Fed's to make your car payments

[buckman]

So now that GM is going to make your payments if you lose your job after buying a new car, it's nice to see tax payers will be funding car payments.

[spence]

Amazing...




...that you spend so much time thinking about some of this. If the goal is to restructure GM and keep a domestic auto industy going, little matters like this, and this is a little matter, can't distract you from the strategic objective.

-spence

[Raider Ronnie]

Ernie Bartack says
"Come on down to the automile"
"Rt 1 Norwood, COME ON DOWN

[Cool Beans]

So FORD (never took bailout money) comes up with an idea:

"DEARBORN, Mich., March 31, 2009 – Ford Motor Company is introducing the most comprehensive program available to boost consumers’ buying confidence and begin rebuilding the American economy with the new Ford Advantage Plan.
The plan gives customers another reason to “Drive One” with payment protection of up to 12 months on any new Ford, Lincoln or Mercury vehicle, 0 percent financing on select vehicles and added local charity support."

GM takes a watered down version of it 9 months of payment protection, and everyone talks about GM.

I am just glad that FORD stayed away from the government money, and I for one will make my next new car a FORD to support American business not Government Motors (GM). As for Chrysler they will probably disappear.

[RIJIMMY]

Spence, I really am amazed at your lack of any critical thnking unless it is directed at peoples posts. Are you able to look at all into the future? I heard yesterday that Obama and Cos plan is to eliminate some of GMs most profitable vehicles, what are they? BIG TRUCKS!! So now they'll force GM to make more cars people dont want, and how will they ensure that they are profitable? THEY WILL RAISE THE GAS TAX TO MAKE PEOPLE BUY SMALLER CARS!!!
Do you ever stop and think what this all means? Stop and read the constitution!

[Cool Beans]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration is seeking to ease General Motors Corp into a "controlled" bankruptcy by persuading some creditors to agree to a plan that would divide the company into two pieces, the New York Times reported on Wednesday.
Citing people briefed on the matter, the Times said the plan is to push GM into a structured bankruptcy "somewhere between a prepackaged bankruptcy and court chaos," using taxpayer financing for leverage.
The administration is drawing in part from its experience with troubled banks, seeking to create a new, healthier GM, but leaving behind its liabilities and less valuable assets, possibly for liquidation, the Times said on its website.
Under the plan, GM would file for prearranged bankruptcy, the report said, and would then use a sale authorized under Section 363 of the U.S. bankruptcy code to sell off desirable assets to a new company financed by the government.
These more valuable assets might include Cadillac and Chevrolet, as well as assets the company needs to run its business, the Times said.
Plans are still under discussion and details are subject to change, the report said.
GM officials warned on Tuesday there was a rising chance it could file for bankruptcy by June."

Maybe time to buy stock in FORD.......

[fishbones]

Originally Posted by spence

Amazing...




...that you spend so much time thinking about some of this. If the goal is to restructure GM and keep a domestic auto industy going, little matters like this, and this is a little matter, can't distract you from the strategic objective.

-spence

Spence, do you really believe that GM needs to be kept going? I wonder if it might be better to let them fail. They got themselves in this mess and if they can't get out of it, let them fail. Obama, Inc. isn't going to step in and save the little local businesses that are suffering because of the economy.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by fishbones

Spence, do you really believe that GM needs to be kept going? I wonder if it might be better to let them fail. They got themselves in this mess and if they can't get out of it, let them fail. Obama, Inc. isn't going to step in and save the little local businesses that are suffering because of the economy.

Agreed. Let. Them. Fail.

This isn't truly a democratic society. It is a Capitalistic society. The country was founded with capitalistic goals in mind - to hunt, harvest and scavenge products to trade with Europe. As competition came in, they were forced to adjust. Early colonists didn't supply to current fads. Information traveled to slowly to make an approach like that possible. They provided quality products that people wanted to buy.

GM, on the other hand, did the exact opposite. They created crappy vehicles that sometimes played into current fads, as opposed to anticipating the consumer's needs and supplying quality products that created their own demand.

Let. Them. Fail.

[JohnnyD]

Also, I'm tired of people saying the only reason Toyota was able to do so well is because it isn't Union. What about Ford? Ford is union and they have been surviving without any government handouts.

Ford's CEO too proactive approaches to prevent a situation like this. He sold off losing portions of the company like Jaguar and utilized that money to create products the consumer wants.

