I hope this happens soon

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Nebe

I like that John. I think 1@36 to 45 inches for a slot makes sense too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I prefer a slot limit that protects breeders like 1@28-36. More fish would be harvested than 1@36-45, but none of the bigger fish would be harvested. The overall take compared to now would be dramatically lower.

I love catching big drum. They were getting hammered down south in the way bass do now. States put in slots. NC is 1@ 18-27". Netters are allowed a certain amount of slot fish.The population recovered. Florida has a similar system, but I believe there are differences like a two fish limit in some areas. Protecting breeders is key.

[Sea Flat]

Originally Posted by Nebe

I think 1@36
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Lower the commercial quota and do this and I think we will have a sustainable fishery for years to come! Could probably even go to 1 @34. This will give every fish a chance to breed a couple times before having the possibility of being harvested.

[buckman]

I think this could very well be a large part of the problem
http://www.jackgartside.com/myco_info.pdf
Releasing fish may not be the solution
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Ian]

I can't remember the last time I kept 2 bass in a trip... make the fishery rec only with a 1 bass limit. And end this stupid CT bonus bass program that lets you keep over 2 fish if you have a ticket.

[big jay]

Originally Posted by Scratch59

I can't remember the last time I kept 2 bass in a trip... make the fishery rec only with a 1 bass limit. And end this stupid CT bonus bass program that lets you keep over 2 fish if you have a ticket.

And New Jersey's bonus tag while your at it...

Both of those are states that outlawed Commercial Striper fishing and reallocated that quota to the recreational sector by allowing a third fish (disgusting).

2 very good examples of eliminating commercial fishing not doing a GD thing in terms of reducing mortality.

Stripers Forever "forgets to mention" this when they show their little state by state graph.

Btw - as a charter boat, our business depends on a strong bass population. I'm in no way against limits and conservation that makes sense. But these Stripers Forever guys are barking up the wrong tree.

If they actually cared about the fish stocks and not their own personal agenda, they could put their time and significant funds into something that might have a positive effect, rather than this fools errand.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIJIMMY]

I stay away from these threads because I dont have the answer or suggestions on this topic, If I had my way, they would be gamefish. However, the video is terrible. All the speakers have their livelihoods tied to the sucess of stripers which makes it extremely biased. I dont mean to be overly cynical but you can easily reword to say "please limit striped bass kill so I can continue to make money off the fishery". Its just the wrong angle to tell the story.

[Jackbass]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

I stay away from these threads because I dont have the answer or suggestions on this topic, If I had my way, they would be gamefish. However, the video is terrible. All the speakers have their livelihoods tied to the sucess of stripers which makes it extremely biased. I dont mean to be overly cynical but you can easily reword to say "please limit striped bass kill so I can continue to make money off the fishery". Its just the wrong angle to tell the story.

I think money in this argument is the entire problem. Either way the argument always comes down to money. SF study The Southwick study all about money. Maintaining a commercial fishery Money. The fish are secondary to these arguments and that is the sad part.

Fisheries management is about money and not fish. What is the maximum sustainable yield etc.

Slot limits or not we do not need to re invent the wheel we had a formula that worked pretty damn good IMHO 1@36 fish were every where after a few years.

You could ask 100 fisherman commercial or recreational what the solution is and you would get 100 different answers.

The solution is going to have to be recreational and commercial guys working together for the betterment of the fishery through a fair and equilateral reduction. Otherwise someone is going to get hosed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by Jackbass

The solution is going to have to be recreational and commercial guys working together for the betterment of the fishery through a fair and equilateral reduction. Otherwise someone is going to get hosed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Precisely why I say cut to the chase - go back to the more restrictive levels of 2006 and then cut by 33%

[MAKAI]

How many Bass do you really need to keep ? ( I'm in for 6 or so a year )
To me , they don't taste as good as a lot of other fish out there.
Don't the bigger fish have more accumulated toxins in them anyway ?

[l.i.fish.in.vt]

i keep 1 or 2 bass a week depending on size and who is home for dinner.i rarely give it away towards seasons end i will freeze the meat from a few fish.my season keep total is between 20 to 40 fish.normally i keep fish around 30 inchs.

[Nebe]

Are you sure about that?? I always thought that the larger the fish, the more eggs they laid.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

The part you are missing is that you have to kill either one small fish or one large fish, you also have to add in the recruitment from the fish that come from the eggs. You also have to look at the mortality rates. You w0uld have to establish the population denisty in each age/size group and then evaluate the mortality in each scenario, then calculate the reproductive potential. It is an algebriac problem, not arithmetic. By the way, if you want to use your math to get an idea, kill one small fish and do your calculations for three time periods. Then kill the 40" and do the calculations for three years. That will give you some idea. Then multiply by millions and look at the difference. It isn't really valid, but it at least gives you an idea what happens when you kill a fish.

