Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2013, 10:08 AM   #31
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clammer View Post
JL
I was also @ the meeting & a commercial R/R ask the person from the DEm if the they or the state or anyone /anywhere has evidence to back this up .
She said of all the studies & testing that has been done .............. the only harmful chemical that is coming up in fish is mercury ..........zero on lead, iron, etc ?????????????
Mercury is a chronic bioaccumulation, biomagnification issue. The coat hanger, and ingested lead for that matter, are accute threats. I can supply a veterinarian who can testify what a coat hanger does to the digestive tract of vertebrates. Would that help this committee ? The tests have not been done specifically on striped-bass with those quantities of lead digested, because you would have to capture those specific fish from the wild, which is nearly impossible or set up a controlled experiment where they are fed yo-yo rigged bait. There is plenty of scientific data of the effect of lead on vertebrates. Yo-yoing is for people with short rods.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 11:30 AM   #32
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski View Post
Is there scientific data available which shows how long lead must be inside the stomach of a fish, bird or human before enough lead is absorbed into the bloodstream to become lethal?

Absorption rates in humans are known A child in Oregon died of lead poisoning within four days of swallowing a necklace that contained lead. He had syptoms within 24 hours.
In children, up to 50% of ingested lead may be absorbed (see Grant, L.D. (2009). "Lead and compounds". In Lippmann, M.. Environmental Toxicants: Human Exposures and Their Health Effects (3rd ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0-471-79335-3).

LD50 of lead is known for many fish, birds, etc. Given the digestive system in fish, the lead is not going to pass through the digestive tract and will stay in the fish to be continually absorbed. The amount of lead in a fish that eats yoyo'd bait is going to kill most of them. I don't have any idea how many people yoyo or how many baits come free, so I can't guess how much of an issue it is for the overall population. Maybe I kill just as many fish by catch and release mortality as a person who yoyo's for meat, I don't know.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 11:35 AM   #33
tlapinski
All up in the Interweb!
iTrader: (1)
 
tlapinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
Absorption rates in humans are known A child in Oregon died of lead poisoning within four days of swallowing a necklace that contained lead. He had syptoms within 24 hours.
In children, up to 50% of ingested lead may be absorbed (see Grant, L.D. (2009). "Lead and compounds". In Lippmann, M.. Environmental Toxicants: Human Exposures and Their Health Effects (3rd ed.). Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0-471-79335-3).

LD50 of lead is known for many fish, birds, etc. Given the digestive system in fish, the lead is not going to pass through the digestive tract and will stay in the fish to be continually absorbed. The amount of lead in a fish that eats yoyo'd bait is going to kill most of them. I don't have any idea how many people yoyo or how many baits come free, so I can't guess how much of an issue it is for the overall population. Maybe I kill just as many fish by catch and release mortality as a person who yoyo's for meat, I don't know.
Thanks! Now I am trying to recall if I ever ingested any split shot when I was younger figuring it would just pass right on through. Maybe the fact that I can't remember is a sign...

Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast

"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.

One good fish, a sharpie does not make...

Certified rock hopping billy goat.
tlapinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 11:41 AM   #34
SBASS1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 118
Eel-Bob?
SBASS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 11:57 AM   #35
smac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vineyard Haven
Posts: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ View Post
Scenario: You’ve discovered a new and very effective method of taking large striped bass which requires you to add foreign/toxic substances into the natural bait you are using. Without adding them your secret bait will not work. Only problem is that these added substances can be very harmful, if not fatal, to bass, other fish, and wildlife that happen to eat your secret bait should it come off your hook or you happen to drop the bait overboard. Undersize bass or legal bass that you plan on releasing will also suffer or potentially perish if they've already ingested the bait. You’re now caught in a dilemma: do you continue to use this method to catch more bass than you ever have knowing that you might be causing collateral damage or by-kill to other wildlife, or do you give it up and go back to other less effective methods you’ve used in the past that produce less by-kill. What would you do?
No. Never tried yo-yoing. Never felt the need to learn and try it. Dont you know that fish practically jump in the boat out here.
smac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 12:12 PM   #36
Jackbass
Land OF Forgotten Toys
iTrader: (0)
 
Jackbass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central MA
Posts: 2,309
If there is no science backing it up by can't bird hunters use lead shot?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jackbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 12:40 PM   #37
PRBuzz
BuzzLuck
iTrader: (0)
 
PRBuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brockton
Posts: 6,414
Send a message via Skype™ to PRBuzz
"the authors said that numerous studies already documented adverse effects to wildlife, especially waterbirds and scavenging species, like hawks and eagles. Lead exposure from ingested lead shot, bullets, and fishing sinkers also has been reported in reptiles, and studies near shooting ranges have shown evidence of lead poisoning in small mammals.

Although fish ingest sinkers, jigs, and hooks, mortality in fish seems to be related to injury, blood loss, exposure to air and exhaustion rather than the lead toxicity that affects warm-blooded species."

USGS Release: Lead Shot and Sinkers: Weighty Implications for Fish and Wildlife Health (7/11/2008 11:29:09 AM)

Given the diversity of the human species, there is no “normal” human genome sequence. We are all mutants.
PRBuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 01:09 PM   #38
MAKAI
Too old to give a....
iTrader: (0)
 
MAKAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,505
I stopped fishing any method that had a high rate of gut hooking years ago. Just felt like the right thing to do. Seemed googan like tossing back bleeders.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
MAKAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 02:22 PM   #39
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRBuzz View Post
"

Although fish ingest sinkers, jigs, and hooks, mortality in fish seems to be related to injury, blood loss, exposure to air and exhaustion rather than the lead toxicity that affects warm-blooded species."

