney, the surf handicapp has helped a lot to level the playing field and I agree that there is no way they are going to do anything about it now that a team of surf guys won.
Of course people are going to take issue with a "kill" tournament and I think the reality is that people do in fact kill some fish that they otherwise would not if a tourney wans't on the line. As many have said though, it's nothing compared to the entire quota, etc. Personally, I would prob keep a real trophy fish anyway, tourny or not. that's just my preference.
and if it's a pin you're after, the do have a catch and release category for which they award pins.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 05:46 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Westport
Posts: 841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMEUPSCOTTY
Can someone tell me why a weighed fish would go to waste, as long as it was on ice or something until you weigh it? They don't give them back??
|
Seriously, I want to know. I have never weighed a fish for the cup.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 06:46 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 6,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMEUPSCOTTY
Can someone tell me why a weighed fish would go to waste, as long as it was on ice or something until you weigh it? They don't give them back??
|
some people kill fish just for feeding their egos...then rid of the fish after weighing by throwing it away in the trash....if that answers your question 
|
Live at Leeds
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 06:52 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Westport
Posts: 841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingah
some people kill fish just for feeding their egos...then rid of the fish after weighing by throwing it away in the trash....if that answers your question 
|
i guess it does. it never occurred to me that someone would do that.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 06:07 PM
|
#8
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
To me it is just another thing to worry about at the end of the night.
It isn't really a moral thing, or ethical thing, just ain't my bag. I'm in two small fishing clubs. Both can be weighed and released as long as you have a witness, and the scale is testable w/in the club if there is a dispute.
I don't have to worry about getting a fish weighed for the cup, so it is just less of a hassle. I fish to fish, the rest is just details...
in the immortal words of The Dude "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. "
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Posts: 99
|
tournaments are important for their own reasons - good competition and they tend to put to rest whos been telling the tall tales all seasons because everythings official. aside from tournament action however, wieghing a fish (unless it is unusually large/ a record breaker) unless you plan to eat it is probably the most foolish thing guys are doing. killing a fish just for the sake of having a "certified" 30 or so is rediculous thats what should be stopped
|
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 07:10 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: guilford CT
Posts: 858
|
I guess your right Back Beach.... I'h just hoping people stip and think before taking a fish simply to have it weighed for the contest..... because killing a good-sized bass just for that reasosn would sure as hell be a waste....
|
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 08:19 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 1,749
|
Comm vs. Rec Arguement holds no water
Ok I'll bite, I don't think you guys are seeing this clearly. We have had this arguement before.
If a rec angler goes fishing say on Tuesday during comm season and checks OTW website and sees that the 5th place fish so far for the month is a 35 pounder than he can cull hundreds of fish before besting 35.
The Comm fisherman for that particular time of season does the same thing except that 29 of those fish that were 34" up to 35 pounders were put in the box.
There is no difference.
|
Jon, 24' Nauset-Green Topsides, Beamie, North River. Channel 68/69. MSBA, NIBA
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 08:43 AM
|
#12
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,204
|
OK I'll Bite too......
Same scenario 35 lb'er listed on the OTW website....I catch a 36 lb'er and of course it goes on the the beach to be entered.....I keep fishing and get a 37 lb'er now of course I'm going to weigh that in instead so it too goes on the beach......
but now I keep fishing and get that 45 lb'er, but I already have 2 fish on the beach so this one has to go back, unless of course I have a comm license, now it too goes on the beach with the other 2....and I can keep fishing and putting'em on the beach behind me.
I think that is the culling advantage they are taliking about, not culling trhrough the C&R fish but being able to cull through the kept ones
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 08:58 AM
|
#13
|
President - S-B Chapter - Kelly Clarkson Fan Club
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rowley
Posts: 3,781
|
Of course the comms have a distinct advantage and it is a little unfair, we'll see how it unfolds this year with the lower surf advantage.
Either way, if I landed a 3 fish from 35-45 pounds in one night, I would probably chit my pants!
|
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 09:34 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 1,749
|
Last bite, for this arguement will go on forever.
TDF, yes you are correct but that scenario I would ventrure to say would not happen too often. However, if it did we all know what would happen. It would be the same if a comm doubled up on the last fish of the day with 45 pounders.....the small one in the box would magically dissapear just like the small one on the beach.
People have to make thier own judgement call.
|
Jon, 24' Nauset-Green Topsides, Beamie, North River. Channel 68/69. MSBA, NIBA
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 11:19 AM
|
#15
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,204
|
I can only speak for myself.....but the small one on the beach wouldn't magically disappear.....the 45 lb'er would get to swim away.
But thats me....
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 11:58 AM
|
#16
|
Red Eye Jedi
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Facing
Posts: 4,374
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
I can only speak for myself.....but the small one on the beach wouldn't magically disappear.....the 45 lb'er would get to swim away.
But thats me....
|

|
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 03:15 PM
|
#17
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,158
|
Let me ask this again--how did Team SB finish in first place last year with something like 519 points, when no one entered a 50 pounder?
Do you really think that having a 40 pounder count for 52 points isn't a bigger advantage than being able to cull through 95 fish? Out of the 95 fish a commercial gets to box every week, how many 52s are going to be there? Chances are his biggest fish out of the mix is low 40s. Did you know that a legit 54 pound shore fish last year would be the equivalent of a boat caught 72, points-wise?
Even this year, our 40s are going to be the equivalent of a boat 48. That's still a big advantage.
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 04:25 PM
|
#18
|
Finally
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike P
Let me ask this again--how did Team SB finish in first place last year with something like 519 points, when no one entered a 50 pounder?
Do you really think that having a 40 pounder count for 52 points isn't a bigger advantage than being able to cull through 95 fish? Out of the 95 fish a commercial gets to box every week, how many 52s are going to be there? Chances are his biggest fish out of the mix is low 40s. Did you know that a legit 54 pound shore fish last year would be the equivalent of a boat caught 72, points-wise?
Even this year, our 40s are going to be the equivalent of a boat 48. That's still a big advantage.
|
Yup...Surf guys are never satisfied////  
|
F-18®
It IsWhat It Is
¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 03:25 PM
|
#19
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,204
|
I think OTW recognized that as a bigger advantage and that was probably the reason it was dropped to 1.2 this year.
I think that right now, since the tournament is relatively new they are a slave to the numbers. They are going to adjust after every season to try and make everybody happy (which we know will never happen). I'm sure in a couple of years when the surf caught are given 1.1 ratio and then the boat guys win by 100 points (probably because they just happened to have a great year, and nothing more) they will be dealing with a whole new set of issues to address with adjusting the ratio.
The only fair way to do it is split'em up Surf guys and Boat Guys...but that is a whole new can of worms
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.
|
| |