Another example of Ford doing it right in comparison to GM doing it wrong - Ford is the first domestic car company to bring to market a viable hybrid option for the consumer. Ford anticipated that more consumers would want a hybrid option. On average, people are commuting further to work than they were 20 years ago and Ford recognized the demand.

As I've been saying for months, a poor business plan is why companies like GM are in the toilet. They've been far below the curve for years and should have been sold off after they thought the Aztek was a good vehicle to bring to market.

[striperman36]

if they fail, not just enter Chapter 11, cease operations all together, I think there would be a tremendous impact across the global economy.

[fishbones]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

They've been far below the curve for years and should have been sold off after they thought the Aztek was a good vehicle to bring to market.

The Pontiac Aztek may not have been a great vehicle, but it came with the worlds best anti-theft sytem.












It's looks.

[Cool Beans]

Originally Posted by striperman36

if they fail, not just enter Chapter 11, cease operations all together, I think there would be a tremendous impact across the global economy.

If they are forced to make electric crap and stop making the American pick up truck (their #1 money maker since the 30s) they will fail.

Of course Obama will do his part and subsidize them and give tax credits to people to buy the "crap".
And if that doesn't work, we will run the fuel prices up, by restricting oil production further, making it too expensive to drive regular cars.
(last week congress passed a bill adding 200,000 acres to the off limits area for oil exploration and use)

Not sure what to do, invest in FORD or buy a crap ton of double A batteries for my future golf cart.....

One sure bet, buy property in Dubai...

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by striperman36

if they fail, not just enter Chapter 11, cease operations all together, I think there would be a tremendous impact across the global economy.

How? We don't export a massive number of GM vehicles and have to import most of the materials needed to build the vehicle. GM and Chrysler play no major roll in the global economy. They aren't a company like General Electric that employs 330,000 people worldwide with key roles in multiple industries from aerospace to lightbulbs.

I think there would be a tremendous impact on the local economies, in that whole towns have been developed where 90% of the town is employed at the factory.

However, I'm willing to sacrifice the financial security of the few for the benefits of the country as a whole. I would rather see the money that is being sent to GM go to the employees for re-education so they can develop a new set of skills. The company is on track to fail resulting in those people losing their jobs anyway, and we're only delaying the inevitable.

[RIJIMMY]

toyota succeeds because of the mastery of lean processing. Constant process improvement, measuring progress, correcting measures is ingrained in their culture.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by Cool Beans

If they are forced to make electric crap and stop making the American pick up truck (their #1 money maker since the 30s) they will fail.

Why exactly is it "electric crap"?

I will give GM one benefit of the doubt. They developed a Chevy hybrid pickup truck that put out the exact same torque and HP as their non-hybrid model. Only difference between the two was that the hybrid got almost double the gas mileage.

Then, back to my comment that the company has a terrible business plan, they didn't market the truck or provide any PR for it. There wasn't any demand because no one knew about it.

A friend of mine owns a landscaping company. Last year on one of his work trucks, he was paying over $1000/month in fuel costs - on one truck! Now, cut that number almost in half and he would have saved over $4000 in expenses last year for that truck.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

toyota succeeds because of the mastery of lean processing. Constant process improvement, measuring progress, correcting measures is ingrained in their culture.

All these actions are representational of a solid company. Companies that do not keep track of detailed metrics do not deserve to exist. They are allowed to continue to operate based on pockets of ignorance in the consumer base.

GM should spend more time tracking metrics and making improvements than investing R&D in that POS Hummer, H2, H3 and I'm sure they have the H4 in the works. They grasp on to these short-lived fads and are unable to sell enough units to turn a decent ROI.

[buckman]

The Union's tried to get in to the Toyota plants. Toyota factory workers didn't want them in. Without Union dues, they actually make more then American auto workers.

[likwid]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

All these actions are representational of a solid company. Companies that do not keep track of detailed metrics do not deserve to exist. They are allowed to continue to operate based on pockets of ignorance in the consumer base.

GM should spend more time tracking metrics and making improvements than investing R&D in that POS Hummer, H2, H3 and I'm sure they have the H4 in the works. They grasp on to these short-lived fads and are unable to sell enough units to turn a decent ROI.

Source: GoAuto.com.au

HUMMER will consolidate its upcoming H3 range in Australia from 2009 with a variety of new models that will include a compact SUV, diesel, ethanol and hybrid power, and a new full-sized H2.

