Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-06-2011, 07:36 PM   #1
basswipe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
basswipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 5,695
Immigration fact.

If you cross the North Korean border illegally, you get 12 yrs. hard labor. If you cross the Afghanistan border illegally, you get shot. Two Americans just got eight years for crossing the Iranian border. If you cross the U. S. border illegally you get a job, a drivers license, food stamps, a place to live, health care, housing & child benefits, education, & a tax free business for 7 yrs.

FACT.

Another reason were going broke.
basswipe is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:53 PM   #2
Raider Ronnie
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Raider Ronnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 9,698
Send a message via AIM to Raider Ronnie
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	obama check.jpeg
Views:	597
Size:	30.0 KB
ID:	48344  

LETS GO BRANDON
Raider Ronnie is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 08:00 PM   #3
Raider Ronnie
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Raider Ronnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 9,698
Send a message via AIM to Raider Ronnie
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	obama birth certificates.jpeg
Views:	572
Size:	39.9 KB
ID:	48346  

LETS GO BRANDON
Raider Ronnie is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 02:34 PM   #4
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Iran, Afghanistan, and North Korea are who we should model our country after?

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 02:39 PM   #5
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Obama's claim that under his administration, deportation of criminals increased by 70 percent suggests a significant shift in policy, so we decided to check it out.

According to data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, the number of illegal immigrants "removed" rose about 6 percent -- from 369,221 to 392,862 -- between the end of September 2008 (four months before Obama took office) and the end of September 2010. But a much larger percentage of those deported were convicted criminals. In 2008, 31 percent were criminals; but by 2010, the percentage jumped to 50 percent.

The raw number of convicted criminals who were deported went from 114,415 in 2008 to 195,772 in 2010. That's 71 percent. So that squares with Obama's claim.

Data for the first half of the 2011 fiscal year (which began at the end of September) suggests that trend is continuing, with about 52 percent of the deportations involving convicted criminals.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ercent-under-/

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 03:07 PM   #6
buckman
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
Blog Entries: 1
Nice spin Zimmy but not the full truth...

Illegal alien removals, FY2007-FY2011

Number
% change

FY2007
291,060
-

FY2008
369,221
+ 26.8%

FY2009
389,834
+ 5.6%

FY2010
392,862
+ 0.8%

FY2011 (1st 7 months)
222,312
- 0.8%(a)

a. From same period of the prior FY. Data source: ICE. PDF


To put that in words:

In FY2008 – George W. Bush’s last full fiscal year – deportations rose a whopping 26.8% from the prior year.
In FY2009—the last eight months of which were on Obama’s watch, deportations slowed to a 5.6% growth rate.
In FY2010, deportations fell still further—to a growth of only 0.8%.
In the first seven months of FY2011 (October 2010 through April 2011), deportations are running at 0.8% below the same period of last year.
As things stand now, FY2011 is on course to be the first since FY2002 in which deportations will decline.
buckman is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 04:05 PM   #7
basswipe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
basswipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 5,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
Iran, Afghanistan, and North Korea are who we should model our country after?
Of course not.Be realistic.
basswipe is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 05:16 PM   #8
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
removals...?

they come right back in a weeks time

I know.............. i lived there and knew them personally

they used to laugh about how easy it was
and to them it was a great sport outsmarting the Meegra

Seen a whole migrant family walking in the rain in Northboro today
after seeing them out west i definitely know the "look"
Raven is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 05:47 PM   #9
justplugit
Registered Grandpa
iTrader: (0)
 
justplugit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
Iran, Afghanistan, and North Korea are who we should model our country after?
Nope, just go with our current law of legal immigration.

" Choose Life "
justplugit is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 07:10 PM   #10
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
Nice spin Zimmy but not the full truth...
Huh? Your stats do nothing to refute his point...

By the way, I'd much rather have a policy that dramatically increases deportation of criminals rather than focus on a total number that's a dumb statistic. We have illegal aliens serving in the military, would you be happy if they were deported as well?

-spence
spence is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:48 PM   #11
buckman
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Huh? Your stats do nothing to refute his point...

We have illegal aliens serving in the military, would you be happy if they were deported as well?

-spence
Of course we are deporting criminals...THEY ARE ILLEGALS

I'm going to guess that we don't have "illegals" in the military. They have gone through some kind of paperwork and process. And I didn't say anything about being happy.