USGS Release: Lead Shot and Sinkers: Weighty Implications for Fish and Wildlife Health (7/11/2008 11:29:09 AM)
I read the technical report so I could see what precipitated the above statement. http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/loon...eview_lead.pdf

Two things:

The studies in the technical report do not indicate that lead is non-toxic in fish. Studies of fish mortality have found injuries from catching and handling do kill fish. That is not the same as lead does not kill fish. The above statement implies that cold-blooded organisms are not affected by lead like warm blooded, but I can't find anything implicit in the report to support that, though I may have missed it.

The report lists many studies that show that ingested lead accumulates in the organs and tissues of fish that have ingested it and that there are morphological changes associated with it.

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 03:01 PM   #40
CowHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
CowHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Union,NJ
Posts: 989
You see the Yo-Yoing topic bought up so many times on how it "hurts" the fish and how it should be banned, yet this method is only effective in such a small area targeting structure oriented fish only in certain conditions. It is limited to boat fishing only. The amount of people actually fishing this method and being effective at it is minuscule and those that are effective have every intention of killing the fish they catch. If there is so much concern of "hurting" these fish why do you never, ever see any talk of banning "snagging hooks"??? They are trebble hooks with a hunk of lead all in one! The "snagg and drop" method is used by thousands, and thousands of bouth shorebound and boat anglers! The method is used from as far north as the pogie swims to as far south as the pogie swims! The angler casts and rips the "snagging" hook through schools of pogies. There is no consideration to the collateral harm that it causes pogies, blues, bass, and other species of fish, sometimes mammal as the snagging hook cuts deep into them only to cause infection later. Eventually one of these pogies will become "snagged" then dropped, and then a fish, preferably a large bass will eat it! The angler will wait till the predatory fish has the snagged bunker deep, deep in the gut before sticking them with all their might! The fish is then dragged in and onto the beach or boat. Once in the angler kills the fish or if the fish is not to liking cut the line and release the fish because it is easier to retie a new rig or dig into the fishes gut, make a bloody mess, salvage the snagging hook and either way release it only to repeat the process.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Last edited by CowHunter; 01-10-2013 at 03:06 PM..
CowHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:39 AM   #41
Sea Flat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 404
I still come back to the fact that it is possible to yo-yo effectively without using all of that dangerous crap. There is plenty of info out there about how to do it, perhaps the best of both worlds for those that like the method and find it successful.

Sea Flat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:32 PM   #42
striper junkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 36
Am I the only person who doesn't know what yo yo ing is? I've heard the term many times before, but could someone give a quik overview of what it entails?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
striper junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:39 PM   #43
piemma
Very Grumpy bay man
iTrader: (0)
 
piemma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,824
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by striper junkie View Post
Am I the only person who doesn't know what yo yo ing is? I've heard the term many times before, but could someone give a quik overview of what it entails?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I'm not going to get into details because it's like showing you how to shoot dope.

It's deadly.

You weight a pogie with a lead or an old spark plug. You do some other stuff and then you hook it in back of the dorsal fin. You have to be on a boat. You drop in straight down and..... get the picture.

No boat, back in the suds.
piemma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 05:57 PM   #44
thefishingfreak
"Fishbucket"
iTrader: (1)
 
thefishingfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bahston Hahbah
Posts: 6,588
Funny how all the fish caught with lead in there belly are still alive, until they are killed another way. How many fish are caught with plugs hanging out of their face? Or like was mentioned snag hooks on there bellys? Snag-drop-snap" line breaks. Ohh well tie on another snag hook on and rip it again.

It's on the books in Mass now that all the "gear" must be attached to the mainline. Problem (or complaints of a problem) solved.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Last edited by thefishingfreak; 01-14-2013 at 06:05 PM..
thefishingfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 12:37 AM   #45
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingfreak View Post
Funny how all the fish caught with lead in there belly are still alive, until they are killed another way. How many fish are caught with plugs hanging out of their face? Or like was mentioned snag hooks on there bellys? Snag-drop-snap" line breaks. Ohh well tie on another snag hook on and rip it again.

It's on the books in Mass now that all the "gear" must be attached to the mainline. Problem (or complaints of a problem) solved.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
+1

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 04:21 AM   #46
fcap60
Frank Capone
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hamden, Connecticut
Posts: 2,229
For me, this is easy.

I would not use the harmful secret bait
fcap60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 08:29 AM   #47
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingfreak View Post
Funny how all the fish caught with lead in there belly are still alive,
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I think it would be funnier if we caught dead fish .

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 03:24 PM   #48
Swimmer
Retired Surfer
iTrader: (0)
 
Swimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
I never lost a fish yo yo'ing, never. Everytime I did fish this way was on a comm. license a buddy of mine held. I have never ever cut a fish open that I caught surf fishing that I filleted that I ever found lead in its gullet either. So it either isn't being done that often, or when it is done it is very effective and the angler lands the fish, or its doesn't kill the fish who ate the lead. After all how many floaters do any of us see? Anyone can query a post that I did here that explains it in a finite manner. I did yo yo in the canal once, but I got really tired trying to hold bottom, using 14 #'s of lead weight, standing in the middle of the railroad bridge using a spiral wrapped boat rod.

Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
Swimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com