Central to this will be engineering and design input from General Motors’ global outposts, including Holden, but perhaps Hummer’s most ambitious plan involves a vehicle that sits below the H3 – currently the company’s smallest offering.

Known as the H4 – although this may change by the time it appears around 2010 – it will give the Hummer brand a vital weapon in the United States against premium-priced compact SUVs such as the Nissan Murano.

Yay another vehicle that its origional inspiriation is similar in name only!

American automobile manufacturers are complete idiots.
They were in trouble BEFORE the market tanked.

Luxury: ruled by europe
Economy: ruled by japan and europe
Longevity: ruled by japan
Innovation: ruled by europe
Driveability: ruled by europe

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

All these actions are representational of a solid company. Companies that do not keep track of detailed metrics do not deserve to exist. They are allowed to continue to operate based on pockets of ignorance in the consumer base.

GM should spend more time tracking metrics and making improvements than investing R&D in that POS Hummer, H2, H3 and I'm sure they have the H4 in the works. They grasp on to these short-lived fads and are unable to sell enough units to turn a decent ROI.

yup

Also, think of this. Why would ANYONE qualified to make change and take big business risks join GM? What superstar would want the job?So that if they are successful and receive compensation to match their success they will be publicly flogged by the congress? The reaction to the AIG bonuses has put a serious bruise on the credibility of the government. Many qualified and intelligent people will not be signing up to work for any companies tied to the government.

[Cool Beans]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

yup

Also, think of this. Why would ANYONE qualified to make change and take big business risks join GM? What superstar would want the job?So that if they are successful and receive compensation to match their success they will be publicly flogged by the congress? The reaction to the AIG bonuses has put a serious bruise on the credibility of the government. Many qualified and intelligent people will not be signing up to work for any companies tied to the government.

I've got a retarded Uncle, that is looking for work....
He voted for Obama too.

That's 2 out of the 3 things they are looking for.

Now if I can only teach him to read a teleprompter (to hold press conferences and say its all his fault) he may have a future at GM.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by likwid

Source: GoAuto.com.au

HUMMER will consolidate its upcoming H3 range in Australia from 2009 with a variety of new models that will include a compact SUV, diesel, ethanol and hybrid power, and a new full-sized H2.

Central to this will be engineering and design input from General Motors’ global outposts, including Holden, but perhaps Hummer’s most ambitious plan involves a vehicle that sits below the H3 – currently the company’s smallest offering.

Known as the H4 – although this may change by the time it appears around 2010 – it will give the Hummer brand a vital weapon in the United States against premium-priced compact SUVs such as the Nissan Murano.

When I made my post, I had no idea about this. I was just speculating. This is what happens when an entire sub-company is based around only one model.

I can't effing believe this... and we're giving these idiots even more money???

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

yup

Also, think of this. Why would ANYONE qualified to make change and take big business risks join GM? What superstar would want the job?So that if they are successful and receive compensation to match their success they will be publicly flogged by the congress? The reaction to the AIG bonuses has put a serious bruise on the credibility of the government. Many qualified and intelligent people will not be signing up to work for any companies tied to the government.

Good. They're going to fail anyway. Hopefully the government realizes this sooner than later before too much money is completely wasted. The last thing we need is a subsidized automaker in similar shoes as Amtrack - wasting money with no regard and not improving the product or efficiencies because the government will just give is more money anyway.

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by Cool Beans

I've got a retarded Uncle, that is looking for work....
He voted for Obama too.

That's 2 out of the 3 things they are looking for.

Now if I can only teach him to read a teleprompter (to hold press conferences and say its all his fault) he may have a future at GM.

wow, that made me laugh out loud. Too funny

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

Good. They're going to fail anyway. Hopefully the government realizes this sooner than later before too much money is completely wasted. The last thing we need is a subsidized automaker in similar shoes as Amtrack - wasting money with no regard and not improving the product or efficiencies because the government will just give is more money anyway.

so Johnny, just to be clear, if GM fails, Obama does too. Its his gamble he has chosen to make - to support GM.
Sounds "Limbaugh-ish" of you to want Obama to fail.

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

toyota succeeds because of the mastery of lean processing. Constant process improvement, measuring progress, correcting measures is ingrained in their culture.

Also,
Toyota suceeds because they make a GREAT product !!!
GM has been making crap for decades !
Chrysler ever worse crap !
Ford of the big 3 has made the best quality of the 3, but would also be hurting if not for all the trucks and Crown Vics (police, taxis, govt cars.....) sold !