Last edited by buckman; 09-07-2011 at 08:54 PM..
buckman is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:55 PM   #12
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
Of course we are deporting criminals...THEY ARE ILLEGALS

I'm going to guess that we don't have "illegals" in the military. They have gone through some kind of paperwork and process. And I didn't say anything about being happy.
Wrong on both points.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:28 PM   #13
JohnnyD
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
JohnnyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
To put that in words:

In FY2008 – George W. Bush’s last full fiscal year – deportations rose a whopping 26.8% from the prior year.
In FY2009—the last eight months of which were on Obama’s watch, deportations slowed to a 5.6% growth rate.
In FY2010, deportations fell still further—to a growth of only 0.8%.
In the first seven months of FY2011 (October 2010 through April 2011), deportations are running at 0.8% below the same period of last year.
As things stand now, FY2011 is on course to be the first since FY2002 in which deportations will decline.
To be true to the numbers, deportations under Obama *have* continued to increase.

A decrease in *growth* is not the same thing as a decrease in actual deportations. A little bit of your own spin in there.
JohnnyD is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 05:25 AM   #14
buckman
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD View Post
To be true to the numbers, deportations under Obama *have* continued to increase.

A decrease in *growth* is not the same thing as a decrease in actual deportations. A little bit of your own spin in there.
I agree but it show's things trending the other way. Clearly not what Zimmy was trying to elude to.

There is a citizenship requirement to serve in the armed forces.

On November 25, 2008, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates signed a memorandum authorizing the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force to implement a new non-citizen recruiting pilot program for the United States Armed Forces. Titled “Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest” (MAVNI), this pilot program allowed certain non-citizens who are legally present in the United States to join the military and apply immediately for US citizenship without first obtaining lawful permanent residence. But they then apply for citizenship.
buckman is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 12:09 PM   #15
Fly Rod
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Fly Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by basswipe View Post
If you cross the North Korean border illegally, you get 12 yrs. hard labor. If you cross the Afghanistan border illegally, you get shot. Two Americans just got eight years for crossing the Iranian border. If you cross the U. S. border illegally you get a job, a drivers license, food stamps, a place to live, health care, housing & child benefits, education, & a tax free business for 7 yrs.

FACT.

Another reason were going broke.
You left out tax return. The U S hands out 4 billion in tax returns to illegals.
Fly Rod is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 02:53 PM   #16
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD View Post
To be true to the numbers, deportations under Obama *have* continued to increase.

A decrease in *growth* is not the same thing as a decrease in actual deportations. A little bit of your own spin in there.
actually...we've been told for many years now that a decrease in *growth* is exactly the same thing as a decrease in actual (deportations).... or .... ohhh..... say...government benefits and programs...just using the democrats own standards...a decrease in *growth* of deportations is a CUT in deportations....which isn't really a good thing if the rate of "importations" is rising .....
scottw is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:03 PM   #17
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Alls (sic) I was trying to say is that the cute Obama pics could have had some other presidents with them. The numbers in the article I posted were department of homeland security #'s. I guess to some people that is spin. Not sure what the source ICE pdf. is in buckmans post. Never mind, found it is Immigrations and Customs.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:07 PM   #18
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Ok Buckman, call it spin but I clearly stated that it was criminals in that article.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:10 PM   #19
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
Nice spin To put that in words:

In FY2008 – George W. Bush’s last full fiscal year – deportations rose a whopping 26.8% from the prior year.
In FY2009—the last eight months of which were on Obama’s watch, deportations slowed to a 5.6% growth rate.
In FY2010, deportations fell still further—to a growth of only 0.8%.
In the first seven months of FY2011 (October 2010 through April 2011), deportations are running at 0.8% below the same period of last year.
As things stand now, FY2011 is on course to be the first since FY2002 in which deportations will decline.
So it will be the first time since Jorge Bush's 2nd year in office that deportation rate fell. Great point.

Just to make this clear for everyone, total deportations each year under the Obama adminstration are higher than any time under Bush. The rate at which they are increasing has slowed, but the total number has not. Simply, under Obama administration, higher deportation rate than under Bush.

Last edited by zimmy; 09-08-2011 at 03:15 PM.. Reason: clarify

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 03:12 PM   #20
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
We have illegal aliens serving in the military, would you be happy if they were deported as well?