I'll do a quick estimate of the two scenarios using the math the way you did it, but with one fish killed. By year 10the numbers are even less valid as 35-40% of breeding females are harvested each year.

Kill one small:
Year 1
2x28"= 1,403,000
1 x 40 =1,985,454
(big fish +500,000 increasing each year for 5 years)


year 5
2x28= 2,805,000
1x 50 = 3,818,181.82
(1 million per year positive, diminishing over next 5 years)
roughly 6.6 million eggs annually combined

year 10
2x37= 5427675
(I will let the big fish be dead. The eggs it produced for years 2-4 and 6-9 more than make up for the difference.)

Scenario 2: Kill the big fish, protect the little fish
year one
3x 28 = 2,125,000
big fish dead

year 5
3 x 37 = 4,250,000
(would probably be 2 x 37 accounting for mortality, so 2,805,000 is more realistic)

It takes 5 years from the time they are 28" for those 3 fish to get to the point where the total release by three 37" equals the release of one 50lber.

Scenario one results in millions of more eggs annually and a tremendously greater recruitment. In scenario two, without the 40" fish in the mix, millions of fewer eggs annually leads to an exponentially smaller population in the future. Now you can imagine a scenario where either a 40" or 28" is killed, but there are 3 small fish and 2 40" fish. One has to die. Those two 40" fish will produce tens of millions more eggs in the scenario where a 28" is harvested then if a 40" is harvested.

There is no comparison between the ability for big fish to aid in recruitment compared to small fish.

eggs per year combined
years scenario 1 (kill a 28") vs. scenario 2 (kill a 40")
1-4 : ~3.5 million vs. ~2,125,000
5-9 : ~ 6.6 million vs. ~4,250,0000

Over the 10 year period, the kill a 28" group produce roughly 50 million eggs, the kill a 40" ~32 million.
once the breeding potential of recruitment classes are included it is an astronomical difference

[JLH]

Originally Posted by zimmy

The part you are missing is that you have to kill either one small fish or one large fish, you also have to add in the recruitment from the fish that come from the eggs. You also have to look at the mortality rates. You w0uld have to establish the population denisty in each age/size group and then evaluate the mortality in each scenario, then calculate the reproductive potential. It is an algebriac problem, not arithmetic. By the way, if you want to use your math to get an idea, kill one small fish and do your calculations for three time periods. Then kill the 40" and do the calculations for three years. That will give you some idea. Then multiply by millions and look at the difference. It isn't really valid, but it at least gives you an idea what happens when you kill a fish.

I'll do a quick estimate of the two scenarios using the math the way you did it, but with one fish killed. By year 10the numbers are even less valid as 35-40% of breeding females are harvested each year.

Kill one small:
Year 1
2x28"= 1,403,000
1 x 40 =1,985,454
(big fish +500,000 increasing each year for 5 years)


year 5
2x28= 2,805,000
1x 50 = 3,818,181.82
(1 million per year positive, diminishing over next 5 years)
roughly 6.6 million eggs annually combined

year 10
2x37= 5427675
(I will let the big fish be dead. The eggs it produced for years 2-4 and 6-9 more than make up for the difference.)

Scenario 2: Kill the big fish, protect the little fish
year one
3x 28 = 2,125,000
big fish dead

year 5
3 x 37 = 4,250,000
(would probably be 2 x 37 accounting for mortality, so 2,805,000 is more realistic)

It takes 5 years from the time they are 28" for those 3 fish to get to the point where the total release by three 37" equals the release of one 50lber.

Scenario one results in millions of more eggs annually and a tremendously greater recruitment. In scenario two, without the 40" fish in the mix, millions of fewer eggs annually leads to an exponentially smaller population in the future. Now you can imagine a scenario where either a 40" or 28" is killed, but there are 3 small fish and 2 40" fish. One has to die. Those two 40" fish will produce tens of millions more eggs in the scenario where a 28" is harvested then if a 40" is harvested.

There is no comparison between the ability for big fish to aid in recruitment compared to small fish.

eggs per year combined
years scenario 1 (kill a 28") vs. scenario 2 (kill a 40")
1-4 : ~3.5 million vs. ~2,125,000
5-9 : ~ 6.6 million vs. ~4,250,0000

Over the 10 year period, the kill a 28" group produce roughly 50 million eggs, the kill a 40" ~32 million.
once the breeding potential of recruitment classes are included it is an astronomical difference

Why are you changing things around and killing off fish? Your statement was that one dead 40" fish was like killing three 28" fish. The numbers don't support your statement so you start manipulating the inputs?

