If the gop win the midterms

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Now your playing dumb.

Classic, you think the IRS is made up of only of agents.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

$46B of the $80B that is in the bill is specifically earmarked for the hiring of agents. The median income for IRS agents is $55,937 a year, which come out to roughly 83,000 agents hired. So the 87,000 agents # being thrown around is pretty close

https://amp.comparably.com/salaries/...-service-agent


https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/irs...reduction-act/

“Under the plan, about $46 billion of that $80 billion would be spent on hiring more enforcement agents”

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

I saw the ad for new agents...."willing to use deadly force" was a prerequisite in Dark Brandon's Enforcement Brigade

Your deep in the cult even if you won’t admit it.

Last time I checked The IRS Criminal Investigation special agent job

Is not a generic IRS agent. But again more conservatives 1/2 truths

But of course you have no issues with cops use if deadly force. Even against the unarmed ..

But but the IRS
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

$46B of the $80B that is in the bill is specifically earmarked for the hiring of agents. The median income for IRS agents is $55,937 a year, which come out to roughly 89,000 agents hired. So the 87,000 agents # being thrown around is pretty accurate

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/irs...reduction-act/

“Under the plan, about $46 billion of that $80 billion would be spent on hiring more enforcement agents”

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you show up again peddling 1/2 truths like your buddy shocking

In your own provided link

The department estimated in a 2021 report that the funding may cover about 87,000 employees, which has been widely reported. However, these hires may include a range of positions, such as auditors, customer service and IT workers, the Treasury clarified in a statement to CNBC on Wednesday.


Let me guess you missed that part
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Your deep in the cult even if you won’t admit it.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

whatever tickles your little brain....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

So you show up again peddling 1/2 truths like your buddy shocking


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you and pete should share a therapist...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Your deep in the cult even if you won’t admit it.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

how would you go about demonstrating that you’re not in a cult? for the 1,000th time, can you list some big policy issues in which you agree with conservatives? or do you ( despite NOT being in a cult) think liberals are correct on every single, solitary issue?

you said republicans want a brutal fascist big federal government to impose sharia law. 5 minutes later you said they want no rules so that it’s every man for himself

but you’re not in a cult.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

how would you go about demonstrating that you’re not in a cult?

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's just how he argues...he has to first tell you that you are a deranged misinformed pos then he recites stuff he read on leftwingloon.com

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Now your playing dumb.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

at least I'm only playing

[The Dad Fisherman]

Why do I f***ing try
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by scottw

at least I'm only playing

I swear he’s got an extra chromosome
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[falkners]

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

such children

Whom think the FBI plant’s evidence is the enemy of the avg America [ code for conservatives) and the IRS are Hiring 89 thousand hit men over 10 years to take out and Harrass who’s ever left! Because the internet told them so !

And of course The 3 amigos can’t or don’t understand using the term cult is a metaphor. Like SNOWFLAKE

Enjoy your T shirts
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

such children

Whom think the FBI plant’s evidence is the enemy of the avg America [ code for conservatives)
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

your high school english teacher just checked himself into rehab.

i mean, i make a LOT of typos, way too many, but that’s some fine lefty gibberish right there.

i don’t think the FBI is the enemy, but i don’t deny that there’s evidence that the left has occasionally used the DOJ as a weapon against political
opponents. Kind of hard to deny that.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

your high school english teacher just checked himself into rehab.

i mean, i make a LOT of typos, way too many, but that’s some fine lefty gibberish right there.

i don’t think the FBI is the enemy, but i don’t deny that there’s evidence that the left has occasionally used the DOJ as a weapon against political
opponents. Kind of hard to deny that.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No Jim it’s not hard to deny your delusional views
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

The Democrats are not increasing the IRS because they think they're going to be audited ... They're increasing the size of the IRS so they can use it as a political weapon against conservatives," Clyde said.

"[The beefed-up IRS] will become more weaponized ... more militaristic," said Clyde, alluding to an alleged IRS job posting in which some applicants might be expected to carry firearms, potentially for citizen raids.


Maybe a friend of Scott and Dad ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

$46B of the $80B that is in the bill is specifically earmarked for the hiring of agents. The median income for IRS agents is $55,937 a year, which come out to roughly 83,000 agents hired. So the 87,000 agents # being thrown around is pretty close

https://amp.comparably.com/salaries/...-service-agent


https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/irs...reduction-act/

“Under the plan, about $46 billion of that $80 billion would be spent on hiring more enforcement agents”

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And well over half of them are planned hires to replace projected retirements.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

And well over half of them are planned hires to replace projected retirements.