[striperman36]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

When I made my post, I had no idea about this. I was just speculating. This is what happens when an entire sub-company is based around only one model.

I can't effing believe this... and we're giving these idiots even more money???

I thought GM didn't have any presence outside of the US?

[justplugit]

Let them fail, go under, then restructure.

If Sweden,one of the most socialist countries in Europe,
won't bail out Saab, what makes us think a GM bailout
will work?

[TheSpecialist]

The Pontiac Aztek may not have been a great vehicle, but it came with the worlds best anti-theft sytem.

ugly car = excellent anti-theft...


Who says Toyota Auto workers don't want to unionize?

Toyota Powers Ahead at Kentucky Plant

by Frank Langfitt

Listen Now add to playlist

Frank Langfitt, NPR.
Leonard Habermehl is a skilled repairman who started at Toyota in 1990. He once thought unions weren't necessary. Now he'd like to see one at his Kentucky plant.


GM vs. Toyota

Top-seller in U.S. (2004)
GM: Chevrolet Silverado 680,768
Toyota: Toyota Camry 426,990

U.S. Sales (2004)
GM: 4,655,459
Toyota: 2,060,049

U.S. Market Share*
GM: 26.8%
Toyota: 13%

*Market share through the first nine months of 2005

More GM vs. Toyota comparisons

More Coverage

Dec. 19, 2005
Shrinking GM Means Pain for Factory Families

All Things Considered, December 20, 2005 · While General Motors and Ford are preparing to slash jobs and close plants, foreign carmakers like Toyota continue to build new facilities in the South.

Targeting rural areas, companies from Honda to Hyundai have tapped an eager labor force in a region where it's easier to keep costs down.

Toyota -- now nipping at the heels of the world's largest auto company, GM -- built one of its first U.S. plants in Kentucky, where it started producing cars in 1988.

Renee Brown works assembling the Camry -- the nation's best-selling car. She puts in seat belts and cup holders at Toyota's plant in Kentucky horse country.

Brown grew up in Beattyville, a tiny, struggling town in the state's Appalachian coalfields. The town doesn't have many good jobs today.

Brown previously worked as an assistant manager at Dairy Queen, where she made $20,000 annually. Six years ago, she got a job at Toyota.

Now, Brown makes $70,000 a year -- more than twice the average manufacturing wage in the area.

The United Auto Workers have tried to crack the Toyota plant since before it opened. Last spring, they opened their own organizing office just down the road.

But Brown says that Toyota's wages are so close to the union's, she doesn't see the advantage.

That workers like Brown aren't interested in unions is no accident. Manufacturers like Toyota locate their plants in regions hungry for jobs with good salaries. It's the result of a strategy foreign car companies have used for years to avoid unionization.

Gary Chaison, who teaches industrial relations at Clark University in Masachussetts, says Toyota and its peers also try to treat workers well, take their opinions into account and give them a stake in the plant's success.

Despite the wages, some Toyota workers say they need a union. They complain the company drives them so hard that people get injured, and when they can't work anymore, Toyota pays them off to leave

Leonard Habermehl is a skilled repairman and makes up to $85,000 per year. When he came to Toyota in 1990, he didn't see why he needed a union. But after years of service in which he says he has seen people injured and forced out of their jobs, he now believes the plant should unionize.

The plant employs 7,000 people and is slated to build 340,000 Camry's this year. Next year, it will produce the new Camry hybrid, a point of pride among all employees.

Pete Gritton oversees human resources at the plant. He says attrition among workers is below 3 percent. He estimates about 15 workers leave because of injuries each year.

Gritton says the company tries to find them other jobs, but can't always make a match.

If organizing workers was tough before, Habermehl says it's even harder now with the UAW under seige. Ford and GM are looking to cut tens of thousands of jobs. Delphi, the world's largest auto parts maker, only recently backed off demands for union wage cuts of more than 50 percent.

Habermehl says future wages at Toyota depend on the UAW, whether plant employees realize it or not. When wages rise at the Big Three, they're also likely to rise at Toyota. And when they fall in Detroit's plants, Toyota could reduce them as well.

Habermehl isn't optimistic about unionizing Toyota. Once an activist, he doesn't spend as much time around the organizing office these days. He says the UAW is so distracted by the U.S. automakers, it probably won't be able to make a serious run at Toyota.