This was never a discussion about killing one 28" fish or one 40" fish. As I continue to point out your statement was that one dead 40" fish was like killing three 28" fish. Even in year 1 the three smaller fish produce more eggs than the 40" fish.

If you want to include Mortality rates they should be factored in as a percentage. If you assume a flat rate it doesn't really change anything as both groups are impacted equally. In reality i think its fair to say that mortality rates would increase with age (once the fish reached breeding size) so the larger fish would have a higher mortality rate and take a bigger hit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by JLH

Why are you changing things around and killing off fish? Your statement was that one dead 40" fish was like killing three 28" fish. The numbers don't support your statement so you start manipulating the inputs?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I didn't manipulate the inputs because the numbers don't support my statement, but I will say it was a mess. I was trying to make a comparison so people can see the impact of removing the big fish. It wasn't valid, but I was starting with numbers that you provided for three fish, which assumed all 28" fish will be female .

Even comparing females to females, my statement is pretty accurate.

Year 1:
3x 28” (10# each) fish produce roughly 2,125,000 eggs
1x 40” (26#) fish produces roughly 1,985,454 eggs

Three 28" females produce on average 7% more eggs than an average 40". But start harvesting and you won't get all females. And the numbers are estimates so that 7% is probably +/- 3%.



This is it for me... I agree my explanation wasn't great and I probably should have said 5 or 6 28" to one 40". Here it is in the most basic form, but including males and females:

A group of six 28" fish (3 males, 3 females) produces about 2 million eggs. A 40" fish, almost certainly female, produces about 2 million eggs.

An average harvest of six 28" fish will remove almost the same number of eggs (~7% more, to be as exact as possible) as removing one 40" fish.

It is even more dramatic if you compare a 24" to a 44".

[Nebe]

You guys are comparing two different things. Zimmy is using the example that works best for one given year. A 4o lb fish will release more eggs per spawning than 3 28 inch bass.

Rhl's point is that those 3 28" bass could live to be 3 40 lb bass and hield more eggs in their ice time than a single dead bass.

Ont thing that hasn't been mentioned is that every single fish over 30 lbs is a female. Males never grow that large, and 1 male can fertilize the eggs of dozens of females. Killing smaller fish makes sense because you are more opt to kill a male.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Ont thing that hasn't been mentioned is that every single fish over 30 lbs is a female. Males never grow that large, and 1 male can fertilize the eggs of dozens of females. Killing smaller fish makes sense because you are more opt to kill a male.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by zimmy

It wasn't valid, but I was starting with numbers that you provided for three fish, which assumed all 28" fish will be female .


Three 28" females produce on average 7% more eggs than an average 40". But start harvesting and you won't get all females.


A 40" fish, almost certainly female

I really thought I was done with this? Another really important point is that the 28" fish won't live for 15 more years. The current rate of harvest is that almost 1/3 of breeding females removed per year. Without protection, the far majority don't make it to 40". Protecting them at 28" allows a great majority of those fish to get to large breeding size, which is the point of a 18-27" slot. With lots of big breeders pumping out eggs, plenty of smaller fish could be harvested and plenty would be left to grow to max size.

[JLH]

Originally Posted by Nebe

You guys are comparing two different things. Zimmy is using the example that works best for one given year. A 4o lb fish will release more eggs per spawning than 3 28 inch bass.

Rhl's point is that those 3 28" bass could live to be 3 40 lb bass and hield more eggs in their ice time than a single dead bass.

Ont thing that hasn't been mentioned is that every single fish over 30 lbs is a female. Males never grow that large, and 1 male can fertilize the eggs of dozens of females. Killing smaller fish makes sense because you are more opt to kill a male.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Thanks Eben, that pretty much sums it up. What I was trying to demonstrate was that there is a point at which killing greater numbers of small fish (which a slot limit can encourage) has a more detrimental impact on the long term health fishery that killing a smaller number of big fish. The killing of three 28" females vs one 40" female just happened to be a good example that. One for one it's not even a close.

[zimmy]

I appologize for the hijack of the thread. I just strongly believe the data shows that protecting breeders is critical for the future of bass. Obviously, we all have the same interest.

[Nebe]

But once a fish makes it past the upper threshold of the slot limit, it has a get out of jail free card.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JLH]

Originally Posted by Nebe

But once a fish makes it past the upper threshold of the slot limit, it has a get out of jail free card.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

True – on the flip side if you have a one fish limit at 36” all fish have several good spawning years before they can be legally harvested.