Yep, that and those positions already vacant from past attrition. But the point of my post was breaking down the math for the agents as a whole. That and to show that a significant chunk of the money was for the hiring of agents.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

That and to show that a significant chunk of the money was for the hiring of agents.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

look for updated definitions of "raid" and "agents"

[scottw]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

And well over half of them are planned hires to replace projected retirements.

this all you need to know.....


CBS News

The Inflation Reduction Act would invest $370 billion in fighting climate change and $64 billion to lower costs for people with Affordable Care Act health plans. To pay for that, Democrats want the IRS to step up audits and enforcement efforts to collect billions that currently get lost in the so-called tax gap.

[Got Stripers]

I’m confused are you against the government hiring to ensure taxes due are collected on time.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

I’m confused are you against the government hiring to ensure taxes due are collected on time.

Don’t forget AOC owes 1600 bucks in back taxes they support going after her
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Don’t forget AOC owes 1600 bucks in back taxes they support going after her
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no comment on the fact the democrats took out the elimination of a tax loophole for the wealthy, in that bill. so let’s not hear any nonsense about wanting the wealthy to pay their fair share.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

no comment on the fact the democrats took out the elimination of a tax loophole for the wealthy, in that bill. so let’s not hear any nonsense about wanting the wealthy to pay their fair share.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What loophole, honestly curious
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

What loophole, honestly curious
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

something called the “carried interest loophole” which benefits private equity investors ( not a lot of poor people in that group). recent versions of the inflation reduction. bill included the elimination of that loophole to help pay for it. Sinema, who takes campaign donations from very wealthy private equity folks, had that elimination removed, thus preserving the loophole. The democrats passed the version of the bill which preserved that loophole

Have a good weekend TDF.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna42394
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

no comment on the fact the democrats took out the elimination of a tax loophole for the wealthy, in that bill. so let’s not hear any nonsense about wanting the wealthy to pay their fair share.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Clearly you have no concept of negotiation and no one every gets everything they want


Wow There are 3,841 Hedge Funds businesses in the US as of 2022




But again feel free to ignore everything else in the bill



Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

something called the “carried interest loophole” which benefits private equity investors ( not a lot of poor people in that group). recent versions of the inflation reduction. bill included the elimination of that loophole to help pay for it. Sinema, who takes campaign donations from very wealthy private equity folks, had that elimination removed, thus preserving the loophole. The democrats passed the version of the bill which preserved that loophole

Have a good weekend TDF.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna42394
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So are you admitting you don’t realize that sometimes you need to take things out in order to get a holdout vote you need to pass the bill so the majority passes? Of are you just running out of good talking points as this administration continues to pass good legislation that helps average Americans?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

So are you admitting you don’t realize that sometimes you need to take things out in order to get a holdout vote you need to pass the bill so the majority passes? Of are you just running out of good talking points as this administration continues to pass good legislation that helps average Americans?

my god did you miss the point.

if democrats actually believed in making the rich pay their fair share, they wouldn’t have had to take it out. But they didn’t have the votes within their own party unless they took it out, which necessarily means the democrats as a whole don’t really believe what they claim to believe.

make that wrong.

the democrats quickly became the party of the billionaire class. wall
street leans very much to the left now. So can we just admit it.

i’m old
enough to remember when you guys criticized the right for being the party of the rich. but today it’s a good thing to be the party of the rich? why is that?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

According to Rasmussen poll (Trump’s favorite pollster), President Biden's job approval has risen from 36% three weeks ago to 45% today.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

they should keep him in hiding...it's really helping his polling numbers

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

my god did you miss the point.

if democrats actually believed in making the rich pay their fair share, they wouldn’t have had to take it out. But they didn’t have the votes within their own party unless they took it out, which necessarily means the democrats as a whole don’t really believe what they claim to believe.

make that wrong.

the democrats quickly became the party of the billionaire class. wall
street leans very much to the left now. So can we just admit it.

i’m old
enough to remember when you guys criticized the right for being the party of the rich. but today it’s a good thing to be the party of the rich? why is that?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If the Dems like the Trumplicans only passed legislation that was strict party line, they could accomplish as little of value to the American people as the Trumplicans do.

When Republicans have power, they ban abortion, cut billionaires’ taxes and attack LGBT Americans. When Democrats have power, they add jobs, fund veteran care, bring manufacturing home, protect the climate and defend reproductive rights.

Which do you think is better for America?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

they should keep him in hiding...it's really helping his polling numbers

He’s working

With the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in the House, families will see lower prescription drug prices, lower health care costs, and lower energy costs.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device