[Squid kids Dad]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

Also,
Toyota suceeds because they make a GREAT product !!!
GM has been making crap for decades !
Chrysler ever worse crap !
Ford of the big 3 has made the best quality of the 3, but would also be hurting if not for all the trucks and Crown Vics (police, taxis, govt cars.....) sold !

I agree completly...And pretty soon there will be no more crown vics for taxis at least in Mass..They are being faced out for hybrids

[buckman]

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist

ugly car = excellent anti-theft...


Who says Toyota Auto workers don't want to unionize?

Toyota Powers Ahead at Kentucky Plant

by Frank Langfitt

Listen Now add to playlist

Frank Langfitt, NPR.
Leonard Habermehl is a skilled repairman who started at Toyota in 1990. He once thought unions weren't necessary. Now he'd like to see one at his Kentucky plant.


GM vs. Toyota

Top-seller in U.S. (2004)
GM: Chevrolet Silverado 680,768
Toyota: Toyota Camry 426,990

U.S. Sales (2004)
GM: 4,655,459
Toyota: 2,060,049

U.S. Market Share*
GM: 26.8%
Toyota: 13%

*Market share through the first nine months of 2005

More GM vs. Toyota comparisons

More Coverage

Dec. 19, 2005
Shrinking GM Means Pain for Factory Families

All Things Considered, December 20, 2005 · While General Motors and Ford are preparing to slash jobs and close plants, foreign carmakers like Toyota continue to build new facilities in the South.

Targeting rural areas, companies from Honda to Hyundai have tapped an eager labor force in a region where it's easier to keep costs down.

Toyota -- now nipping at the heels of the world's largest auto company, GM -- built one of its first U.S. plants in Kentucky, where it started producing cars in 1988.

Renee Brown works assembling the Camry -- the nation's best-selling car. She puts in seat belts and cup holders at Toyota's plant in Kentucky horse country.

Brown grew up in Beattyville, a tiny, struggling town in the state's Appalachian coalfields. The town doesn't have many good jobs today.

Brown previously worked as an assistant manager at Dairy Queen, where she made $20,000 annually. Six years ago, she got a job at Toyota.

Now, Brown makes $70,000 a year -- more than twice the average manufacturing wage in the area.

The United Auto Workers have tried to crack the Toyota plant since before it opened. Last spring, they opened their own organizing office just down the road.

But Brown says that Toyota's wages are so close to the union's, she doesn't see the advantage.

That workers like Brown aren't interested in unions is no accident. Manufacturers like Toyota locate their plants in regions hungry for jobs with good salaries. It's the result of a strategy foreign car companies have used for years to avoid unionization.

Gary Chaison, who teaches industrial relations at Clark University in Masachussetts, says Toyota and its peers also try to treat workers well, take their opinions into account and give them a stake in the plant's success.

Despite the wages, some Toyota workers say they need a union. They complain the company drives them so hard that people get injured, and when they can't work anymore, Toyota pays them off to leave

Leonard Habermehl is a skilled repairman and makes up to $85,000 per year. When he came to Toyota in 1990, he didn't see why he needed a union. But after years of service in which he says he has seen people injured and forced out of their jobs, he now believes the plant should unionize.

The plant employs 7,000 people and is slated to build 340,000 Camry's this year. Next year, it will produce the new Camry hybrid, a point of pride among all employees.

Pete Gritton oversees human resources at the plant. He says attrition among workers is below 3 percent. He estimates about 15 workers leave because of injuries each year.

Gritton says the company tries to find them other jobs, but can't always make a match.

If organizing workers was tough before, Habermehl says it's even harder now with the UAW under seige. Ford and GM are looking to cut tens of thousands of jobs. Delphi, the world's largest auto parts maker, only recently backed off demands for union wage cuts of more than 50 percent.

Habermehl says future wages at Toyota depend on the UAW, whether plant employees realize it or not. When wages rise at the Big Three, they're also likely to rise at Toyota. And when they fall in Detroit's plants, Toyota could reduce them as well.

Habermehl isn't optimistic about unionizing Toyota. Once an activist, he doesn't spend as much time around the organizing office these days. He says the UAW is so distracted by the U.S. automakers, it probably won't be able to make a serious run at Toyota.

What's amazing is Toyota moves into a rural area and provides thousands of high paying jobs and some people that get those jobs still complain. They should quit and I'm sure someone else will fill there spot.