-spence
Source?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
...Never mind, found it is Immigrations and Customs.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Let me help you with that last part

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 04:16 PM   #21
buckman
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
So it will be the first time since Jorge Bush's 2nd year in office that deportation rate fell. Great point.

Just to make this clear for everyone, total deportations each year under the Obama adminstration are higher than any time under Bush. The rate at which they are increasing has slowed, but the total number has not. Simply, under Obama administration, higher deportation rate than under Bush.
It's all good Zimmy. I guess I get a little defensive when it comes to Bush. Any increase is a plus in my book.
buckman is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 05:00 PM   #22
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
It's all good Zimmy. I guess I get a little defensive when it comes to Bush. Any increase is a plus in my book.
I am with you on the increase. I got edgy about the spin part, since that really wasn't my intent.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 07:36 PM   #23
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Source?
No idea on the number but I'd think it would be naive to think they aren't serving...

Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Army Times

Military Illegals

The real question though, why wouldn't you prioritize an illegal adding value to the country (serving, studying in college, working) behind a criminal?

-spence
spence is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:16 AM   #24
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
No idea on the number but I'd think it would be naive to think they aren't serving...

Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Army Times

Military Illegals

The real question though, why wouldn't you prioritize an illegal adding value to the country (serving, studying in college, working) behind a criminal?

-spence
An article from 2004 Spence? And one that quotes the subject of the other article from 2003?

And even (way back then) in the article it states that "some" of the people that ended as unknown on the citizenship question may have been illegals.

There probably are some illegals still in today but likely a tiny-tiny percentage.

But thank you for your (non) links as I looked up a bit and ran across this story when searching for something in the past year: Former illegal immigrant follows path to military service

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:29 AM   #25
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
The real question though, why wouldn't you prioritize an illegal adding value to the country (serving, studying in college, working) behind a criminal?

-spence
Why would I prioritize someone that violated a law or is here as a result of violating a law?

The real question though is why is OK for some laws to be broken without consequence? Why is it right to pick and chose which ones to ignore?

We can't chose which laws we will not break and which ones we will not look the other way.

If we chose to break a law we have to be prepared for the consequences. When I break the speed limit I must pay a fine when caught. However if I am driving recklessly I may lose my license or go to jail.

If I kill or injure someone - breaking a law - I have a penalty to pay.

When immigrants have come here illegally, they have broken a law.

I don't always like it. But the law is the law.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:32 AM   #26
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
When immigrants have come here illegally, they have broken a law.
I don't always like it. But the law is the law.
1. Close the border. If that means a fence, go for it.
2. What do you do w. the 11 mil? already here? Deport the criminals, but can we really round up and deport 11million?

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:53 AM   #27
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND View Post
1. Close the border. If that means a fence, go for it.
2. What do you do w. the 11 mil? already here? Deport the criminals, but can we really round up and deport 11million?
Don't know Brian. What do we do?

Do we continue to ignore it so that the issue goes from 2 million to 4 to 12 million? Or do we wait until it is 16 million or 24 million?

We can't discuss with intent to resolve it because the politicians don't want to discuss something that might jeopardize their re-elections - in the meantime each side panders to their base by only pushing their position - in order to get re-elected.

Do we make a system that would require the only "amnesty" would be those that are willing to go home and apply through the front door?

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:56 AM   #28
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Don't know Brian. What do we do?

Do we continue to ignore it so that the issue goes from 2 million to 4 to 12 million? Or do we wait until it is 16 million or 24 million?

We can't discuss with intent to resolve it because the politicians don't want to discuss something that might jeopardize their re-elections - in the meantime each side panders to their base by only pushing their position - in order to get re-elected.

Do we make a system that would require the only "amnesty" would be those that are willing to go home and apply through the front door?
I'm thinking in terms of number$. What will it cost to find, deport and then let them reapply. Is it even logistically feasible.

Some way of streamlining applying for those already here needs to be developed, with priority given to those who are contributing (military service, getting an education etc..). If you don't qualify (i.e. convicted of a crime) home you go.

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 11:44 AM   #29
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
I don't know Brian. Though I am pretty sure that the longer we wait to resolve this issue that it will be both hard and more costly.

Much as most every other major topic that gets booted to a later date.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 12:18 PM   #30
buckman
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
Blog Entries: 1
It would be far cheaper to deport them. You can round them up by advertising some free sh$t. Say Obama care!
buckman is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com