I don’t know what the right answer is but I cringe when I think of all the small bass that would likely be killed with an 18-27” slot limit. Every year a few select YOY classes would be getting hammered up and down the coast. These fish are the future of the fishery. How many small fish would be killed each winter in the Housy and Thames river systems alone if people could keep 18” fish? All of these fish are being killed before they have even had a chance to spawn, that just doesn’t sit well with me for some reason.

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by JLH

True – on the flip side if you have a one fish limit at 36” all fish have several good spawning years before they can be legally harvested.

I don’t know what the right answer is but I cringe when I think of all the small bass that would likely be killed with an 18-27” slot limit. Every year a few select YOY classes would be getting hammered up and down the coast.

It used to concern me as well, but if big fish are left alone, recruitment is so good that what is taken is quickly replaced and there is enough abundance for plenty of fish to get beyond the slot. I cringe much more knowing the impact of the tons of big fish on the bank of the canal in may or on boats in jersey in november, and va and nc over the winter.

[JLH]

Originally Posted by zimmy

It used to concern me as well, but if big fish are left alone, recruitment is so good that what is taken is quickly replaced and there is enough abundance for plenty of fish to get beyond the slot. I cringe much more knowing the impact of the tons of big fish on the bank of the canal in may or on boats in jersey in november, and va and nc over the winter.

Large numbers of big fish don't guarantee high recruitment numbers. Environmental factors seem to play at least as big a role as the biomass. We have had very good numbers of big fish for the last 5 or so years and very poor YOY indices, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012 were all well below average, we have one good year class coming up (2011). People are complaining about the lack of small fish but we have plenty of big fish around. Start harvesting the small fish we do have and what do we have left in 10 years? Big fish die of natural causes. How hard do you think the 2011 year class of fish would get hit in a few years with a slot limit? The management plan that people credit with bringing back the population of striped bass protected the one good year class we had at the time and gave them an opportunity to reproduce before they were harvested.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[l.i.fish.in.vt]

JLH,i am glad you brought up the subject of envoirnmental factors. no matter how many fish spawn ,without the right envoirnmental conditions it means nothing.i wonder how many fish contrubuted to the last recovery. i am not sure that reducing the limit to one fish would really decrease the total numbered killed. what if 3 times the number of people decide to keep fish in the future what if i decide to keep one fish aday 7 days a week rather than 2 fish once a week.i think many of the things that people suggest to reduce the number killed are just feel good statements.the only way to decrease the number is by allowing x number to be killed,just as the commercial has a quota.

[zimmy]

Originally Posted by JLH

Large numbers of big fish don't guarantee high recruitment numbers. Environmental factors seem to play at least as big a role as the biomass. We have had very good numbers of big fish for the last 5 or so years and very poor YOY indices, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012 were all well below average, we have one good year class coming up (2011). People are complaining about the lack of small fish but we have plenty of big fish around. Start harvesting the small fish we do have and what do we have left in 10 years? Big fish die of natural causes. How hard do you think the 2011 year class of fish would get hit in a few years with a slot limit? The management plan that people credit with bringing back the population of striped bass protected the one good year class we had at the time and gave them an opportunity to reproduce before they were harvested.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Environmental factors matter, particularly for a given year. The size of the breeding population matters tremendously over an extended period of time. Clearly, there are years with plenty of fish where there are breeders, but terrible yoy, but the good years are better when there are more breeders, so it somewhat balances out. Although, I am curious about what you base your statement about plenty of big fish?

I agree there is potential for some year classes to get hammered, but
more restrictive regulations can be used to protect certain year classes. The slot can also change to target certain size fish. Since harvesting small fish only gets half females, and young fish are easier to replace. A size class can get somewhat more hammered when young with less impact.
One thing about the 80's is that there were few big fish or small fish and even less fisherman. People weren't killing fish over 36" like they are now, so it is a tough to compare today to then. I also don't think the problem is people taking 2 fish every time they go, but rather one fish over and over up and down the coast.

[JFigliuolo]

unless it's one of those mexican pails... err... I mean jails...

[Nebe]

Hahahahaha!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Nebe]

Agreed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Nebe]

I think it should be 1 fish - 28-34 inches
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Nebe]

Imagine if every fish from 35 to 45 lbs was allowed to spawn. It would be amazing. There would be a lot more 50 lb ers caught as well and if there was a trophy slot of fish length that was over 60 inches (off the top of my head) many many more people would be able to catch a fish of a lifetime. That is what goes on down south with the redfish.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[zimmy]

All good points